shintao
Take Down ~ Tap Out
- Aug 27, 2010
- 7,230
- 361
- 83
It seems the Christians have a lot of animosity for anyone that doesn't agree with their mumbo jumbo black book, that is revised, cut into pieces, and missing tons of Gospels, like Injil, the Gospel of Jesus, and his right hand man the Gospel of Peter, and the Gospel of Jesus as a child. In fact there are many gospels the Christians ignored that didn't make their puzzle pieces fit nicely together. So if you are an inquisitive Christian, you might read what really happen with this man named Jesus, from witnesses like Peter and others. You will quickly learn why the Christian leaders fear the Quran. Jesus claimed he was the truth and the light, so if that be true, have no fear of learning the truth by the light.
Muslims regard the Quran as the main miracle of Muhammad, as proof of his prophethood. and as the culmination of a series of divine messages. These started, according to Islamic belief, with the messages revealed to Adam, regarded in Islam as the first prophet, and continued with the Suhuf Ibrahim (Scrolls of Abraham), the Tawrat (Torah or Pentateuch) of Moses, the Zabur (Tehillim or Book of Psalms) of David, and the Injil (Gospel) of Jesus. The Qur'an assumes familiarity with major narratives recounted in Jewish and Christian scriptures, summarizing some, dwelling at length on others, and, in some cases, presenting alternative accounts and interpretations of events. The Qur'an describes itself as a book of guidance, sometimes offering detailed accounts of specific historical events, and often emphasizing the moral significance of an event over its
narrative sequence.
Qur'an - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paul explodes: O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you (Gal 3:1)? -- Paul seems to have breached a clear injunction of Christ when the latter said: Whoever shall say Thou Fool, shall be in danger of Hellfire (Matt. 5:22). In Galatians 3:1, Paul is either stating a fact that Jesus was crucified and therefore abolished the law in his flesh (Eph. 2:15) by dying as a perfect sacrifice for sin OR he is lambasting the Galatians for disbelieving that Christ was even crucified at all. The latter would have flown right into Pauls face since the very foundation of his gospel rests on the supposed death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This would certainly explain his anger.
He comments: If Christ be not raised, your faith is in vain, ye are yet in your sins (1 Cor. 15:17); Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead, according to MY GOSPEL (2 Tim. 2:8). In fact, Paul is the actual founder of the religion that bears the title of Jesus. He admits this freely in 1 Cor. 3 According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder, I have laid the FOUNDATION, and another builds on it. We must question the source of Pauls revelation. While Jesus had power over demons and terrified them with his very presence, Paul admits that he regularly gets beat over the head by a messenger of Satan from time to time (2 Cor. 12:7). Is this how a saint or an apostle is supposed to be treated?
It seems as if the Nazarene disciples corrected Pauls erroneous teaching that Jesus was killed on the cross. God reveals in the Quran regarding Jesus: they killed him not, nor did they crucify him (an Nisaa 4:157). When the Passion of the Christ is removed from Christianity, the religion itself becomes absolutely worthless. The Gospel of Thomas was discovered in 1945 at Nag Hammadi and is believed by many Christians, including the Jesus Seminar, to predate the Gospel of Mark. In fact, the Jesus Seminar has dubbed this book as the Fifth Gospel. But why was it rejected as heresy and banned by the Church? The reason: NO PASSION NARRATIVE.
The Apocalypse of Peter was also discovered in the caves of Nag Hammadi -- So why was this book rejected and banned? Because it supports the substitution theory that Jesus was saved from the cross while another went in his stead. The Gospel of Peter met a similar fate by the Church because of its endorsement for Docetism (A first-century Gnostic movement that maintained that Jesus was merely a phantom who did not possess a physical body and therefore did not suffer on the cross). If Christians continue to uphold the authenticity of the canonical Gospels by maintaining that they were authored by towering figures of the first-century Jesus movement, then why do they reject documents penned by Peter, the chosen disciple of Christ?! Who can be more towering than Simon Cephas himself?
Injil - Gospel of Jesus
Muslims regard the Quran as the main miracle of Muhammad, as proof of his prophethood. and as the culmination of a series of divine messages. These started, according to Islamic belief, with the messages revealed to Adam, regarded in Islam as the first prophet, and continued with the Suhuf Ibrahim (Scrolls of Abraham), the Tawrat (Torah or Pentateuch) of Moses, the Zabur (Tehillim or Book of Psalms) of David, and the Injil (Gospel) of Jesus. The Qur'an assumes familiarity with major narratives recounted in Jewish and Christian scriptures, summarizing some, dwelling at length on others, and, in some cases, presenting alternative accounts and interpretations of events. The Qur'an describes itself as a book of guidance, sometimes offering detailed accounts of specific historical events, and often emphasizing the moral significance of an event over its
narrative sequence.
Qur'an - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paul explodes: O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you (Gal 3:1)? -- Paul seems to have breached a clear injunction of Christ when the latter said: Whoever shall say Thou Fool, shall be in danger of Hellfire (Matt. 5:22). In Galatians 3:1, Paul is either stating a fact that Jesus was crucified and therefore abolished the law in his flesh (Eph. 2:15) by dying as a perfect sacrifice for sin OR he is lambasting the Galatians for disbelieving that Christ was even crucified at all. The latter would have flown right into Pauls face since the very foundation of his gospel rests on the supposed death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This would certainly explain his anger.
He comments: If Christ be not raised, your faith is in vain, ye are yet in your sins (1 Cor. 15:17); Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead, according to MY GOSPEL (2 Tim. 2:8). In fact, Paul is the actual founder of the religion that bears the title of Jesus. He admits this freely in 1 Cor. 3 According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder, I have laid the FOUNDATION, and another builds on it. We must question the source of Pauls revelation. While Jesus had power over demons and terrified them with his very presence, Paul admits that he regularly gets beat over the head by a messenger of Satan from time to time (2 Cor. 12:7). Is this how a saint or an apostle is supposed to be treated?
It seems as if the Nazarene disciples corrected Pauls erroneous teaching that Jesus was killed on the cross. God reveals in the Quran regarding Jesus: they killed him not, nor did they crucify him (an Nisaa 4:157). When the Passion of the Christ is removed from Christianity, the religion itself becomes absolutely worthless. The Gospel of Thomas was discovered in 1945 at Nag Hammadi and is believed by many Christians, including the Jesus Seminar, to predate the Gospel of Mark. In fact, the Jesus Seminar has dubbed this book as the Fifth Gospel. But why was it rejected as heresy and banned by the Church? The reason: NO PASSION NARRATIVE.
The Apocalypse of Peter was also discovered in the caves of Nag Hammadi -- So why was this book rejected and banned? Because it supports the substitution theory that Jesus was saved from the cross while another went in his stead. The Gospel of Peter met a similar fate by the Church because of its endorsement for Docetism (A first-century Gnostic movement that maintained that Jesus was merely a phantom who did not possess a physical body and therefore did not suffer on the cross). If Christians continue to uphold the authenticity of the canonical Gospels by maintaining that they were authored by towering figures of the first-century Jesus movement, then why do they reject documents penned by Peter, the chosen disciple of Christ?! Who can be more towering than Simon Cephas himself?
Injil - Gospel of Jesus