nitroz
INDEPENDENTly ruthless
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
Get another job.
people aren't hiring
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
Get another job.
Gosh, you act as if that vouches for the rest of the private workforce.
Turns out conservationism and right winged motives tries to milk it as much as they can in terms of vacation days, jobs, and wages.
Now what?
The same guys who are giving you all of these privileges are tapping the American workforce dry.
Sorry bub, I don't consider the benefits I earn to be "milking as much as I can". They were negotiated as part of my compensation package in a voluntary arrangement.
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
So now do you see why people are pushing for regulations? If the private sector refuses to voluntarily do it, then we are going to do something about it.
Every country is at a LEGISLATED vacation mandate of ~ 5 weeks per year, +/- 1 or 2, except the USA, where there is no vacation legislation for workers, and the ridiculously low 2 weeks is a "gift". Why are Americans so freakishly different again? And why do Americans love undercutting themselves this much?
There are many jobs out there that provide more vacation.
I've had jobs at 2 banks years ago...what sucked was we only had 2 weeks vacation and we had to take the whole 2 weeks at one time, we couldn't split it up!
The job i've now had for 20 yrs i do have 4 weeks vacation now (after 15 yrs). I can take more, but they're unpaid then. There's other companies that give you more time sooner....i guess i could have tried to find one of them. But i don't see what's wrong with "earning" more time off by working hard and just being a good employee. I know people at work that don't work, don't earn shit because they're lazy....they don't deserve time off, they take it at work!
Isn't the very idea of having to accrue and earn your vacation at work an odd concept? Other countries incorporate in in the job offer instead of playing this hidden catch-and-lose with it. The accrual/earn concept of vacations seems dishonest from the employer.
It's only dishonest if one doesn't believe that one should earn one's income.
Sorry bub, I don't consider the benefits I earn to be "milking as much as I can". They were negotiated as part of my compensation package in a voluntary arrangement.
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
So now do you see why people are pushing for regulations? If the private sector refuses to voluntarily do it, then we are going to do something about it.
Perhaps others should improve their skills and marketability so they have more negotiating leverage for a compensation package.
Really? Hard to believe. Which industry sector, and which state/region of the US?
Funny, my private sector employer provides 4 weeks of vacation per year, plus 12 holidays - all without the government mandating it.
I had so much at my last job, I literally couldn't use it all. When I left, I cashed out like 2 months.
I life in SF Bay Area and work in high tech.
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
Get another job.
people aren't hiring
Others don't get the same privileges, and are neglected and exploited. Usually they will be lucky to get barely above minimum wage and a week of vacation. (unpaid)
Get another job.
people aren't hiring
Isn't the very idea of having to accrue and earn your vacation at work an odd concept? Other countries incorporate in in the job offer instead of playing this hidden catch-and-lose with it. The accrual/earn concept of vacations seems dishonest from the employer.
It's only dishonest if one doesn't believe that one should earn one's income.
I agree that income should be earned. But is it an earnings question to divide that income between cash and free time? You can't usually negotiate your salary down for more vacation time, do you?
Really? Hard to believe. Which industry sector, and which state/region of the US?
I life in SF Bay Area and work in high tech.
So what you are in effect saying is "I got mine, screw the rest of you". Nice attitude.
In white, middle class jobs that not everyone is capable of doing, vacations are one of the "perks" you get. For workers in low tech fields where unemployment is high, there are no such "perks". There are long hours for little pay and if you take time off, you're easily replaced.
In order to cut costs and reduce overhead, even some hich-tech companies have simply let workers go and expected those whose jobs remain to work longer hours. One of my friends was in this situation. He went from working a 40 hour 5-day week to a 60-hour 6-day week simply so his company could make more money. His pay did not increase. Had my friend not been within 5 years of retirement, he would have left and gone elsewhere.
Perhaps others should improve their skills and marketability so they have more negotiating leverage for a compensation package.
Really? Hard to believe. Which industry sector, and which state/region of the US?
I life in SF Bay Area and work in high tech.
So what you are in effect saying is "I got mine, screw the rest of you". Nice attitude.
In white, middle class jobs that not everyone is capable of doing, vacations are one of the "perks" you get. For workers in low tech fields where unemployment is high, there are no such "perks". There are long hours for little pay and if you take time off, you're easily replaced.
In order to cut costs and reduce overhead, even some hich-tech companies have simply let workers go and expected those whose jobs remain to work longer hours. One of my friends was in this situation. He went from working a 40 hour 5-day week to a 60-hour 6-day week simply so his company could make more money. His pay did not increase. Had my friend not been within 5 years of retirement, he would have left and gone elsewhere.
There are many jobs out there that provide more vacation.
I've had jobs at 2 banks years ago...what sucked was we only had 2 weeks vacation and we had to take the whole 2 weeks at one time, we couldn't split it up!
The job i've now had for 20 yrs i do have 4 weeks vacation now (after 15 yrs). I can take more, but they're unpaid then. There's other companies that give you more time sooner....i guess i could have tried to find one of them. But i don't see what's wrong with "earning" more time off by working hard and just being a good employee. I know people at work that don't work, don't earn shit because they're lazy....they don't deserve time off, they take it at work!
Isn't the very idea of having to accrue and earn your vacation at work an odd concept? Other countries incorporate in in the job offer instead of playing this hidden catch-and-lose with it. The accrual/earn concept of vacations seems dishonest from the employer.
You belong to the infamous C O W S donchyahon?
Get another job.
people aren't hiring
This is BS. You may not find the perfect job that offers benefits and vacation, but if you need money to provide for your family somebody is always hiring. I have worked jobs where I was the only non-felon there. If they can get jobs anybody can.
people aren't hiring
This is BS. You may not find the perfect job that offers benefits and vacation, but if you need money to provide for your family somebody is always hiring. I have worked jobs where I was the only non-felon there. If they can get jobs anybody can.
Past tense.
Not present. Most of the unemployed can't even get a bottom of the line job despite desperately trying.
This is BS. You may not find the perfect job that offers benefits and vacation, but if you need money to provide for your family somebody is always hiring. I have worked jobs where I was the only non-felon there. If they can get jobs anybody can.
Past tense.
Not present. Most of the unemployed can't even get a bottom of the line job despite desperately trying.
Just curious: why do you think that employers aren't willing to create more jobs?
Past tense.
Not present. Most of the unemployed can't even get a bottom of the line job despite desperately trying.
Just curious: why do you think that employers aren't willing to create more jobs?
Because they aren't. We've seen countless examples of that.
Jobs keep going overseas.
people aren't hiring
This is BS. You may not find the perfect job that offers benefits and vacation, but if you need money to provide for your family somebody is always hiring. I have worked jobs where I was the only non-felon there. If they can get jobs anybody can.
Past tense.
Not present. Most of the unemployed can't even get a bottom of the line job despite desperately trying.
That's why getting a good education is important. Did you tell him that?
And his former employers got screwed in the bargain. I call that a win/win.