Why Coakley SUCKS!

[GHook93]

(1) Amirault:
It has been proven time and time again that he is innocent! Heck she even allowed some of the female falsely accused women to get out of jail. Yet she kept Gerald to rot in jail, solely for political gain. She wanted to show she was tough on child molesters (doesn't matter that they are innocent). Didn't matter that clemency had been recommended unanimously by the Massachusetts Parole Board! She could help ruin a man's life for political gain!
Gerald Amirault - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(2) 23 month old rape Victim:
The bitch dropped the ball INTENTIOANLLY here! A police officer RAPED his 23 month old neice. Just typing that makes extremely angry. Yet Coakley does NOTHING INTENTIONALLY even with over-whelming indisputable evidence, BECAUSE once again for political gain. She didn't want to take on a BAD cop. Imagine how tough she will be on Islamofacism. Probably put her head in the sand. What happen after the NEW and more COMPETENT DA picked up the case? He prosecuted this son of a bitch and go that SOB a life sentence!

Recap, she can be tough on a innocent and falsely accused man, but not prosecute a child raping Police Officer (a man who I hope gets raped and murdered in jail), all for political gain. That sounds like the Chicago way.

Some saw Coakley as lax on ’05 rape case - The Boston Globe
Three weeks after the rape, on Nov. 7, Winfield gave his interview to Melrose detectives, saying he was alone with the toddler for about an hour on the day of the crime. He also said, “I would have never, ever, ever, ever wanted to take on another child,’’ a statement that was later used by prosecutors at trial to show that Winfield’s commitment to care for his niece was an intolerable burden and, therefore, a motivation to harm her.

The following January, after neither Melrose police nor Coakley’s office had taken any public action against Winfield, Frisoli wrote to an assistant district attorney saying that he and the toddler’s mother planned to pursue charges on their own.

“I believe I already have enough evidence for the issuance of a complaint,’’ Frisoli wrote, “and do not intend to allow them to go unprosecuted.’’

In response, Coakley’s office contacted Frisoli and assured him that the case would go before a grand jury. Yet, months later, after presenting testimony, Coakley’s office decided that “additional time was needed to determine the legal sufficiency of the evidence’’ and did not ask the grand jury to take action.

By that time, Frisoli had announced his plans to run against Coakley for attorney general. On July 10, he followed through with his promise to have the toddler’s mother file applications for criminal complaints against Winfield and his wife. A magistrate’s hearing was set for Aug. 1.

“To me, it was a ploy and a political stunt to promote his own race for attorney general,’’ Coakley said in the interview. Coakley also said she believed Frisoli was “trying to have his cake and eat it, too,’’ by accusing her of foot-dragging while knowing that if indictments were issued, he could claim credit for prompting her to take action.

Coakley’s office presented the case to another grand jury, offering previously submitted testimony along with new evidence that included telephone records and information about Winfield’s employment history.

In late July, that grand jury issued the two rape and two assault and battery indictments against Winfield and, on Aug. 1, the day the hearing on the applications for criminal complaints was to have taken place, Winfield was arraigned and released on personal recognizance.

Coakley said that her office did not ask for a dangerousness hearing - a proceeding in which prosecutors may request pretrial incarceration by arguing that the accused presents a danger to the community - because Winfield did not show any sign of being a repeat offender or sexual predator. It would take another 15 months and a new district attorney, Gerard T. Leone Jr., before Winfield was convicted and sentenced to prison. Winfield appeared voluntarily for trial, generally meeting the terms of his release.

Recently, the question of bail in child rape cases made local headlines when a Kingston man was accused of raping a 3-year-old girl while free on $10,000 cash bail, which was imposed after an earlier charge of breaking and entering and raping a 5-year-old girl. Prosecutors had recommended $200,000 cash bail after the first alleged rape, but a judge would not agree to it.

Following the Kingston incidents, state Representative Karyn E. Polito, a Shrewsbury Republican, filed legislation that would require prosecutors to request a dangerousness hearing in all child rape cases.

“What happened to this little girl is horrendous,’’ said Polito, referring to Winfield’s niece.