Why all the sudden the "violence" rhetoric

[boedicca]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The Bot the bot the bot is back!
Stone cold stupid as a matter of fact!

 

[Liability]

Excuse me

The last time I remember shooting a right winger was back in the 80's.

It involved Reagan and an assualt gun ban was issued.

But you can shoot a lefty church up, close down their state campaign HQ by force, tear gas their demonstrations and throw rocks into their offices and we suppose to act as if it is part of a socialist wild imagination? You are kidding, right?

By the way, I disagree with Boortz reasons for discussion of violence. He raise interesting points that we can still discuss regardless of whos office is destroyed

That is one STARTLING admission.

And it's just the last one you REMEMBER?!?

Does that mean you've shot OTHER right wingers whom you DO remember shooting? How many? When? Where? Names? Reasons?

And you concede that there might have been others shot by you whom you can't quite remember?

Yessir. That is an AMAZING admission.

 

[manu1959]

the opposistion is violent they need to be silenced......

and such a short time ago speaking out and demonstrating in the streets and making movies about assasinating the president was patriotic ....

 

[AllieBaba]

The problem is that the right wing media stirred up the Tea Baggers into a rage as a way to stop healthcare. It makes good TV.

The problem is...what do you do to turn them off once they have started??

That's odd, I have yet to see anything on the tv which supports all this idiocy about the "violence" of the right.

 

[RodISHI]

So the tea partiers can do whatever they want and no one can say anything about it or its their fault?

You can say this until your blue in the face but it does not make it true. You can ignore the attacks on people, businesses and churches by the lefts pets and attempt to shove utter bullshit off on the peaceful protesters if you wish but truthfully it will get you no where. It just shows that you are so far out of touch with reality that you are blinded by your own hatred.

Violence has not been advocated by the masses protesting taxing the crap out of them and taking away their basic rights to freedom of choice. Saying that they will rise up does not equate to violence either although I'm sure that many who are looking the next election square in the face would like the voters to have some sympathy for them and their actions against the people in the next election.

 

[Jarhead]

Seems to me that the abortion subject has created a hell of a lot more violence than the Healthcare debate.
This is not new. It has been an issue for years.
The only difference this time around is that both parties are trying to use it for political expediency. Either that or both sides of congress are a spinless bunch of babies.
I think both sides of this debate in this thread needs to realize they are feeding into what their employees (congress) wants.
Prersident Obama should be ashamed of himself for adding fuel to the fire. He should get in front of congress and say enough is enough.

 

[Jarhead]

So the tea partiers can do whatever they want and no one can say anything about it or its their fault?

For the tea partyers or the GOP to say anything is adding to the myth that they are responsible for it.
Why aren't the democrats saying anything? Many of those that were against the bill before it was signed into law were democrats.
Neither should lend credecne to the actions by discussing them.

 

[csbarry]

It doesn't matter whether you're on the right or you're on the left, or in my case, looking for the best from either side; violence can erupt in any camp. It all depends on how disgusted or pissed off you've become. Regarding the Health Care Reform Bill, the right has its valid points, as does the left, as do I and those that think as I do. Had the lawmakers taken their time to get the package right, we and our children's children would have been much better off. It didn't have to cost the taxpayers anywhere near what it will had the lawmakers addressed the real problem; the financial raping of America by the insurance companies, their investors, and the medical community. But no, the lawmakers weren't going to go there; that would be killing the goose that lays the golden egg. So, you see, it wasn't the Democrats; it wasn't the Republicans; it was the lawmakers. They and theirs come first.

 

[rikules]

Ruby Ridge and Waco..

but NOT kent state?

NOT the firebombing of a black philly neighborhood?

NOT rodney king?

NOT cops gunning down a black woman with a cell phone in her hand?

NOT leonard peltier?

you cons really fkn suck...

 

[Zander]

I am not calling for violence, but I will not be surprised when it happens. Who knows? Maybe a couple of dead Senators and Representatives could be good for the country? The surviving Congress might remember whom it is they are supposed to represent.

Thanks for your example of right wing thinking.....

Exactly why Americans are repulsed by you

Repulsed? We'll see whose "repulsive" ideology is rejected come November.

PS -when are you going to change your user name to Leftwinger? Why the dishonesty?

 

[editec]

Real violence like gunshots and real threats are ignored if directed rightward.

I'm surprised at you Barach, you're usually a reality based poster even if I disagree with your analysis about what it all means.

But this myth you're trying to pass off as real?

It's nonsense.

 

[Claudette]

So the tea partiers can do whatever they want and no one can say anything about it or its their fault?

Why certainly.

The Tea Partiers can exercise their right to free speech and to assemble whenever and wherever they want to. If someone breaks a law they will pay the penalty.

Code Pink and other left organization has that same right.