Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If it became necessary. In other words, as a last resort. If we were to be fired upon first. If we were to be attacked in like fashion, and had no choice but to defend ourselves. Otherwise, no. It would probably mean the end of mankind if it were to ever happen. Once it starts, there would be no stopping until mankind was erased from the face of the Earth. It would contaminate food, water, land, air, and cause a thousand years of health issues. No one would escape. It would be total devastation. No winners, everyone would lose. But, in my opinion, sooner or later, some nut is going to hit the button. We have a lot of crazy people in this world, and some hold very high positions in world governments. It's very possible that it will happen at some point in time.There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
It's very hard to imagine a positive outcome of using nuclear weapons in a stretegic sense.There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
Ive not done the research or seen the thorough military research that concluded it resulted in a net saving of lives.
That is the only way I'd do it, is if a thorough research project was done ensuring its a net saviour.
There didn't seem to be any moral dilemma when Japan declared war on America and started killing us. The onus was on Japan, not the USA. And because of that, if bombing them is what it took to stop them from killing one more American, then our President did a good job.
Keep in mind that they were so intent on destroying us, that bombing them didn't stop their resolve, even at the expense of their own citizens. We had to do it again before Japan determined their murderous plan for us wasn't going to work.
There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
You asked under what circumstance would I support it.Ive not done the research or seen the thorough military research that concluded it resulted in a net saving of lives.
That is the only way I'd do it, is if a thorough research project was done ensuring its a net saviour.There didn't seem to be any moral dilemma when Japan declared war on America and started killing us. The onus was on Japan, not the USA. And because of that, if bombing them is what it took to stop them from killing one more American, then our President did a good job.
Keep in mind that they were so intent on destroying us, that bombing them didn't stop their resolve, even at the expense of their own citizens. We had to do it again before Japan determined their murderous plan for us wasn't going to work.
That doesn't really address the question.
That is a terribly emotional response, but understandable. The problem with actually doing that is you would have murdered untold numbers of innocent people, just as Truman did.There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
I was ready to nuke somebody when the first tower fell.
Then the answer is yes. If they declare war on us again, and start killing us again, then drop the bomb again.
You asked under what circumstance would I support it.Ive not done the research or seen the thorough military research that concluded it resulted in a net saving of lives.
That is the only way I'd do it, is if a thorough research project was done ensuring its a net saviour.There didn't seem to be any moral dilemma when Japan declared war on America and started killing us. The onus was on Japan, not the USA. And because of that, if bombing them is what it took to stop them from killing one more American, then our President did a good job.
Keep in mind that they were so intent on destroying us, that bombing them didn't stop their resolve, even at the expense of their own citizens. We had to do it again before Japan determined their murderous plan for us wasn't going to work.
That doesn't really address the question.
My paragraph #2 addressed it.
What else you wanna know?
Then the answer is yes. If they declare war on us again, and start killing us again, then drop the bomb again.
Who is "they"?
There is a lot of talk today, understandably on the 70th anniversary of the act, about the bombing of Hiroshima. It is a very complex moral and military question. I'm wondering if, regardless of your view of the decision 70 years ago, you would ever support the US making a similar decision under any circumstances today? If so, what would those circumstances have to be?
If Iran hits Israel turn them into glass
