Who really supports our Troops?

Why can't you? Sure, you'd need more people to do the work, but you've expanded the role of government, not just the workload.

And you've expanded the role of government far beyond what was designed.

The Constitution is written broad enough to allow future generations to decide what they want from the three branches of government defined by the founders. They never had an intent to try to tell future generations what was needed from government to meet their needs.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it say "limited government" but it does say a government that will provide for the general welfare.

The Constitution of today is defined by two hundred years of interpretations through the courts. We do not want 18th century politicians deciding what is best for 21st century America
Odd, since you and your side are trying your damnedest to turn 21st Century America into the 1958 Soviet Union.

In case you didn't hear, that little experiment failed. And no, it won't work when you try it, either.

1958 Soviet Union?

Seriously Dave...engage in hyperbole much?
 
I wouldn't think something so obvious would need any defense. It's like being asked to prove the sun comes up in the east. :confused:

Then the task should not be daunting at all.

And given that you have the opportunity here to enlighten someone so "un-enlightened", this may even be beneficial.

Right?

So procede.

Provide specifics..and facts.
As if you'll accept what I say.

Nevertheless:

The Left wants to control what people drive and how much electricity they use through Cap and Trade.

The Left wants to control the ideas people are exposed to through The Fairness Doctrine and the Net Neutrality Act.

If you think that's what it does you really don't know anything about Net Neutrality.
 
Of course it does. It's easier than dealing with the fact.

The "fact" is irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Do you even know what a red herring is?

Yes. The term isn't accurate just because you don't know what's going on.

How people feel about an old war from hundreds of years ago is not relevant to a completely unrelated war we're having now.

And what evidence do you have they wouldn't support it anyway? Do you have a poll or something?
 

Forum List

Back
Top