Why Are White Guys So Paranoid?

[ptbw forever]

You have it ass backwards.

Married white men were banging black women, either because they weren't satisfied with their wives and fell in love with that particular black woman, or because they were womanizers surrounded by women with no ability to legally or socially defend themselves that "didn't count" as cheating.The old saying that you "aren't a man until you split dark oak" didn't come from white men who preferred black women, it came from white men literally hitting puberty and making sexual advances on black females who "couldn't be raped" and who were effectively tests for having normal sexual relations with white females.

Anti-miscegenation laws existed mostly out of principle because America was founded as a white nation with seemingly temporary black slaves who would presumably be sent back to Africa eventually. The only white people who were actually scared of black people stealing their spouse were white women who literally watched as their husband kicked them out of bed because black slave women had nothing to lose and everything to gain by developing any kind of relationship they could with their masters or the master's sons.

You fucking idiot. Here is the proof. It specifically calls out white women.

Slavery and the Law in Virginia



1691 - Any white person married to a black or mulatto is banished and a systematic plan is established to capture "outlying slaves."

• If an outlying slave is killed while resisting capture, the owner receives financial compensation for the laborer.
• Partners in an interracial marriage cannot stay in the colony for more than three months after they married.
• A fine of 15 pounds sterling is levied on an English woman who gives birth to a mulatto child. The fine is to be paid within a month of the child’s birth. If a woman cannot pay the fine, she is to serve five years as an indentured servant. If the mother is an indentured servant, she faces an additional five years of servitude after the completion of her indenture.
• A mulatto child born to a white indentured servant will serve a 30-year indenture.
• A master must transport an emancipated slave out of Virginia within six months of receiving his or her freedom.

They were doing everything in their power to keep white women away from Black men. ​

You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

But it did happen little boy.

At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law. Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.

At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.[21]

In 1871, Representative Andrew King (Democrat of Missouri) was the first politician in Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the Freedmen) as part of the process of Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.

In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.

Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:

No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...

Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.

... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy

— Congressional Record, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

Are you seriously too stupid to understand how much you just moved the goalpost?

Your idiot buddy claimed that married English women were frolicking around with black male slaves behind the master’s back and that this was the reason for anti-miscegenation laws when I clearly explained that not only did that not happen, but initially it was entirely about social cohesion as a white nation. They did not want white Englishmen impregnating all those helpless black female slaves or Irishmen and sometimes Irishwomen elevating the social status of those black slaves and debasing white people in the process. Your 1910s quotes also prove my point because I also said that it took until AFTER reconstruction before black males being with white women was considered a real problem.
Your own fucking Wikipedia entry proves how right I am in every fucking sentence and how dumb you retards are.

This is the reason why I say that you all were given everything you have because of white guilt. Both your IQs are literally 70, at best. You are functionally idiots, at best.

 

[ptbw forever]

You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

Obviously it happened and it happened a lot. You dont make laws against something that isnt happening you idiot.

They made laws because it damaged social cohesion, idiot.

America was a white country and black slaves were not yet citizens so they could be theoretically removed from the country at any time.

It wasn't until after reconstruction MANY years later that any semblance of black masculinity even began to show in society.

This child is a fool.

Everything I said is a fact that your own link proved.

 

[IM2]

Eleanor Butler - Wikipedia

Butler, who was of Irish origin, was an indentured servant to Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore.[1] At around 16 years of age she announced her intention to marry a man referred to only as "Negro Charles".[2] A 1664 Maryland law outlined the legal status of a free woman who voluntarily married a slave: she would serve the master of her husband until his death, and any offspring of their union would be born into slavery.[3][c] Despite this, Butler was determined to be wed.[1] The thought of a white woman becoming a slave apparently distressed Lord Baltimore somewhat, and he warned against the union for that reason.

She was a single Irish servant, so she was basically considered a upper class black slave. Irish people were treated horribly by the mostly English population in America at that time. The black guy undoubtedly treated her better than any English guy and she probably didn't see much difference between black guys and Irish guys on the account of their similar social condition.

That is hardly proof of married white women having sex with black male slaves willingly behind their husband's back. You are a fucking idiot.

I guess in all of your whitesplaining you didnt read this which just basically shot down your entire post?

"The thought of a white woman becoming a slave apparently distressed Lord Baltimore somewhat, and he warned against the union for that reason."

Hey dummy. Nice try. This example had nothing to do with married white women. Your claim was there was no laws against white women marrying Black men.

No, it didn't shoot down anything.

They couldn't legally enslave white people in most parts of the country and slavery was considered its own thing exclusive to black people, so the notion that a white person would officially be considered as low in social standing as a black slave was somewhat distressful.

This type of ignoramus is not supposed to exist in 2018 according to whites.

Projection from yet another historically illiterate dipshit....

You were shown history dumb cuck.

 

[IM2]

You fucking idiot. Here is the proof. It specifically calls out white women.

Slavery and the Law in Virginia



1691 - Any white person married to a black or mulatto is banished and a systematic plan is established to capture "outlying slaves."

• If an outlying slave is killed while resisting capture, the owner receives financial compensation for the laborer.
• Partners in an interracial marriage cannot stay in the colony for more than three months after they married.
• A fine of 15 pounds sterling is levied on an English woman who gives birth to a mulatto child. The fine is to be paid within a month of the child’s birth. If a woman cannot pay the fine, she is to serve five years as an indentured servant. If the mother is an indentured servant, she faces an additional five years of servitude after the completion of her indenture.
• A mulatto child born to a white indentured servant will serve a 30-year indenture.
• A master must transport an emancipated slave out of Virginia within six months of receiving his or her freedom.

They were doing everything in their power to keep white women away from Black men. ​

You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

But it did happen little boy.

At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law. Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.

At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.[21]

In 1871, Representative Andrew King (Democrat of Missouri) was the first politician in Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the Freedmen) as part of the process of Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.

In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.

Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:

No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...

Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.

... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy

— Congressional Record, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

Are you seriously too stupid to understand how much you just moved the goalpost?

Your idiot buddy claimed that married English women were frolicking around with black male slaves behind the master’s back and that this was the reason for anti-miscegenation laws when I clearly explained that not only did that not happen, but initially it was entirely about social cohesion as a white nation. They did not want white Englishmen impregnating all those helpless black female slaves or Irishmen and sometimes Irishwomen elevating the social status of those black slaves and debasing white people in the process. Your 1910s quotes also prove my point because I also said that it took until AFTER reconstruction before black males being with white women was considered a real problem.
Your own fucking Wikipedia entry proves how right I am in every fucking sentence and how dumb you retards are.

This is the reason why I say that you all were given everything you have because of white guilt. Both your IQs are literally 70, at best. You are functionally idiots, at best.

No dumb cuck. What it shows is what you say didn't happed, happened. And I doesn't support one ward of your dumb cuck foolishness. Young white boy you can't gaslight me. You don't have the knowledge or education to try me. What you should be doing is thanking me for using my valuable time trying to help your stupid cuck ass.

 

[Asclepias]

You fucking idiot. Here is the proof. It specifically calls out white women.

Slavery and the Law in Virginia



1691 - Any white person married to a black or mulatto is banished and a systematic plan is established to capture "outlying slaves."

• If an outlying slave is killed while resisting capture, the owner receives financial compensation for the laborer.
• Partners in an interracial marriage cannot stay in the colony for more than three months after they married.
• A fine of 15 pounds sterling is levied on an English woman who gives birth to a mulatto child. The fine is to be paid within a month of the child’s birth. If a woman cannot pay the fine, she is to serve five years as an indentured servant. If the mother is an indentured servant, she faces an additional five years of servitude after the completion of her indenture.
• A mulatto child born to a white indentured servant will serve a 30-year indenture.
• A master must transport an emancipated slave out of Virginia within six months of receiving his or her freedom.

They were doing everything in their power to keep white women away from Black men. ​

You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

But it did happen little boy.

At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law. Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.

At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.[21]

In 1871, Representative Andrew King (Democrat of Missouri) was the first politician in Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the Freedmen) as part of the process of Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.

In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.

Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:

No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...

Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.

... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy

— Congressional Record, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

Are you seriously too stupid to understand how much you just moved the goalpost?

Your idiot buddy claimed that married English women were frolicking around with black male slaves behind the master’s back and that this was the reason for anti-miscegenation laws when I clearly explained that not only did that not happen, but initially it was entirely about social cohesion as a white nation. They did not want white Englishmen impregnating all those helpless black female slaves or Irishmen and sometimes Irishwomen elevating the social status of those black slaves and debasing white people in the process. Your 1910s quotes also prove my point because I also said that it took until AFTER reconstruction before black males being with white women was considered a real problem.
Your own fucking Wikipedia entry proves how right I am in every fucking sentence and how dumb you retards are.

This is the reason why I say that you all were given everything you have because of white guilt. Both your IQs are literally 70, at best. You are functionally idiots, at best.

No clown. I said white women were frolicking around with Black males. Thats why they made the laws. If it was about cohesion as a white nation then they would have punished white men as well.

 

[ptbw forever]

You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

But it did happen little boy.

At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law. Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.

At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.[21]

In 1871, Representative Andrew King (Democrat of Missouri) was the first politician in Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the Freedmen) as part of the process of Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.

In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.

Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:

No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...

Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.

... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy

— Congressional Record, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

Are you seriously too stupid to understand how much you just moved the goalpost?

Your idiot buddy claimed that married English women were frolicking around with black male slaves behind the master’s back and that this was the reason for anti-miscegenation laws when I clearly explained that not only did that not happen, but initially it was entirely about social cohesion as a white nation. They did not want white Englishmen impregnating all those helpless black female slaves or Irishmen and sometimes Irishwomen elevating the social status of those black slaves and debasing white people in the process. Your 1910s quotes also prove my point because I also said that it took until AFTER reconstruction before black males being with white women was considered a real problem.
Your own fucking Wikipedia entry proves how right I am in every fucking sentence and how dumb you retards are.

This is the reason why I say that you all were given everything you have because of white guilt. Both your IQs are literally 70, at best. You are functionally idiots, at best.

No clown. I said white women were frolicking around with Black male slaves. Thats why they made the laws. If it was about cohesion as a white nation then they would have punished white men as well.

THEY DID, IDIOT.

Did you not read what your idiot friend posted?

The first anti-miscegenation law was made to prevent a IrishMAN from marrying a black female slave.

miscegenation ball - Bing images

Funny how a depiction of a “miscegenation ball” has all white men and black women in it if they were all just worried about black men and white women.

 

[Asclepias]

Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?

You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.

At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.

But it did happen little boy.

At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law. Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.

At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.[21]

In 1871, Representative Andrew King (Democrat of Missouri) was the first politician in Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the Freedmen) as part of the process of Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.

In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.

Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to African American heavyweight champion Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:

No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...

Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.

... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy

— Congressional Record, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503

Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia

Are you seriously too stupid to understand how much you just moved the goalpost?

Your idiot buddy claimed that married English women were frolicking around with black male slaves behind the master’s back and that this was the reason for anti-miscegenation laws when I clearly explained that not only did that not happen, but initially it was entirely about social cohesion as a white nation. They did not want white Englishmen impregnating all those helpless black female slaves or Irishmen and sometimes Irishwomen elevating the social status of those black slaves and debasing white people in the process. Your 1910s quotes also prove my point because I also said that it took until AFTER reconstruction before black males being with white women was considered a real problem.
Your own fucking Wikipedia entry proves how right I am in every fucking sentence and how dumb you retards are.

This is the reason why I say that you all were given everything you have because of white guilt. Both your IQs are literally 70, at best. You are functionally idiots, at best.

No clown. I said white women were frolicking around with Black male slaves. Thats why they made the laws. If it was about cohesion as a white nation then they would have punished white men as well.

THEY DID, IDIOT.

Did you not read what your idiot friend posted?

The first anti-miscegenation law was made to prevent a IrishMAN from marrying a black female slave.

miscegenation ball - Bing images

Funny how a depiction of a “miscegenation ball” has all white men and black women in it if they were all just worried about black men and white women.

You sound like a fucking idiot. The first miscegenation law was to keep white women from marrying Black men. I already posted it you fool!

How Interracial Marriage Laws Have Changed Since the 1600s

1664
Maryland passes the first British colonial law banning marriage between whites and slaves -- a law that, among other things, orders the enslavement of white women who have married black men:

"[F]orasmuch as diverse freeborn English women forgetful of their free condition and to the disgrace of our Nation do intermarry with Negro slaves by which also diverse suits may arise touching the [children] of such women and a great damage doth befall the Masters of such Negroes for prevention whereof for deterring such freeborn women from such shameful matches,"

LegalFlip.com - This Day in the Law

"Maryland enacted a law that was intended to prevent the intermarriage of Black men and English women. Subsequent to the passing of this anti-amalgamation law in Maryland, similar laws were passed in Delaware, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia."