Why do republicans say “Americans first” yet they reject any socialist proposal?

Bullshit, you can't buy an automatic dishwasher that will properly dry the dishes because of energy constraints on appliances. You can't buy a toilet that will flush properly because of water usage restraints. Hell the fuckers even tried to tell us what kind of light bulbs we had to use. I could go on with many more examples of how your fucking socialist policies have removed choice from the average citizen, but frankly, you're not fucking worth the effort.

.
Yeah exactly. There are limitations to what you can buy for the sake of society in general. It’s the same principle of anything illegal.


Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
 
You do realize that you are calling for increased government regulation on the press, right? Aka. A socialist policy.



I actually like many of your ideas, but you are kind of proving Billy’s point.

You do realize that you are calling for increased government regulation on the press, right? Aka. A socialist policy
So we'll just refer to it as "a common sense law" and all is better

.
I actually like many of your ideas, but you are kind of proving Billy’s point.
what point is that?
...I do not want any restrictions on the press, I know that only a free press can lie,[that's how you can tell it is free] like I know that any form of gun control is abridging the right to bear arms, anyone who crosses either of those lines is not a constitutionalist, you either accept the document in whole [or until it is changed] or you don't, there is no middle ground that allows you to be a part time constitutionalist...the whole idea is to get people to see that enacting laws disagreeing with the constitution bestows upon others the same right to deny what they want.
So how exactly do you want to address the issues with the press without government regulation?
 
The federal government is not intended to benefit individuals, you fucking commies have no clue what the founders intended for this country, do you? To quote the father of the Constitution:

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.
Okay, but back to my original OP, what specific examples of non-socialist polices should we start doing? “More freedom” isn’t a solution to poverty or anything else.


You want to fix poverty, look to your fucking State, that's how it's supposed to work. The federal government isn't your mommy or daddy. Hell CA claims to have a large enough surplus to give health care to illegals, but they can't even take care of their homeless citizens.

.
Lol um okay so what “state” policies are non-socialist? You still can’t even give examples.


Individual freedom to live as you chose with the least government interference as possible. That would include not taxing everything in existence.

.
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
 
Yeah exactly. There are limitations to what you can buy for the sake of society in general. It’s the same principle of anything illegal.


Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
In other words you’re unable to debate the topic using substance and intellect. Why are you wasting our time
 
Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
In other words you’re unable to debate the topic using substance and intellect. Why are you wasting our time
Baloney..............the Socialist steal from us to hand out to others is correct............

So........have you seen my dang wallet or what...............

Now go on about interesting debate on how the theft of others money is good for us. LOL
 
Bullshit, you can't buy an automatic dishwasher that will properly dry the dishes because of energy constraints on appliances. You can't buy a toilet that will flush properly because of water usage restraints. Hell the fuckers even tried to tell us what kind of light bulbs we had to use. I could go on with many more examples of how your fucking socialist policies have removed choice from the average citizen, but frankly, you're not fucking worth the effort.

.
Yeah exactly. There are limitations to what you can buy for the sake of society in general. It’s the same principle of anything illegal.


Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.


Arguments have two positions, so far the OP has yet to stake a position, just whats to ask bullshit questions thinking he's some how being clever. Not going to play that game.

.
 
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
In other words you’re unable to debate the topic using substance and intellect. Why are you wasting our time
Baloney..............the Socialist steal from us to hand out to others is correct............

So........have you seen my dang wallet or what...............

Now go on about interesting debate on how the theft of others money is good for us. LOL
I’m not a socialist. I’m just looking for any smart answers to the OPs questions and you seem to just want to insult and drive the conversation off topic.
 
Yeah exactly. There are limitations to what you can buy for the sake of society in general. It’s the same principle of anything illegal.


Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.


Arguments have two positions, so far the OP has yet to stake a position, just whats to ask bullshit questions thinking he's some how being clever. Not going to play that game.

.
It’s not a game to ask questions. You seem frustrated. Is that because you can’t come up with good answers?
 
Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
In other words you’re unable to debate the topic using substance and intellect. Why are you wasting our time
Baloney..............the Socialist steal from us to hand out to others is correct............

So........have you seen my dang wallet or what...............

Now go on about interesting debate on how the theft of others money is good for us. LOL
I’m not a socialist. I’m just looking for any smart answers to the OPs questions and you seem to just want to insult and drive the conversation off topic.
Oh.............PC answers................for the theft of our money through taxation ..................

Thanks for playing........Socialism always ends the same way............disaster..........bye bye..........
 
Bullshit, society doesn't pay my utility bills, now admit my freedom to purchase what I want is limited by your socialist crap. All you goddamn nanny staters should be fucking deported. You're nothing but un-American POS.

.
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.


Arguments have two positions, so far the OP has yet to stake a position, just whats to ask bullshit questions thinking he's some how being clever. Not going to play that game.

.
It’s not a game to ask questions. You seem frustrated. Is that because you can’t come up with good answers?


I've given good answers, they best way for the feds to benefit the people is to get the fuck out of our daily lives and pockets. The OP doesn't think that's good enough.

.
 
Okay, but back to my original OP, what specific examples of non-socialist polices should we start doing? “More freedom” isn’t a solution to poverty or anything else.


You want to fix poverty, look to your fucking State, that's how it's supposed to work. The federal government isn't your mommy or daddy. Hell CA claims to have a large enough surplus to give health care to illegals, but they can't even take care of their homeless citizens.

.
Lol um okay so what “state” policies are non-socialist? You still can’t even give examples.


Individual freedom to live as you chose with the least government interference as possible. That would include not taxing everything in existence.

.
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
And...it’s because you have no idea how to answer the question.
 
You want to fix poverty, look to your fucking State, that's how it's supposed to work. The federal government isn't your mommy or daddy. Hell CA claims to have a large enough surplus to give health care to illegals, but they can't even take care of their homeless citizens.

.
Lol um okay so what “state” policies are non-socialist? You still can’t even give examples.


Individual freedom to live as you chose with the least government interference as possible. That would include not taxing everything in existence.

.
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
And...it’s because you have no idea how to answer the question.


I've provided answers and examples, you chose not to accept them.

.
 
Lol um okay so what “state” policies are non-socialist? You still can’t even give examples.


Individual freedom to live as you chose with the least government interference as possible. That would include not taxing everything in existence.

.
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
And...it’s because you have no idea how to answer the question.


I've provided answers and examples, you chose not to accept them.

.
Lol those were such lame examples though. None of them clearly define how they would better well being of Americans in general.
 
Individual freedom to live as you chose with the least government interference as possible. That would include not taxing everything in existence.

.
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
And...it’s because you have no idea how to answer the question.


I've provided answers and examples, you chose not to accept them.

.
Lol those were such lame examples though. None of them clearly define how they would better well being of Americans in general.

Well I tailored my examples to your lame intellect, freedom always improves the well being of Americans. After all, aren't we supposed to be the land of the free, not the land of wealth transfer?

.
 
Okay but you’re still not specifically defining what you are saying with examples.


And?

.
And...it’s because you have no idea how to answer the question.


I've provided answers and examples, you chose not to accept them.

.
Lol those were such lame examples though. None of them clearly define how they would better well being of Americans in general.

Well I tailored my examples to your lame intellect, freedom always improves the well being of Americans. After all, aren't we supposed to be the land of the free, not the land of wealth transfer?

.
Why can’t you just list more specifics? You’re just saying the usual flowery talking points that lack any substance.
 
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.
Have you seen my wallet..............seems a socialist stole it.

Sums it up for me.............
In other words you’re unable to debate the topic using substance and intellect. Why are you wasting our time
Baloney..............the Socialist steal from us to hand out to others is correct............

So........have you seen my dang wallet or what...............

Now go on about interesting debate on how the theft of others money is good for us. LOL
I’m not a socialist. I’m just looking for any smart answers to the OPs questions and you seem to just want to insult and drive the conversation off topic.
Oh.............PC answers................for the theft of our money through taxation ..................

Thanks for playing........Socialism always ends the same way............disaster..........bye bye..........
Hahaha. You kidding me? I literally just said I’m not a socialist and you think you won some
Kind of argument? If you can’t answer simple questions then you don’t belong here anyways
 
Don’t get emotional... just stick to the topic and answer the questions. This has been an interesting read


Fuck off commie, at least for now, I'm free to chose what questions I answer.

.
True you’re free to dodge and weave and get all emotional if you want but that’s just a waste of time. If you want to win the argument then stick to the topic, otherwise you just sound like a fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.


Arguments have two positions, so far the OP has yet to stake a position, just whats to ask bullshit questions thinking he's some how being clever. Not going to play that game.

.
It’s not a game to ask questions. You seem frustrated. Is that because you can’t come up with good answers?


I've given good answers, they best way for the feds to benefit the people is to get the fuck out of our daily lives and pockets. The OP doesn't think that's good enough.

.
The OP didn’t ask for the best way to benefit the Feds. The question was what conservative policies are designed to be if it the well being of the people?
 
Post is so stupid no one cares to comment. I threw you a bone out of embarrassment for you.

Late at night Billy argues like a 13 yo girl. I don't know why

ETA: Wait, of course I know why. He's a Leftist....it's all he's got. EMOTION
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top