What is the motivation? Is it shadow confusion? Insecurity? Angst at the lack of control over others? There is a pretty solid consensus among OCTAs on here that I am pretty much the world's biggest idiot, yet they keep spending precious time and energy trying to force me into one corner or the other. Since I'm so unbelievably stupid, why would any one person care what I think? Why is it so hard to believe there are troofers like myself who truly don't have a conclusive opinion? Is it because OCTAs live in a bipolar world where one is either "for us or against us?" This logic is very apparent for 9E by the obsessive claim if one doesn't accept the OCT then by default one is a conspiracy theorist nutjack. When I say I don't know what happened that day, that is exactly what I mean. I don't see any conclusive evidence the OCT is accurate nor none that says it was a false flag op. OCTAs are forever complaining that I "won't take a stance." My stance is I have not reached a verdict. Why do I question the OCT more closely than anything else? Well, if it is the true account of what happened what else should I be focused on? I have pissed off other truthers on here just like OCTAs. I've also pointed out loose change is a fucking joke. I truly wish that organization would dismantle itself because its very existence is detrimental to the 9E discourse. Some probably want me to list the reasons why I question the OCT. What would be the point of such a list? There is a known pattern of not respecting what I have stated thus far regarding my position so it would be insane on my part to take the time to present a list when there is empirical evidence what I say about my own position is irrelevant. There is also a gag order on brainstorming and that is a vital tool in any investigation. So why can't OCTA's discuss the issue without obsessing over one corner or the other?