link about this Why he must leave : "These people do not rest(base). Do not stop(arrest). Do not blow. These people have a leader, George W. Bush, and a program. An outfit next to which Ronald Reagan's reforms make small player: a justice colonized by conservative judges, who carry(wear) their religion over the shoulder; a Supreme Court populated with liegemen, to the right quite; a legal system strengthened by Patriot Act of limitation of the liberties in the name of the antiterrorism, which, sees out and developed the muscle, laughs as at a bad luck of the rights of the persons; a " major fiscal reform ", to resume(to take back) the word of Bush's close, where the injustice competes for him(it) in the irresponsible; a partial privatization of the pensions and an appeal always wider in the private for the health insurance;A foreign policy led(driven) by a president who " will not try to obtain a permission to defend(forbid) the Americans " (dixit Dick Cheney) but who has already lost 1000 of his soldiers on the Iraqi ground; a crusade against the terrorism which, although justified in its foundations, is incapable to extirpate the Islamic germ of Al-Qaida and managed of the miracle to encourage its metastases; a refusal to involve in the regulation(payment) of the Israeli-Palistinian conflict which returns the peace impossible for the Middle East. When the rest of the world looks four years of bushisme, it is the balance sheet(assessment) which seems to him(her) appalling: an unprecedented isolation on the world scene(stage); a leadership of unequalled arrogance; a fretful and intolerant religiosity; A social and fiscal policy always more inequitable; a company(society) where the number of persons without health insurance reaches(affects) 43 millions (in increase of 5 millions); a total contempt for the environment. But the most worrying is to come. Whether it is in economy (see p. 20), company(society) (p. 12), or in international politics(policy) (p. 26), George W. Bush's conservative revolution is far from being finished. Will his(her) partisans moreover be ever satisfied? We can rely on the zeal of missionary of the ideologists of the White House not to stop(arrest) in the middle of the ford. It is indeed it who(which) terrifies half of the United States and who worries, in France and in the world, the friends about the biggest of the democracies. Contrary to the election of 2000, when certain Greens banked cynically on Bush's victory to give a boost to their troops, there is not any more today than a handle of partisans of Ralph Nader to see in this election that a political event. Advertisement The majority of the Americans, in a camp as in the other one, understood well the stake in this confrontation not as the others: it is, more than ever, about a choice of society." from the website of the "nouvel observateur". I use the translator of the site. So, when some words are in (), you have to choice between this one and the before word for the good sense.