Why do Dems have so many dumb people

[Leweman]

in such high places? Nancy Pelosi. Joe Biden. And now Debbie Wasserman-Shulz.
This obviously isn't the first moment of stupidity this woman has had. At least the supposed dumb women in the Republican party are good looking.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz battles Wolf Blitzer on Paul Ryan’s Medicare | Video | TheBlaze.com

 

[jillian]

when calling other people dumb, one should probably spell their names correctly.

that would be Wasserman-Shultz.

you can now continue with your rant.

 

[Plasmaball]

I find it funny how partisan hack guy calls other people dumb.
you child.

 

[PredFan]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

 

[Moonglow]

when calling other people dumb, one should probably spell their names correctly.

that would be Wasserman-Shultz.

you can now continue with your rant.

But now it makes the OP look dumb, how could you do that!? He is really trying to be all serious and you just dumped on him for being dumb and not double checking his work, how dumb can you be Jill?

 

[Moonglow]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

well I wouldna go so far to say they are dumb, they are rich and prosperous people and you just have class envy.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The median income of a Medicare recipient is 23,000. Paul Ryan wants to add 6,000 to the cost of that person's healthcare,

while lowering Romney's effective tax rate to 1%.

If you support that, I don't think you're the smart one in the smart/dumb equation.

 

[Warrior102]

The median income of a Medicare recipient is 23,000. Paul Ryan wants to add 6,000 to the cost of that person's healthcare,

while lowering Romney's effective tax rate to 1%.

If you support that, I don't think you're the smart one in the smart/dumb equation.

Your facts are incorrect, dumb fuck.

Key Elements of Mitt’s Plan

•Nothing changes for current seniors or those nearing retirement
•Medicare is reformed as a premium support system, meaning that existing spending is repackaged as a fixed-amount benefit to each senior that he or she can use to purchase an insurance plan
•All insurance plans must offer coverage at least comparable to what Medicare provides today
•If seniors choose more expensive plans, they will have to pay the difference between the support amount and the premium price; if they choose less expensive plans, they can use any leftover support to pay other medical expenses like co-pays and deductibles
•“Traditional” fee-for-service Medicare will be offered by the government as an insurance plan, meaning that seniors can purchase that form of coverage if they prefer it; however, if it costs the government more to provide that service than it costs private plans to offer their versions, then the premiums charged by the government will have to be higher and seniors will have to pay the difference to enroll in the traditional Medicare option
•Lower income seniors will receive more generous support to ensure that they can afford coverage; wealthier seniors will receive less support
•Competition among plans to provide high quality service while charging low premiums will hold costs down while also improving the quality of coverage enjoyed by seniors

 

[Dutch]

in such high places? Nancy Pelosi. Joe Biden. And now Debbie Wasserman-Shulz.
This obviously isn't the first moment of stupidity this woman has had. At least the supposed dumb women in the Republican party are good looking.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz battles Wolf Blitzer on Paul Ryan’s Medicare | Video | TheBlaze.com

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

 

[PredFan]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

well I wouldna go so far to say they are dumb, they are rich and prosperous people and you just have class envy.

One of the two failures in your "theory" is that I'm rich and prosperous as well, and am not envious at all. The other is you belief that all rich and prosperous people are smart.

 

[PredFan]

in such high places? Nancy Pelosi. Joe Biden. And now Debbie Wasserman-Shulz.
This obviously isn't the first moment of stupidity this woman has had. At least the supposed dumb women in the Republican party are good looking.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz battles Wolf Blitzer on Paul Ryan’s Medicare | Video | TheBlaze.com

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

The GOP does not deride higher education, that's complete bull shit, most conservatives don't believe Global Warming is a myth, we just don't believe that man is the cause (it's the sun stupid), and very few believe that dinosaurs and men were contemporaneous. So you are an example of what the OP was talking about.

 

[Dutch]

The median income of a Medicare recipient is 23,000. Paul Ryan wants to add 6,000 to the cost of that person's healthcare,

while lowering Romney's effective tax rate to 1%.

If you support that, I don't think you're the smart one in the smart/dumb equation.

Your facts are incorrect, dumb fuck.

Key Elements of Mitt’s Plan

•Nothing changes for current seniors or those nearing retirement•Medicare is reformed as a premium support system, meaning that existing spending is repackaged as a fixed-amount benefit to each senior that he or she can use to purchase an insurance plan
•All insurance plans must offer coverage at least comparable to what Medicare provides today
•If seniors choose more expensive plans, they will have to pay the difference between the support amount and the premium price; if they choose less expensive plans, they can use any leftover support to pay other medical expenses like co-pays and deductibles
•“Traditional” fee-for-service Medicare will be offered by the government as an insurance plan, meaning that seniors can purchase that form of coverage if they prefer it; however, if it costs the government more to provide that service than it costs private plans to offer their versions, then the premiums charged by the government will have to be higher and seniors will have to pay the difference to enroll in the traditional Medicare option
•Lower income seniors will receive more generous support to ensure that they can afford coverage; wealthier seniors will receive less support
•Competition among plans to provide high quality service while charging low premiums will hold costs down while also improving the quality of coverage enjoyed by seniors

One thing I do not understand. If their plan is so great, why not implement it now? Why do they pander to Seniors over the age of 55? Wouldn't they want to get in on this fabulous voucher system?

 

[Plasmaball]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

Irony coming from you.

 

[Plasmaball]

in such high places? Nancy Pelosi. Joe Biden. And now Debbie Wasserman-Shulz.
This obviously isn't the first moment of stupidity this woman has had. At least the supposed dumb women in the Republican party are good looking.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz battles Wolf Blitzer on Paul Ryan’s Medicare | Video | TheBlaze.com

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

The GOP does not deride higher education, that's complete bull shit, most conservatives don't believe Global Warming is a myth, we just don't believe that man is the cause (it's the sun stupid), and very few believe that dinosaurs and men were contemporaneous. So you are an example of what the OP was talking about.

Lol oh god you don't live in reality.

 

[PredFan]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

Irony coming from you.

Thanks for posting and showing how correct the OP is.

 

[jillian]

Many reasons, among them:

1. They are in control of public education, which is failing our children on purpose.
2. They cater to the basest of emotions and being emotional is easier than thinking.
3. The ignorant and stupid require someone to take care of them, and the DNC promises to do that.
4. Stupid and ignorant people elect stupid and ignorant politicians.

i'll be sure to alert warren buffet to your "opinion".

 

[Dutch]

in such high places? Nancy Pelosi. Joe Biden. And now Debbie Wasserman-Shulz.
This obviously isn't the first moment of stupidity this woman has had. At least the supposed dumb women in the Republican party are good looking.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz battles Wolf Blitzer on Paul Ryan’s Medicare | Video | TheBlaze.com

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

The GOP does not deride higher education, that's complete bull shit, most conservatives don't believe Global Warming is a myth, we just don't believe that man is the cause (it's the sun stupid), and very few believe that dinosaurs and men were contemporaneous. So you are an example of what the OP was talking about.

When almost half the GOP electorate believe Obama is a Muslim or is not Christian, I think you are wrong.

 

[PredFan]

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

The GOP does not deride higher education, that's complete bull shit, most conservatives don't believe Global Warming is a myth, we just don't believe that man is the cause (it's the sun stupid), and very few believe that dinosaurs and men were contemporaneous. So you are an example of what the OP was talking about.

Lol oh god you don't live in reality.

Not in your reality, that's for sure.

 

[Some Guy]

I find it funny how partisan hack guy calls other people dumb.

you child.

That's funny.

 

[PredFan]

This comming from a person who affiliates with a party that derides higher education, believes global warming is a myth, and has people in it that believe dinosaurs and men existed together on earth like the Flinstones.

The GOP does not deride higher education, that's complete bull shit, most conservatives don't believe Global Warming is a myth, we just don't believe that man is the cause (it's the sun stupid), and very few believe that dinosaurs and men were contemporaneous. So you are an example of what the OP was talking about.

When almost half the GOP electorate believe Obama is a Muslim or is not Christian, I think you are wrong.

How does that prove me wrong? How is that even relevant? Where is your data on that? I think that the OP is right and you are exhibit "A".