Why are 99% of Hollywood, Liberals?

Michaal Medved had an interesting take. He basically said that there's no real line between what makes an actor/actress successful over someone else. So, it could boil down to pure luck that Samuel L. Jackson got a role over some other black actor that was vying for the same role that propelled him to stardom. It's not that Jackson is that much better, just right place, right time.

When you feel that success is little more than luck, you've found a home in the democrat party.


Well, the story is, Samuel L. Jackson had to do Geore Lucas from behind to get the role as Mace Windu. I guess he did a good job because he got the part....LOL

stock-photo-george-lucas-and-samuel-l-jackson-at-the-rd-annual-american-cinematheque-awards-beverly-107097185.jpg


Capitol+File+Hosts+White+House+Correspondents+IanlxBfLxAUm.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.
 
Michaal Medved had an interesting take. He basically said that there's no real line between what makes an actor/actress successful over someone else. So, it could boil down to pure luck that Samuel L. Jackson got a role over some other black actor that was vying for the same role that propelled him to stardom. It's not that Jackson is that much better, just right place, right time.

When you feel that success is little more than luck, you've found a home in the democrat party.
I've heard there's many aspiring stars of screen and stage are willing to "put out for a part". Again, this behavior lends itself to liberalism and sleaze.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.

are you saying there is no other way for these actors to hone their skills OR accept good vvs bad BUT had to have funding for certain programs to make them the actors they are? You dont believe anyone is a good actor based on their inherit skill THEY Have to have a program to prove it,

IF this is the best these programs can do, a lot of people should be thanking those programs because there are a lot of bad actors out there.
 
Speaking of Hollywood lib's, Streishand is begging for donations to obama. He has Hollywood on his side and people are begging?

I wonder about this?

I mean with all the money Actors/Actresses have, they could back Obama without blinking.

WHY go on TV/Internet to ask for financial support for Obama?

Oh they have no problem making donations... As long as the donations are made with other people's money.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.


Oh the poor poor acting students...no other way to make it in Hollywood since the Big Bad Conservatives want to save some cash in a much needed area.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.


Oh the poor poor acting students...no other way to make it in Hollywood since the Big Bad Conservatives want to save some cash in a much needed area.

we are not going to tolerate that, we are goign to waste money so bad actors can keep acting badly but go around parading themselves as someone who does something for all the money they make.
 
The answer to the OP's question is very simple to answer.

Hollywood is almost totally owned and controlled by the Jews; and most actors are Jewish.

Jews overwhelmingly are liberals and vote Democrat. :cool:
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.


Oh the poor poor acting students...no other way to make it in Hollywood since the Big Bad Conservatives want to save some cash in a much needed area.

we are not going to tolerate that, we are goign to waste money so bad actors can keep acting badly but go around parading themselves as someone who does something for all the money they make.

But...but...but...Will Smith deserves to speak since he turned down a full ride at MIT to chase his Hollywood dream. that idiot.
 
The answer to the OP's question is very simple to answer.

Hollywood is almost totally owned and controlled by the Jews; and most actors are Jewish.

Jews overwhelmingly are liberals and vote Democrat. :cool:


Which may be the reason Jon Stewarts' ignorant un-funny ass is trying to chime in on the debate.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.


Oh the poor poor acting students...no other way to make it in Hollywood since the Big Bad Conservatives want to save some cash in a much needed area.

Well, if you're in favor of the oil industry, you're probably going to vote for candidates that are favorable to the oil industry. Actors are no different. They tend to favor candidates that favor the arts.
 
Hollyweirds are sociopaths that's why they have to play characters they have no personality of their own.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.

are you saying there is no other way for these actors to hone their skills OR accept good vvs bad BUT had to have funding for certain programs to make them the actors they are? You dont believe anyone is a good actor based on their inherit skill THEY Have to have a program to prove it,

IF this is the best these programs can do, a lot of people should be thanking those programs because there are a lot of bad actors out there.

No.

What I'm saying is that if you're pro military, you are probably in favor of candidates that are pro military as well. If you pro NEA and developing future artists, you're for candidates that are pro NEA and further developing the arts.

The GOP's record in that area is not one that is viewed as favorable by Hollywood on the whole.


-------------

Why are you all so anti-wealthy people when they happen to be liberals?
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.


Oh the poor poor acting students...no other way to make it in Hollywood since the Big Bad Conservatives want to save some cash in a much needed area.

Well, if you're in favor of the oil industry, you're probably going to vote for candidates that are favorable to the oil industry. Actors are no different. They tend to favor candidates that favor the arts.

Both Candidates are in favor of the Oil Industry. where you been?

And Obama is not in favor of the Arts. He just wants the votes.
 
Well, if we're talking about actors alone, many (if not most) got their start in school programs that many conservatives would want to cut, do away with, abolish, etc... That is probably one reason.

Not to mention the funding for the NEA which is always a target of the right it seems.

are you saying there is no other way for these actors to hone their skills OR accept good vvs bad BUT had to have funding for certain programs to make them the actors they are? You dont believe anyone is a good actor based on their inherit skill THEY Have to have a program to prove it,

IF this is the best these programs can do, a lot of people should be thanking those programs because there are a lot of bad actors out there.

No.

What I'm saying is that if you're pro military, you are probably in favor of candidates that are pro military as well. If you pro NEA and developing future artists, you're for candidates that are pro NEA and further developing the arts.

The GOP's record in that area is not one that is viewed as favorable by Hollywood on the whole.

When have republicans cut a single dime from NEA?


Why are you all so anti-wealthy people when they happen to be liberals?
Nobody posting in this thread has said that they're against the wealth of Hollyweird celebutards....You're not the brightest bulb on the marquee, areya? :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top