Why do the Democrats always do better and better and better the more they recount the votes?

RandomPoster

Platinum Member
May 22, 2017
2,584
1,792
970
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

I wonder how Beto is doing...

Texas Recount Rules: What’s Needed to Trigger a Recount? | Heavy.com
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Could it be that the initial counts were dodgy? In Republican areas too.....
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Could it be that the initial counts were dodgy? In Republican areas too.....

Yeah it’s the INITIAL counts that were dodgy...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Why do republicans whine and cry when they loose?
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Why do republicans whine and cry when they loose?

The Republicans didn't lose that election. They won it. It is, however, suspicious how every time they recount the votes, the Democrats do better and better.

Who is it that wants to prevent the process from being more strict? Republicans are willing to go to a police or ICE station, provide a voter ID, fingerprints, and be photographed when they vote. The Democrats would never allow that because they want the process to be shady.
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Why do republicans whine and cry when they loose?
You mean like riot? Set fires? Trash cities? Don't remember the Republicans doing that. Who was it that did that? Oh the Democrates did that in 2016.
 
Al Franken won a recount in Minnesota in 2008 when a box of ballots was magically discovered after the election in the trunk of a car. Also, take a look at this:

"After culling through 500 initial allegations of felons illegally voting, the Ramsey County Attorney's Office told The Minneapolis Star Tribune Monday that they are seriously investigating about 180 cases. Another 28 felons have already been charged. Hennepin county, which includes Minneapolis, winnowed 451 initial cases down to 216 that they are still looking at. Some other felons have already been charged. Both the Ramsey and Hennepin county attorneys are Democrats.

Whether one believes that those two counties account for 341 or possibly well over 400 felons illegally voting, the 2008 Senate vote was so close and research finds that felons vote so overwhelmingly for Democrats that the odds are quite likely that felons from those two counties gave Al Franken the election.

Even if no other felons voted in any other county, 341 votes and 96 percent of felons voting for Democrats would have given Franken the election. In fact, more than 96 percent of felons probably vote for Democrats (see here)."
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?

Why do republicans whine and cry when they loose?
You mean like riot? Set fires? Trash cities? Don't remember the Republicans doing that. Who was it that did that? Oh the Democrates did that in 2016.

And they formed ANTIFA.
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?
Voter suppression by the GOP isn't 100% effective
 
Stacey Abrams will win the runoff on December 4 because this time there won’t be brand new voting machines found in a warehouse instead of deployed on Election Day. And there won’t be voting machines in minority districts that were set up but didn’t have power cords. And there will be lawyers in the most suppressed districts to ensure every voter gets to vote.
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?
Bush gave us Iraq and the great recession.
 
Stacey Abrams will win the runoff on December 4 because this time there won’t be brand new voting machines found in a warehouse instead of deployed on Election Day. And there won’t be voting machines in minority districts that were set up but didn’t have power cords. And there will be lawyers in the most suppressed districts to ensure every voter gets to vote.

Where is the evidence that Republicans are stealing power chords from voting machines in Democrat districts? Come to think of it, I did see a middle aged white guy in a business suit and a ski mask hiding in the bushes the other day with an arm full of power chords.
 
Last edited:
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?
Bush gave us Iraq and the great recession.

Which has what to do with recounting votes?
 
Stacey Abrams will win the runoff on December 4 because this time there won’t be brand new voting machines found in a warehouse instead of deployed on Election Day. And there won’t be voting machines in minority districts that were set up but didn’t have power cords. And there will be lawyers in the most suppressed districts to ensure every voter gets to vote.

How come the more times they recount the results, Stacey gets more and more votes? Don't blame it on Kemp. The people that count the votes are Democrats working for the government. With Kemp officially gone, Stacey Abrams should beat Kemp at least 75 to 35 percent or more. It might even be that the only vote Kemp gets is the one he casts for himself... if that.

Our forefathers warned against democracy.
 
2018 Florida

2573604B-4C21-4541-A837-252B964EFB53-2582-0000011C295731D8.jpeg
 
Because they add in the ones that should not have been accepted in the first place.
They have doing this for years in tight close races.
They get away with it saying all the votes needs to be counted.
Never mind the pesky rules.
Just like when the ignore the Constitution.
 
Because they add in the ones that should not have been accepted in the first place.
They have doing this for years in tight close races.
They get away with it saying all the votes needs to be counted.
Never mind the pesky rules.
Just like when the ignore the Constitution.

Yeah, we establish rules like you must live in the district you vote in; that your name and your voter registration must match; however, if you're a Democrat, those rules don't apply to you. So much for a nation of laws.
 
2000 Election Gore vs. Bush.

Official result: + 537 Bush
1st recount: + 493 Bush
2nd recount: + 430 Bush
3rd recount: + 225 Bush
4th recount: + 154 Bush : stopped by Supreme Court

If they had simply kept recounting the votes forever until Gore finally won like they should have, we could have solved the Global Warming Crisis. Seriously, who stops an election after the 3rd recount when the right candidate hasn't won yet?
Because we keep finding the ones the republicans hid in one way or another.
 

Forum List

Back
Top