Why against protection?

[Sirkarl101]

Why would any representative be against having the Consumer Protection Agency? It is for the good of all Americans.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Why would any representative be against having the Consumer Protection Agency? It is for the good of all Americans.

Why would any politician who is not after personal power do anything?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Why would any representative be against having the Consumer Protection Agency? It is for the good of all Americans.

Because some of them realize that all Americans are not helpless rubes that need dozens of government agencies to oversee every aspect of their lives.

 

[TheDecepticon]

Why would any representative be against having the Consumer Protection Agency? It is for the good of all Americans.

Because some of them realize that all Americans are not helpless rubes that need dozens of government agencies to oversee every aspect of their lives.

Yes, it's not like, say, any pharmaceutical companies have been found to put out UNSAFE drugs or anything.

Besides, CONZ like to allow unscrupulous business types to screw over unsuspecting consumers and fleece them of their money. Where would CONZ get their campaign contributions if not from letting a few screw over the many?

 

[Old Rocks]

Because the GOP is a wholly owned subsidiery of the Corperations. There aim is the Corperate States of America.

 

[Old Rocks]

We all like peanut butter and hamburger that kill the consumers. I mean, those dummies should have had a kit for testing for malicious bacteria, right?