The Infidel
EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Akin's point was why is an innocent life taken for the possibility that someone said they were raped?
Akin said:
It seems to me, first of all, from what I understand from doctors, that's really rare. If it's a legitimate rape,
the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
But let's assume that maybe that didn't work or something.
You know, I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.
GOP Rep. Todd Akin Criticized For Rape Comment : NPR
So the woman who may or may not be at fault, doesn't have to pay.
The rapist May or may not be convicted and may or not pay with conviction and or sentence.
BUT the baby will pay with their life!
Does this seem quite fair?
This is a question you need to be asking those who
a) want to convey personhood to the fetus, but
b) still want to allow the killing of what they consider a person via exceptions for rape and incest.
The above is what the establishment Republicans, including Romney and Ryan, are now trying to present themselves as.
Most pro-choice people, if I am not mistaken, disagree with the fundamental argument that the fetus is a person.
If you believe a fetus is a person, then intellectual honesty as well as your own personal morality relating to that belief should compel you to accept NO exceptions,
except perhaps for 'life of the mother'.
Also, if you believe a fetus is a person, then intellectual honesty as well as your own personal morality related to that belief should compel you to call abortion MURDER and those who want it, plan it, commit it, aid in it all guilty of premeditated murder with the appropriate punishments.
Thats not on the agenda right now.... Obama's failed presidency is though.
The community organizor will be unemployed soon.