Who's The "Robot"...You or Rubio?

For those grabbing at straws trying to figure out a way to stop Rubio, here's a simple test to check yourself for robotics: For the rest of the day, ask yourself a dozen questions, and answer each question in a different way.....a hundred times. C'mon big talkers let's see you do it. Day after day, night after night. You can't. Nobody can. Eventually you'll settle on a comfortable answer and use it over and over again. If you don't, you'll appear to be stuttering, inept, and "not ready", or "robotic" same as Rubio. :eusa_whistle:

Most of the topics on this part of the forum are created by copy and paste parrots. Not a single original thought in their heads.

The responses to the topics are also programmed, and come straight from the rubes' favorite propaganda outlets.

Some of the most ridiculous shit gets posted here without the idiots engaging a single brain cell toward critically analyzing the nonsense they are posting.

Once a patently retarded idea gets written on the blank slates of their minds, there is nothing on Earth which will erase it. If they want to bleev it, it is true, no matter how much Reality contradicts that bleef.

Even worse are the topics with zero substance. Here's a photo of Clinton taken in mid blink. Let's make fun of her!


As for Rubio, he was busted giving the same canned response three times by Christie. He was burned. Christie landed a powerful punch and it hurt Rubio.

I understand politicians have to give the exact same speech at every whistle stop, and that has to be mind numbing. But to be called out by Christie for giving canned responses to different questions should have woken Rubio up. Instead, he kept doing it! The same answer to three different questions, while never answering the questions! It was a very stupid strategic mistake on Rubio's part.

However, anyone ridiculing Rubio for that, and is guilty of copying and pasting manufactured bullshit on this forum...well...
 
This is from December...BEFORE the debate where he fritzed...

'Watching a computer algorithm designed to cover talking points'


But once in a great while, a reporter notices the senator’s robotic qualities and is less impressed than his media brethren. For example, Erik Eisele, a reporter for the Conway Daily Sun in New Hampshire, spent some time with Rubio last week, and wrote soon after:

We had roughly 20 minutes with him on Monday, and in that time he talked about ISIS, the economy, his political record and his background. But it was like watching a computer algorithm designed to cover talking points. He said a lot, but at the same time said nothing. It was like someone wound him up, pointed him towards the doors and pushed play. If there was a human side to senator, a soul, it didn’t come across through.

That might sound like harsh critique, but in essence that is the point of the New Hampshire primary, to test candidates in a retail politics setting.
 
Take a stroll though the Google pages of them all endlessly repeating their talking points.....Christie in particular. Except Rubio nailed his fat ass to the barn in a prior debate about supporting gun control, Desotomayor, planned parenthood, and credit downgrades. Hopefully Rubio mentions the Christie bridge closure next time....a bully move to impress his mafioso pals.
 
Take a stroll though the Google pages of them all endlessly repeating their talking points.....Christie in particular. Except Rubio nailed his fat ass to the barn in a prior debate about supporting gun control, Desotomayor, planned parenthood, and credit downgrades. Hopefully Rubio mentions the Christie bridge closure next time....a bully move to impress his mafioso pals.
------------------------------------ the Bridge , agree as far as throwing rocks at the fat man !!
 

Forum List

Back
Top