Why are all our professional sports leagues ran by communist?

GreatDay

Wasn't it?
Aug 21, 2012
436
37
16
I was just wondering what with all revenue sharing they do, did they all study at the Kremlin or something?
 
I though they were socialists!?

on here I was told it was communist, is there a difference between socialist and communist?

I've heard one supports private ownership and shared responsibility while the other is kind of heavy on the control aspect.... but I suppose it's quite complicated....
 
I though they were socialists!?

I thought I would link this here too, what the guy didn't get out was that Obama never said you didn't build your business, he said you didn't build the bridges and roads, But Republicans depend on telling people they have no right to have a say in things (through their government) they want all the control at the top like a corporation, every person who has ever owned a share of stock knows exactly how much the guys at the top care about what you have to say, and that's how the GOP likes it.

Fox's Beckel On Distortion Of Obama Comments: "Once Again, We Put Something On The Air That's A Flat-Out Lie" | Video | Media Matters for America
 
Last edited:
I understand why the cons are reluctant to come out, they don't like to think about all that wealth redistribution the big leagues do. They know that sometimes there is a Peyton or Eli but when it comes to their kid they don't want to take a chance, so they don't care what it does to the game, if they started for Bills, then their kid is too and the government got no say in the matter, so to speak.
 
.

Professional sports teams are franchises. Being a franchise means that you have to do what the parent company says per the terms of your franchise agreement. So there are many things you can't do, such as relocate your franchise, unless the parent company says you can.

So, for example, the NFL can dictate all kinds of rules, such as uniform uniformity (?), equipment requirements, etc. Like McDonalds, the parent company can also require and enforce all sorts of fees and financial rules per the operating agreement. If a prospective NFL franchisee doesn't like the fees and rules, they don't have to sign on the dotted line. The parent company can also distribute money as it sees fit to maintain its existence and profitability.

That's how franchises work. Rules are created and enforced by the parent company, not the government. So the NFL is an example of capitalism, not communism.

Did I really need to explain this?

.
 
Last edited:
Is this what the left has left?

It is a private enterprise, they have rules to ensure their product stays viable.

If someone really doesn't understand business and thinks socialists run sports, I can help with then being stupid.
 
I though they were socialists!?

I thought I would link this here too, what the guy didn't get out was that Obama never said you didn't build your business, he said you didn't build the bridges and roads, But Republicans depend on telling people they have no right to have a say in things (through their government) they want all the control at the top like a corporation, every person who has ever owned a share of stock knows exactly how much the guys at the top care about what you have to say, and that's how the GOP likes it.

Fox's Beckel On Distortion Of Obama Comments: "Once Again, We Put Something On The Air That's A Flat-Out Lie" | Video | Media Matters for America

The very first word out of Obama's mouth were:

Look, if you've been successful, you didn't get there on your own. You didn't get there on your own.

His theme was businesses, not roads and bridges.
 
.

Professional sports teams are franchises. Being a franchise means that you have to do what the parent company says per the terms of your franchise agreement. So there are many things you can't do, such as relocate your franchise, unless the parent company says you can.

So, for example, the NFL can dictate all kinds of rules, such as uniform uniformity (?), equipment requirements, etc. Like McDonalds, the parent company can also require and enforce all sorts of fees and financial rules per the operating agreement. If a prospective NFL franchisee doesn't like the fees and rules, they don't have to sign on the dotted line. The parent company can also distribute money as it sees fit to maintain its existence and profitability.

That's how franchises work. Rules are created and enforced by the parent company, not the government. So the NFL is an example of capitalism, not communism.

Did I really need to explain this?

.

Apparently you do for some folks. Good job!
 
.

Professional sports teams are franchises. Being a franchise means that you have to do what the parent company says per the terms of your franchise agreement. So there are many things you can't do, such as relocate your franchise, unless the parent company says you can.

So, for example, the NFL can dictate all kinds of rules, such as uniform uniformity (?), equipment requirements, etc. Like McDonalds, the parent company can also require and enforce all sorts of fees and financial rules per the operating agreement. If a prospective NFL franchisee doesn't like the fees and rules, they don't have to sign on the dotted line. The parent company can also distribute money as it sees fit to maintain its existence and profitability.

That's how franchises work. Rules are created and enforced by the parent company, not the government. So the NFL is an example of capitalism, not communism.

Did I really need to explain this?

.

So why do you think they do that wealth redistribution that looks a lot like communism, as you point out so clearly no body forces them to, do you think they know that without a little wealth redistribution the whole thing would just get too lopsided?

All you said is they can do it, but why do they do it?
 
Last edited:
.

Professional sports teams are franchises. Being a franchise means that you have to do what the parent company says per the terms of your franchise agreement. So there are many things you can't do, such as relocate your franchise, unless the parent company says you can.

So, for example, the NFL can dictate all kinds of rules, such as uniform uniformity (?), equipment requirements, etc. Like McDonalds, the parent company can also require and enforce all sorts of fees and financial rules per the operating agreement. If a prospective NFL franchisee doesn't like the fees and rules, they don't have to sign on the dotted line. The parent company can also distribute money as it sees fit to maintain its existence and profitability.

That's how franchises work. Rules are created and enforced by the parent company, not the government. So the NFL is an example of capitalism, not communism.

Did I really need to explain this?

.

So why do you think they do that wealth redistribution that looks a lot like communism, as you point out so clearly no body forces them to, do you think they know that without a wealth redistribution the whole thing would just get too lopsided?

All you said is they can do it, but why do they do it?


I did, see the bolded, red sentence above.

A business allocates resources as needed to remain viable and maintain a profit. So yes, if I were pre-disposed to communism, I would claim that, in that way, a business is communism.

.
 
Of course they're some kind of socialists.

The very smartest kind of socialists...capitalist socialists

They force the citizens pay for their stadiums while they get to keep the profits from their teams.
 
Difference is that team owners get together and VOTE on the changes they want for their leagues.

Plus they're Privately Owned so they can do what they want. OP is applying concepts to Private Industry that only apply to Gov't.
 

Forum List

Back
Top