Why are Republicans no longer concerned with Chinese money in elections?

[Synthaholic]

NOT "exactly".

Your OP, apparently, is claiming that Romney is receiving Chinese monies.
Link?

No, it's not.

Learn to read, wingnut!

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

 

[Liability]

No, it's not.

Learn to read, wingnut!

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

Synth:

Do you have ANY idea how IGNORANT that "comment" of yours was?

Well, here's a hint.

 

[Conservative]

No, it's not.

Learn to read, wingnut!

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

from the OP...

Now, Mittens could be secretly bankrolled by the Chinese government, and nobody would know for sure, due to Citizens United, and secret contributors.

THAT... is an implication, dumb ass.

 

[hortysir]

No, it's not.

Learn to read, wingnut!

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

Thanks
(I think)
I think I did misread.
You're right. If Mitt is getting questionable money from Chinese investors, I have just as much an issue with that as I did with Clinton's dinner parties and closed door meetings with Chinese donors.
Both are just as wrong.

Exactly!

We have no idea where the money is coming from.

NOT "exactly".

Your OP, apparently, is claiming that Romney is receiving Chinese monies.
Link?

Google the name Adelson for starters. Even he has stated that most of his money comes from Chinese casinos and he really needs MitWit to win so he can get out from under his own illegal dealings. OTOH, I recently read that he (or the Kochs? both? Bush's Brain for sure) were pulling out of Mitt's campaign because he's going to lose. Instead, they're putting more money into Congressional seats.

Sleaze. Pure sleaze.

Bottom line is that, if mitt were to win, he will be owned by big money.

Obama, however, has received most of his money in the form of personal checks in the amount of $250 or less. IOW, Big Business can't own him the way they do the R scum.

Now, please, resist the urge to twist everything I've written here.

Thanks.

Nothing to twist when we're talking about sour grapes.
In 2008 Obama's war chest was packed with Wall Street and Big Bank monies.
Now your party is heartbroken that these big givers are having buyers' remorse and are, now, giving their money to his opponent.
They thought Obama was going to "change the way things are done in Washington". They thought things were going to be steered to create a job-creating environment.
Nothing's happened.
Things may be creeping back. But only after things were made considerably worse.

These donors see a business-conscience Presidential candidate and a *very* number-savvy VP pick that know how businesses WORK.

I have yet to hear a plan from Obama-Biden.
Only "Romney wants to kill your wife" or "They want the rich to get richer".

Where is Obama's plan to improve anything?
He thinks things are great so, I assume, he plans on doing the same thing followed by the same thing .......... SPEND MONEY

 

[Synthaholic]

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

Synth:

Do you have ANY idea how IGNORANT that "comment" of yours was?

Well, here's a hint.

I saw a wingnut use it once.

I should have known better.

 

[Synthaholic]

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

from the OP...

Now, Mittens could be secretly bankrolled by the Chinese government, and nobody would know for sure, due to Citizens United, and secret contributors.

THAT... is an implication, dumb ass.

Look up the definition of 'could'.

 

[Synthaholic]

Technically, you implied it.

For Hortysir, I assume he just misread it, and I give him the benefit of the doubt, since he's proven in the past to have at least two working synapses to rub together.

You, on the other hand, are a moron. So get someone to explain the difference between saying something and not saying something.

Thanks
(I think)
I think I did misread.
You're right. If Mitt is getting questionable money from Chinese investors, I have just as much an issue with that as I did with Clinton's dinner parties and closed door meetings with Chinese donors.
Both are just as wrong.

Take a note, Conservative (the poster) - this is how a conservative with integrity behaves.