Whose War Crimes?

Discussion in 'Israel and Palestine' started by abu afak, Dec 20, 2006.

  1. abu afak
    Offline

    abu afak ALLAH SNACKBAR!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,025
    Thanks Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Ratings:
    +474
    Whose War Crimes?
    December 11, 2006;
    Wall Street Journal
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116580099231046067.html?mod=djemITP

    A few scenes from modern warfare:

    Mohammad Abd al-Hamid Srour moved missiles across southern Lebanon under cover of a white flag.
    Hussein Ali Mahmoud Suleiman used the porch of a private home to fire rockets.
    Maher Hassan Mahmoud Kourani dressed in civilian clothes, hid his Kalashnikov in a tote bag and stored anti-aircraft missiles in the back of a green unmarked Volvo.
    The three men, all members of Hezbollah, were captured by Israel during last summer's war.

    Now their videotaped interviews form part of a remarkable report by retired Lieutenant Colonel Reuven Erlich of Israel's Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center. Relying heavily on captured Hezbollah documents, onsite and aerial photography and other first-hand evidence, the report shows how the Shiite group put innocent civilians at risk by deliberately deploying its forces in cities, towns and often private homes.

    Kenneth Roth, the executive director of Human Rights Watch, has accused Israel's military of "indiscriminate warfare" and "a disturbing disregard for the lives of Lebanese civilians." Mr. Erlich demolishes that claim, and in the process shows the asymmetric strategy of Islamist radicals.

    The most persuasive evidence here is Photographic, so we urge readers to access the report itself on the Web site of the American Jewish Congress (ajcongress.org). Hezbollah's headquarters in Aita al-Shaab, for instance, sits in the heart of the village. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah's office and home are in a densely built neighborhood of Beirut. In the town of Qana -- site of an Israeli bombing on July 30 that killed 28 and that Hezbollah's apologists were quick to label a "massacre" -- an arms warehouse can be seen adjacent to a mosque. There are photographs of rockets in the back seats of cars, missile launchers adjacent to farm houses, storage bunkers hidden beneath homes. There is also a trove of before-and-after photography demonstrating the precision of most Israeli bombing.

    The report also shows how the use of civilian cover was explicitly part of Hezbollah's strategy. "[The organization's operatives] live in their houses, in their schools, in their churches, in their fields, in their farms and in their factories," said Mr. Nasrallah in a TV interview on May 27, several weeks before the war. "You can't destroy them in the same way you would destroy an army."

    Exactly what Mr. Nasrallah means is illustrated in the testimonials of the captured fighters. Asked why Hezbollah would risk the destruction of civilian areas by firing from them, Mr. Suleiman replied that while in theory private homes belonged to "the residents of the village . . . in essence they belong to Hezbollah."

    Perhaps that's true; if so, then Human Rights Watch has no grounds to accuse Israel of atrocities when Mr. Nasrallah has effectively declared everyone and everything in southern Lebanon to be his fief.
    Our sense, however, is that not all southern Lebanese were delighted to have their livelihoods appropriated for Hezbollah's political purposes, even if they were too intimidated to register a protest. Either way, it is Hezbollah, not Israel, that is guilty of war crimes here.

    Beyond the war in Lebanon, these images suggest how Islamists seek to use the restraint of Western powers against them.
    They shoot at our civilians from the safety of their own civilian enclaves that they know we are reluctant to attack. Then if by chance their civilians are killed, they call in CNN and al-Jazeera cameras and wait for the likes of Mr. Roth to denounce America or Israel for war crimes.

    None of this means the U.S. shouldn't continue to fight with discrimination and avoid civilian casualties. But it means our political leadership needs to speak as candidly as Israelis now are speaking about this enemy strategy, so the American people can understand and be steeled against this new civilian battleground.

    .
     
  2. 90K
    Offline

    90K BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,204
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    in the back of GW in foggy bottom
    Ratings:
    +64


    The use of Terror is highly effective and has seen great results. But when warriors hide behind civilians they are wieners! Yes wieners because this is more than terror plot but a personal war about beliefs and it goes totally against all rules of war ever created since the beginning of time. What is more amusing is all the Muslims claim that there religion is so peaceful yet they at odds with themselves and then have issues with the West and Israel. So basically they are at war with the world and that is acceptable.
     
  3. Gurdari
    Offline

    Gurdari Egaliterra

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,019
    Thanks Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    the West
    Ratings:
    +40
    The Geneva convention provided some rules of war, but why expect an under-armed, guerrilla force to stand in the open against a much larger, more equipped army?
    Consider that when the 'good guys' are fighting in a different nation, self-defense means you do what you have to do... even if it means choosing a different path than the one your invading enemy would like.

    If Canada was invaded by foreign troops, I doubt I'd listen to their 'advice' of how to fight back. Nobody forces an invading army to kill civilians, there is always a choice. Perhaps, in Israel's case, respecting international law would go a long way to disarming radicals, after all - why give your enemies a legal leg to stand on, a rallying cry for more troops, or justification to throw restraint out the window?

    Force creates resistence. Ask any country with strict terror laws how they came about.
     

Share This Page