Who's richer Republicans or Dems??

[Truthmatters]

so taxing rich people is theft but taking from everyone else is not?

 

[Jarhead]

Wait, so now I'm someone who has money and want to divide so I can have more money? I thought I was jealous of people who had more than me.

You are literally insane. You change your entire argument from post to post. I have NO clue what you are ever talking about.

Jeez...talk about selfish.

You have more money than God...err.....fish.....and you want to take from me to add to your stash?

Ummm, yeah. I want the government to support me but I want to divide so I can add to my wealth, and you're an ugly head. Ummm yeah.

If you can decipher what the hell he is talking about, I'd LOVE to know. You should see his posts from the other day where it was literally like two different people posting from his account in the same thread.Comedy gold I tell ya! Gold!

in general I see and agree with his premise.
There is a large MINORITY of people that want redistribution becuase they want to be able to buy "stuff" they want...not need.
There are a lot of people that would love a free ride....and they are all on the left (not to be confused with all on left are that way).

I know...I see it everyday in my business....

I have people weigh their job offers against their unemployment....I have had others insist on LESS salary so they can still get welfare and food stamps....yes...that is the God...er...fish honest truth.
If the salary brought them above a certain level, they insisted on less salary......
I had one client who refused to lower the salary....she turned the job down...and then tried to sue him for discriminating against the poor.
She did not win.....but the dam case was not tossed either.....so my client had to defend his actions at a great cost fo time and money.

 

[RDD_1210]

Nothing, youve been pegged. You wish to divide for confiscation. That is pretty lowlife in any book.

Wait, so now I'm someone who has money and want to divide so I can have more money? I thought I was jealous of people who had more than me.

You are literally insane. You change your entire argument from post to post. I have NO clue what you are ever talking about.

Heres the point since you wish to dance. Two men standing side by side. You cant decide if they should be treated equally until you see their wallet.

Now take you imaginary self proclamations of wealth and leave it out of the argument. Wanting others wealth is an old concept with humanity. It originates with jealousy envy and greed. That is where you draw from, how you try to remove yourself from that is of no interest to me. It goes back to the original theme

But I'm not jealous of anyone. I want people less fortunate than myself to be able to have a chance. I don't feel the current environment is conducive to people getting that chance. So like I said, very little of these policies I support would really do much for me directly, but I recognize that they would help a vast majority of the country. So again, that sort of kills your whole notion that I am only advocating these positions from a standpoint of pure greed.

 

[Jarhead]

so taxing rich people is theft but taking from everyone else is not?

taking more from someone becuase they have more so others can get more than they have is something that requires debate.

However, the way you say it closes the door to honest debate.

 

[RDD_1210]

Jeez...talk about selfish.

You have more money than God...err.....fish.....and you want to take from me to add to your stash?

Ummm, yeah. I want the government to support me but I want to divide so I can add to my wealth, and you're an ugly head. Ummm yeah.

If you can decipher what the hell he is talking about, I'd LOVE to know. You should see his posts from the other day where it was literally like two different people posting from his account in the same thread.Comedy gold I tell ya! Gold!

in general I see and agree with his premise.
There is a large MINORITY of people that want redistribution becuase they want to be able to buy "stuff" they want...not need.
There are a lot of people that would love a free ride....and they are all on the left (not to be confused with all on left are that way).

I know...I see it everyday in my business....

I have people weigh their job offers against their unemployment....I have had others insist on LESS salary so they can still get welfare and food stamps....yes...that is the God...er...fish honest truth.
If the salary brought them above a certain level, they insisted on less salary......
I had one client who refused to lower the salary....she turned the job down...and then tried to sue him for discriminating against the poor.
She did not win.....but the dam case was not tossed either.....so my client had to defend his actions at a great cost fo time and money.

What you said makes sense. His ramblings are that of an insane man. Thanks for translating that in to rational speak.

 

[Conservative]

so taxing rich people is theft but taking from everyone else is not?

taking more from someone becuase they have more so others can get more than they have is something that requires debate.

However, the way you say it closes the door to honest debate.

tm has never had an honest debate in her life.

 

[Full-Auto]

Wait, so now I'm someone who has money and want to divide so I can have more money? I thought I was jealous of people who had more than me.

You are literally insane. You change your entire argument from post to post. I have NO clue what you are ever talking about.

Heres the point since you wish to dance. Two men standing side by side. You cant decide if they should be treated equally until you see their wallet.

Now take you imaginary self proclamations of wealth and leave it out of the argument. Wanting others wealth is an old concept with humanity. It originates with jealousy envy and greed. That is where you draw from, how you try to remove yourself from that is of no interest to me. It goes back to the original theme

But I'm not jealous of anyone. I want people less fortunate than myself to be able to have a chance. I don't feel the current environment is conducive to people getting that chance. So like I said, very little of these policies I support would really do much for me directly, but I recognize that they would help a vast majority of the country. So again, that sort of kills your whole notion that I am only advocating these positions from a standpoint of pure greed.

Thats what you say as you call for the wealth of others.

Im not convinced. As I said I am not interested in how you try to remove yourself. We know where it originates.

 

[naturegirl]

your list, or the list you posted is FAULTY.

just off the bat, it has Christy walton as a democrat while all other waltons as republican and on christy where it says she is a dem, she donates 69,000 to repubs while only 11k to dems.

also, on cox communications, they have Dem listed for them when cox communications has been the right arm media for the republicans for years now.

and on Steve balmer they have listed as a Dem, yet he contributed more to the republicans.....

the whole list can not be used with all of those kind of claims that are off the wall....

also, there is no individual that has donated more to a political party than the $1.8 million Koch has donated.



I'd say that there are 50% wealthiest in the Dem park and 50% wealthiest in the repub park.

If you read the article you would have seen the disclaimer about this.

You did not give a link for any article Natural girl

you gave a link to the chart....

be happy to read the article, but ya gotta link to it.

I didn't realize the post wouldn't go back to the original article but I did post the link a little further down(in post 5). Here it is again: Richest People in America are Democrats

And here's the disclaimer. Correction: In the attached chart, Christy Walton was incorrectly identified as Democrat when in fact, she is a Republican. Still, this error doesn’t change the substance of the story. Democrats far outweigh Republicans in terms of income & stinginess.

Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat and switched to Republican to get elected. He recently declared himself an independent.

 

[RDD_1210]

Heres the point since you wish to dance. Two men standing side by side. You cant decide if they should be treated equally until you see their wallet.

Now take you imaginary self proclamations of wealth and leave it out of the argument. Wanting others wealth is an old concept with humanity. It originates with jealousy envy and greed. That is where you draw from, how you try to remove yourself from that is of no interest to me. It goes back to the original theme

But I'm not jealous of anyone. I want people less fortunate than myself to be able to have a chance. I don't feel the current environment is conducive to people getting that chance. So like I said, very little of these policies I support would really do much for me directly, but I recognize that they would help a vast majority of the country. So again, that sort of kills your whole notion that I am only advocating these positions from a standpoint of pure greed.

Thats what you say as you call for the wealth of others.

Im not convinced. As I said I am not interested in how you try to remove yourself. We know where it originates.

Sure, I want to see taxes raised on money earned over a million. Because that's what is currently on the table. No, that wouldn't affect me but when the Bush tax cuts were being debated I was advocating letting them expire, at least for those making over 250k, which would have impacted me. I was ok with that and vocally supported it because I understood that it made sense.

I honestly don't care what you're convinced of. I will tell you that I am convinced that you are insane and actively promote policies which will only hurt you directly.

 

[Jarhead]

But I'm not jealous of anyone. I want people less fortunate than myself to be able to have a chance. I don't feel the current environment is conducive to people getting that chance. So like I said, very little of these policies I support would really do much for me directly, but I recognize that they would help a vast majority of the country. So again, that sort of kills your whole notion that I am only advocating these positions from a standpoint of pure greed.

Thats what you say as you call for the wealth of others.

Im not convinced. As I said I am not interested in how you try to remove yourself. We know where it originates.

Sure, I want to see taxes raised on money earned over a million. Because that's what is currently on the table. No, that wouldn't affect me but when the Bush tax cuts were being debated I was advocating letting them expire, at least for those making over 250k, which would have impacted me. I was ok with that and vocally supported it because I understood that it made sense.

I honestly don't care what you're convinced of. I will tell you that I am convinced that you are insane and actively promote policies which will only hurt you directly.

I, too, actively promote policies that will likely not be in my best personal interest...but in the interest of my children and America overall.

Now, that being said, I have work to do...have a great day all.....

 

[Care4all]

If you read the article you would have seen the disclaimer about this.

You did not give a link for any article Natural girl

you gave a link to the chart....

be happy to read the article, but ya gotta link to it.

I didn't realize the post wouldn't go back to the original article but I did post the link a little further down(in post 5). Here it is again: Richest People in America are Democrats

And here's the disclaimer. Correction: In the attached chart, Christy Walton was incorrectly identified as Democrat when in fact, she is a Republican. Still, this error doesn’t change the substance of the story. Democrats far outweigh Republicans in terms of income & stinginess.

Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat and switched to Republican to get elected. He recently declared himself an independent.

Stingiest? since when is donating the least for political influence the stingiest?

Me thinks you have PROVEN that rich republicans try to influence our gvt with money MORE than Democrats....

and for me, that's something I can be proud of....wealthy democrats are the least reliant on our gvt doing what they want....while repubs pay through the yin yang for political influence.

call that stingy if ya want.....

 

[naturegirl]

You did not give a link for any article Natural girl

you gave a link to the chart....

be happy to read the article, but ya gotta link to it.

I didn't realize the post wouldn't go back to the original article but I did post the link a little further down(in post 5). Here it is again: Richest People in America are Democrats

And here's the disclaimer. Correction: In the attached chart, Christy Walton was incorrectly identified as Democrat when in fact, she is a Republican. Still, this error doesn’t change the substance of the story. Democrats far outweigh Republicans in terms of income & stinginess.

Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat and switched to Republican to get elected. He recently declared himself an independent.

Stingiest? since when is donating the least for political influence the stingiest?

Me thinks you have PROVEN that rich republicans try to influence our gvt with money MORE than Democrats....

and for me, that's something I can be proud of....wealthy democrats are the least reliant on our gvt doing what they want....while repubs pay through the yin yang for political influence.

call that stingy if ya want.....

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

Besides the thread was about who's richer, not who gives more to politicians.

 

[Care4all]

I didn't realize the post wouldn't go back to the original article but I did post the link a little further down(in post 5). Here it is again: Richest People in America are Democrats

And here's the disclaimer. Correction: In the attached chart, Christy Walton was incorrectly identified as Democrat when in fact, she is a Republican. Still, this error doesn’t change the substance of the story. Democrats far outweigh Republicans in terms of income & stinginess.

Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat and switched to Republican to get elected. He recently declared himself an independent.

Stingiest? since when is donating the least for political influence the stingiest?

Me thinks you have PROVEN that rich republicans try to influence our gvt with money MORE than Democrats....

and for me, that's something I can be proud of....wealthy democrats are the least reliant on our gvt doing what they want....while repubs pay through the yin yang for political influence.

call that stingy if ya want.....

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

okay, i see that bloomberg was not a lifelong republican, thanks for the correction....

is he a democrat now, as you claim?

 

[Care4all]

I didn't realize the post wouldn't go back to the original article but I did post the link a little further down(in post 5). Here it is again: Richest People in America are Democrats

And here's the disclaimer. Correction: In the attached chart, Christy Walton was incorrectly identified as Democrat when in fact, she is a Republican. Still, this error doesn’t change the substance of the story. Democrats far outweigh Republicans in terms of income & stinginess.

Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat and switched to Republican to get elected. He recently declared himself an independent.

Stingiest? since when is donating the least for political influence the stingiest?

Me thinks you have PROVEN that rich republicans try to influence our gvt with money MORE than Democrats....

and for me, that's something I can be proud of....wealthy democrats are the least reliant on our gvt doing what they want....while repubs pay through the yin yang for political influence.

call that stingy if ya want.....

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

Besides the thread was about who's richer, not who gives more to politicians.

oh, and I have no problems with the average citizen joes using groups or unions to express their will....do you?

 

[naturegirl]

Stingiest? since when is donating the least for political influence the stingiest?

Me thinks you have PROVEN that rich republicans try to influence our gvt with money MORE than Democrats....

and for me, that's something I can be proud of....wealthy democrats are the least reliant on our gvt doing what they want....while repubs pay through the yin yang for political influence.

call that stingy if ya want.....

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

Besides the thread was about who's richer, not who gives more to politicians.

oh, and I have no problems with the average citizen joes using groups or unions to express their will....do you?

Why yes then, the term "Evil Rich Repubican" isn't true. Looks like the Dems control more of the wealth.

 

[RDD_1210]

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

Besides the thread was about who's richer, not who gives more to politicians.

oh, and I have no problems with the average citizen joes using groups or unions to express their will....do you?

Why yes then, the term "Evil Rich Repubican" isn't true. Looks like the Dems control more of the wealth.

Ok, if thats the case then wouldn't you think that this class warfare stuff is nonsense since Dems are advocating policies that affect themselves the most?

 

[naturegirl]

oh, and I have no problems with the average citizen joes using groups or unions to express their will....do you?

Why yes then, the term "Evil Rich Repubican" isn't true. Looks like the Dems control more of the wealth.

Ok, if thats the case then wouldn't you think that this class warfare stuff is nonsense since Dems are advocating policies that affect themselves the most?

No they want the voting public to think the Republicans are the rich folks, they are lying and spreading hate. They are dividing us in to two groups, rich and poor. They don't want a middle class, they want total control. It's much better for them to make it look like it's all someone elses fault.

 

[Care4all]

Yea, no acknowledgement that you were wrong about Bloomberg. And yea, I also believe the Dems don't use the Unions and Acorns and their many organizations to hide political contributions.

Besides the thread was about who's richer, not who gives more to politicians.

oh, and I have no problems with the average citizen joes using groups or unions to express their will....do you?

Why yes then, the term "Evil Rich Repubican" isn't true. Looks like the Dems control more of the wealth.

i've never used the term ''evil rich republican'' ..... i don't use those kind of terms because i think they are ridiculous, and only meant to distract from real issues.....just like all the "liberal, hell bound, marxist, communist, socialist, stingy etcl" insults coming from the right wing towards the left......they come from immaturity.

 

[RDD_1210]

Why yes then, the term "Evil Rich Repubican" isn't true. Looks like the Dems control more of the wealth.

Ok, if thats the case then wouldn't you think that this class warfare stuff is nonsense since Dems are advocating policies that affect themselves the most?

No they want the voting public to think the Republicans are the rich folks, they are lying and spreading hate. They are dividing us in to two groups, rich and poor. They don't want a middle class, they want total control. It's much better for them to make it look like it's all someone elses fault.

Then how do you explain that the dems policies are going after increased taxes on the very rich? That doesn't fit in to your story.

 

[naturegirl]

Ok, if thats the case then wouldn't you think that this class warfare stuff is nonsense since Dems are advocating policies that affect themselves the most?

No they want the voting public to think the Republicans are the rich folks, they are lying and spreading hate. They are dividing us in to two groups, rich and poor. They don't want a middle class, they want total control. It's much better for them to make it look like it's all someone elses fault.

Then how do you explain that the dems policies are going after increased taxes on the very rich? That doesn't fit in to your story.

You're not paying attention to the other hand. So if the tax increases on the rich should happen to fail (surprise-NOT), the Evil Rich Republicans are the reason why.