Why Does Evolutionary Science Only Believe In Things In Which There Is No Evidence?

[james bond]

It starts with the theory of evolution in biology. Just because microevolution happens and both sides agree, it does not lead to macroevolution of change via mutation such as humans from monkeys and birds from dinosaurs. We just do not have the transitional fossil evidence for it. Moreover, there is contradiction in terms of how long-time was calculated using radiometric dating.

One of the latest that I read was that NASA believes that one day we will be able to time travel. We already are able to travel forward in time, but we cannot travel back in time. This is impossible as God has made it so that we will not be able to travel back in time. The Bible does not directly address the idea of time travel because such science fiction did not exist in ancient times. What Scripture indicates is that each person has an appointed time of death (Hebrews 9:27) and that this is known by God before they happen (Jeremiah 1:5, Acts 17:26). This would be possible if God existed in a higher dimension beyond spacetime. He would be able to read what happened to so-and-so as if he were reading a history book. We've already have seen space and time expand until we reach our end. It's just that our time has not caught up to that point yet. As we continue to read the Bible, it often speaks of events occurring according to God's timetable (Genesis 21:1; John 7:8, 1 Timothy 2:6). This runs counter to the idea of people changing historical events through time travel going back in time.

That said, this is what NASA states:
"General relativity also provides scenarios that could allow travelers to go back in time, according to NASA. The equations, however, might be difficult to physically achieve.

One possibility could be to go faster than light, which travels at 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second) in a vacuum. Einstein's equations, though, show that an object at the speed of light would have both infinite mass and a length of 0. This appears to be physically impossible, although some scientists have extended his equations and said it might be done.

A linked possibility, NASA stated, would be to create "wormholes" between points in space-time. While Einstein's equations provide for them, they would collapse very quickly and would only be suitable for very small particles. Also, scientists haven't actually observed these wormholes yet. Also, the technology needed to create a wormhole is far beyond anything we have today."

Time Travel: Theories, Paradoxes & Possibilities

Here is how we travel into the future which we can do on a limited basis today (skip to 7:33)..

 

[the other mike]

Science is a thing.
It doesn't believe anything .
Therefore the question in the title doesn't actually make sense.

 

[the other mike]

 

[S.J.]

The left have the same philosophy toward all of their lies. If you repeat a lie enough, people will believe it. Where have I heard that before?

 

[denmark]

The left have the same philosophy toward all of their lies. If you repeat a lie enough, people will believe it. Where have I heard that before?

You yourself blabbered that before.

 

[denmark]

Is the OP poster implying that religious texts reflect evidence?
He thinks scientists believe humans came from monkeys?
I hope he is not a teacher!

 

[S.J.]

The left have the same philosophy toward all of their lies. If you repeat a lie enough, people will believe it. Where have I heard that before?

You yourself blabbered that before.

Oh, now I remember...Joseph Goebbels
Thank you, you must have reminded me of a Nazi.

 

[denmark]

The left have the same philosophy toward all of their lies. If you repeat a lie enough, people will believe it. Where have I heard that before?

You yourself blabbered that before.

Oh, now I remember...Joseph Goebbels
Thank you, you must have reminded me of a Nazi.

You like to blabber, I see.

 

[fncceo]

"General relativity also provides scenarios that could allow travelers to go back in time,

Conjecture is different from fact.

Saying something isn't against the laws of physics as we currently understand them isn't the same as stating it to be a fact.

 

[alang1216]

It starts with the theory of evolution in biology. Just because microevolution happens and both sides agree, it does not lead to macroevolution of change via mutation such as humans from monkeys and birds from dinosaurs. We just do not have the transitional fossil evidence for it. Moreover, there is contradiction in terms of how long-time was calculated using radiometric dating.

One of the latest that I read was that NASA believes that one day we will be able to time travel. We already are able to travel forward in time, but we cannot travel back in time. This is impossible as God has made it so that we will not be able to travel back in time. The Bible does not directly address the idea of time travel because such science fiction did not exist in ancient times. What Scripture indicates is that each person has an appointed time of death (Hebrews 9:27) and that this is known by God before they happen (Jeremiah 1:5, Acts 17:26). This would be possible if God existed in a higher dimension beyond spacetime. He would be able to read what happened to so-and-so as if he were reading a history book. We've already have seen space and time expand until we reach our end. It's just that our time has not caught up to that point yet. As we continue to read the Bible, it often speaks of events occurring according to God's timetable (Genesis 21:1; John 7:8, 1 Timothy 2:6). This runs counter to the idea of people changing historical events through time travel going back in time.

That said, this is what NASA states:
"General relativity also provides scenarios that could allow travelers to go back in time, according to NASA. The equations, however, might be difficult to physically achieve.

One possibility could be to go faster than light, which travels at 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second) in a vacuum. Einstein's equations, though, show that an object at the speed of light would have both infinite mass and a length of 0. This appears to be physically impossible, although some scientists have extended his equations and said it might be done.

A linked possibility, NASA stated, would be to create "wormholes" between points in space-time. While Einstein's equations provide for them, they would collapse very quickly and would only be suitable for very small particles. Also, scientists haven't actually observed these wormholes yet. Also, the technology needed to create a wormhole is far beyond anything we have today."

Time Travel: Theories, Paradoxes & Possibilities

Here is how we travel into the future which we can do on a limited basis today (skip to 7:33)..

First off, you're completely wrong about no transitional fossils. EVERY fossil is transitional. Geologists measure time in many ways and they do NOT contradict.

If you really believe God is above nature why do you limit his options for time travel? If he made space and time, I'd certainly think he can make time travel possible. He has given us the ability to do lots of things previously thought impossible, going to the moon for example, so why is time travel so different?

 

[LittleNipper]

Science is a thing.
It doesn't believe anything .
Therefore the question in the title doesn't actually make sense.

Perhaps "Evolutionary" Science is an ambiguous term. It's like saying Roman Catholic Church. Evolution is specific in what it accepts as scientific (it is in fact very judgmental in reference to itself as correct, accurate and exclusive). The term Roman Catholic Church is very much the same. Catholic is a Latin term meaning Universal; however ROMAN is an exclusive term. So the Roman Catholic church isn't all inclusive. It is exclusive to itself.

I do believe in the Universal Church, just not a Roman Catholic version. In that respect I hold that all true believers in Our Lord Jesus Christ are in fact all SAINTS and part of this "CATHOLIC/UNIVERSAL" CHURCH that was founded by CHRIST!

As a result, I do not feel that Evolutionary Science is true science, because it is limited to the pursuit of establishing EVOLUTION as correct at the exclusion of contrary data. Creationism on the other hand tries to understand all data in light of the revelation of Jesus Christ.

 

[Sunni Man]

 

[sealybobo]

It starts with the theory of evolution in biology. Just because microevolution happens and both sides agree, it does not lead to macroevolution of change via mutation such as humans from monkeys and birds from dinosaurs. We just do not have the transitional fossil evidence for it. Moreover, there is contradiction in terms of how long-time was calculated using radiometric dating.

One of the latest that I read was that NASA believes that one day we will be able to time travel. We already are able to travel forward in time, but we cannot travel back in time. This is impossible as God has made it so that we will not be able to travel back in time. The Bible does not directly address the idea of time travel because such science fiction did not exist in ancient times. What Scripture indicates is that each person has an appointed time of death (Hebrews 9:27) and that this is known by God before they happen (Jeremiah 1:5, Acts 17:26). This would be possible if God existed in a higher dimension beyond spacetime. He would be able to read what happened to so-and-so as if he were reading a history book. We've already have seen space and time expand until we reach our end. It's just that our time has not caught up to that point yet. As we continue to read the Bible, it often speaks of events occurring according to God's timetable (Genesis 21:1; John 7:8, 1 Timothy 2:6). This runs counter to the idea of people changing historical events through time travel going back in time.

That said, this is what NASA states:
"General relativity also provides scenarios that could allow travelers to go back in time, according to NASA. The equations, however, might be difficult to physically achieve.

One possibility could be to go faster than light, which travels at 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second) in a vacuum. Einstein's equations, though, show that an object at the speed of light would have both infinite mass and a length of 0. This appears to be physically impossible, although some scientists have extended his equations and said it might be done.

A linked possibility, NASA stated, would be to create "wormholes" between points in space-time. While Einstein's equations provide for them, they would collapse very quickly and would only be suitable for very small particles. Also, scientists haven't actually observed these wormholes yet. Also, the technology needed to create a wormhole is far beyond anything we have today."

Time Travel: Theories, Paradoxes & Possibilities

Here is how we travel into the future which we can do on a limited basis today (skip to 7:33)..

We have the same evidence of the Big Bang as we do evolution. Lots of facts point to evolution.

No evidence your hypothesis is true yet you believe.

In fact you believe a holy book that’s full of lies and miracles. You believe a fairytale. With no possible evidence.

So stfu

 

[sealybobo]

Science is a thing.
It doesn't believe anything .
Therefore the question in the title doesn't actually make sense.

Science is already starting to question the Big Bang theory. Their starting to realize the Big Bang is just the start of our observable universe. That’s all we know. There’s probably other universes outside ours.

But we don’t have any evidence yet. We might be on to something but for now science is waiting for more evidence.

Clearly they have a lot of evidence for evolution.

Religious nuts ignore the evidence we have and fixate on the evidence we don’t have

 

[sealybobo]

It starts with the theory of evolution in biology. Just because microevolution happens and both sides agree, it does not lead to macroevolution of change via mutation such as humans from monkeys and birds from dinosaurs. We just do not have the transitional fossil evidence for it. Moreover, there is contradiction in terms of how long-time was calculated using radiometric dating.

One of the latest that I read was that NASA believes that one day we will be able to time travel. We already are able to travel forward in time, but we cannot travel back in time. This is impossible as God has made it so that we will not be able to travel back in time. The Bible does not directly address the idea of time travel because such science fiction did not exist in ancient times. What Scripture indicates is that each person has an appointed time of death (Hebrews 9:27) and that this is known by God before they happen (Jeremiah 1:5, Acts 17:26). This would be possible if God existed in a higher dimension beyond spacetime. He would be able to read what happened to so-and-so as if he were reading a history book. We've already have seen space and time expand until we reach our end. It's just that our time has not caught up to that point yet. As we continue to read the Bible, it often speaks of events occurring according to God's timetable (Genesis 21:1; John 7:8, 1 Timothy 2:6). This runs counter to the idea of people changing historical events through time travel going back in time.

That said, this is what NASA states:
"General relativity also provides scenarios that could allow travelers to go back in time, according to NASA. The equations, however, might be difficult to physically achieve.

One possibility could be to go faster than light, which travels at 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second) in a vacuum. Einstein's equations, though, show that an object at the speed of light would have both infinite mass and a length of 0. This appears to be physically impossible, although some scientists have extended his equations and said it might be done.

A linked possibility, NASA stated, would be to create "wormholes" between points in space-time. While Einstein's equations provide for them, they would collapse very quickly and would only be suitable for very small particles. Also, scientists haven't actually observed these wormholes yet. Also, the technology needed to create a wormhole is far beyond anything we have today."

Time Travel: Theories, Paradoxes & Possibilities

Here is how we travel into the future which we can do on a limited basis today (skip to 7:33)..

By the way, micro or macro, I forget which, but one does say we evolved from monkeys. They don’t believe we are related to fish, snakes, dogs, etc.

But all us apes came from one original ape.

Just like all dogs came from wolves. Even cha wha waas. That’s how we know all apes are related because all dogs are. And we did that.

 

[the other mike]

By the way, micro or macro, I forget which, but one does say we evolved from monkeys. They don’t believe we are related to fish, snakes, dogs, etc.

But all us apes came from one original ape.

Just like all dogs came from wolves. Even cha wha waas. That’s how we know all apes are related because all dogs are. And we did that.

We evolved from fungus actually.
But they're spiritual fungus.

 

[Hollie]

As a goofy convert to Islamism, you’re allowed to be stupid, actually, it’s expected.

Carry on.

 

[the other mike]

As a goofy convert to Islamism, you’re allowed to be stupid, actually, it’s expected.

Carry on.

Acknowledging evolution doesn't make a person an atheist.
It's so difficult for some people to grasp.

 

[the other mike]

Fungi Are Responsible For Life On Land As We Know It

 

[BULLDOG]

If that is what you think atheism is, I can understand why you might make so many stupid posts.