Who On This Board Can Honestly Say ...

yea, cause when i want to know what happened that is seriously questionable, i always ask the people who did it why it's ok to have done it.
who are you talking about? the Inspector General???
you have to be pretending to be this dense at times.

what is the headline for your link again? now if i were to post a headline saying "trump says why he is innocent" then you'd have to believe it cause that's the standard you're setting here.
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
 
You know why the Left can keep doing this shit ?

Because NOBODY on the Right cares enough to get off their ass and say "ENOUGH"
(or no more than a small handful out of millions)
the republicans had countless hours of investigations on it.... all on show, open hearings... for months and months...
 
the Inspector General investigated it and gave a report on it this past June 2018.... and disproves your contention.
your articles are a year before the IG's investigation...
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch describe their infamous “tarmac meeting”

Yeah, the same bunch of corrupt heathens who agreed that Obama didn't use the IRS against Conservative groups :rolleyes:

Until it was also PROVEN he did.

Just say it....you're very comfortable with corruption as long as it benefits YOU

All I want is the law applied equally to EVERYONE. What an immoral concept huh?
it was NEVER PROVEN that OBAMA did that.... in the year of investigation by republicans there was not a single shred of evidence that Obama had anything to do with it... not a nano drop! please stop with your obama bull shat made up stories...

Obama Justice Department Was Involved In IRS Targeting, Lerner Emails Reveal

if you're going to run and say BUT IT WASN'T OBAMA then great, it wasn't TRUMP it was TRUMP JR.

you can't say everything rolls uphill to the leader EXCEPT WHEN it's a leader you like.
 
the Inspector General investigated it and gave a report on it this past June 2018.... and disproves your contention.

your articles are a year before the IG's investigation...

Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch describe their infamous “tarmac meeting”
yea, cause when i want to know what happened that is seriously questionable, i always ask the people who did it why it's ok to have done it.
who are you talking about? the Inspector General???
you have to be pretending to be this dense at times.

what is the headline for your link again? now if i were to post a headline saying "trump says why he is innocent" then you'd have to believe it cause that's the standard you're setting here.
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
 
yea, cause when i want to know what happened that is seriously questionable, i always ask the people who did it why it's ok to have done it.
who are you talking about? the Inspector General???
you have to be pretending to be this dense at times.

what is the headline for your link again? now if i were to post a headline saying "trump says why he is innocent" then you'd have to believe it cause that's the standard you're setting here.
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
oh for the love of god - stop it.

bill and loretta are telling you why everything is A-OK. again, if foxnews ran an article about trump saying he's 100% innocent, you'd be wetting yourself in anger.

people, not issues. you prove it with every post you make.
 
the Inspector General investigated it and gave a report on it this past June 2018.... and disproves your contention.
your articles are a year before the IG's investigation...
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch describe their infamous “tarmac meeting”

Yeah, the same bunch of corrupt heathens who agreed that Obama didn't use the IRS against Conservative groups :rolleyes:

Until it was also PROVEN he did.

Just say it....you're very comfortable with corruption as long as it benefits YOU

All I want is the law applied equally to EVERYONE. What an immoral concept huh?
it was NEVER PROVEN that OBAMA did that.... in the year of investigation by republicans there was not a single shred of evidence that Obama had anything to do with it... not a nano drop! please stop with your obama bull shat made up stories...

Obama Justice Department Was Involved In IRS Targeting, Lerner Emails Reveal

if you're going to run and say BUT IT WASN'T OBAMA then great, it wasn't TRUMP it was TRUMP JR.

you can't say everything rolls uphill to the leader EXCEPT WHEN it's a leader you like.
the reason people believe it was not just Donald Jr is because he made a phone call, a few of them, to a blocked number, before and after the Trump tower meeting,

and Trump the father has a blocked number...

and everyone who works for Trump, says that there is no way Jose' that Trump was not aware of the Trump tower meeting, he is a hands on boss, nothing is kept from him

and Trump created a FAKE story and made up a lie about the meeting, and delivered it to the press...

it has NOTHING to do with liking or not liking a person... the circumstantial evidence, shows otherwise....

Mueller has who the blocked number went to... we have the circumstantial evidence that shows the lies
 
who are you talking about? the Inspector General???
you have to be pretending to be this dense at times.

what is the headline for your link again? now if i were to post a headline saying "trump says why he is innocent" then you'd have to believe it cause that's the standard you're setting here.
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
oh for the love of god - stop it.

bill and loretta are telling you why everything is A-OK. again, if foxnews ran an article about trump saying he's 100% innocent, you'd be wetting yourself in anger.

people, not issues. you prove it with every post you make.
read the damn report, the link is in the article, stop bull shitting, Lynch and Clinton were not the only 2 interviewed...
 
the Inspector General investigated it and gave a report on it this past June 2018.... and disproves your contention.
your articles are a year before the IG's investigation...
Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch describe their infamous “tarmac meeting”

Yeah, the same bunch of corrupt heathens who agreed that Obama didn't use the IRS against Conservative groups :rolleyes:

Until it was also PROVEN he did.

Just say it....you're very comfortable with corruption as long as it benefits YOU

All I want is the law applied equally to EVERYONE. What an immoral concept huh?
it was NEVER PROVEN that OBAMA did that.... in the year of investigation by republicans there was not a single shred of evidence that Obama had anything to do with it... not a nano drop! please stop with your obama bull shat made up stories...

Obama Justice Department Was Involved In IRS Targeting, Lerner Emails Reveal

if you're going to run and say BUT IT WASN'T OBAMA then great, it wasn't TRUMP it was TRUMP JR.

you can't say everything rolls uphill to the leader EXCEPT WHEN it's a leader you like.
the reason people believe it was not just Donald Jr is because he made a phone call, a few of them, to a blocked number, before and after the Trump tower meeting,

and Trump the father has a blocked number...

and everyone who works for Trump, says that there is no way Jose' that Trump was not aware of the Trump tower meeting, he is a hands on boss, nothing is kept from him

and Trump created a FAKE story and made up a lie about the meeting, and delivered it to the press...

it has NOTHING to do with liking or not liking a person... the circumstantial evidence, shows otherwise....

Mueller has who the blocked number went to... we have the circumstantial evidence that shows the lies
it has everything to do with whether or not you like someone.

you're nit picking trump and his activities while you bend in gumby like ways to defend hillary for far worse.
 
you have to be pretending to be this dense at times.

what is the headline for your link again? now if i were to post a headline saying "trump says why he is innocent" then you'd have to believe it cause that's the standard you're setting here.
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
oh for the love of god - stop it.

bill and loretta are telling you why everything is A-OK. again, if foxnews ran an article about trump saying he's 100% innocent, you'd be wetting yourself in anger.

people, not issues. you prove it with every post you make.
read the damn report, the link is in the article, stop bull shitting, Lynch and Clinton were not the only 2 interviewed...
i read the "damn" report.

it was very much:

Bill: oh, i heard my good friend loretta was on another plane so i went over
Loretta: it was a hot muggy day so i told him to come up into the plane and we'll talk grandkids!!!

need me to post verbatim the text from your own link?
 
t. but it is also evident to many that hillary and obama did all kinds of illegal crap too. it's what they saw and what their gut told them. i can't understand how people will forgive deleting 33k e-mails for 1 person and yet implicate someone for a "supposed" meeting that "may have" violated rules
Because she had three or more lawyers go through her emails to sort out the government emails from the private emails... Do you think she would ask them to do this if there was something nefarious going on, adding 3 people that could squeal on any wrong or illegal doings?? That's nonsensical. The gvt rules specifically states NOT to send personal emails to the National Archives, to only send gvt related emails and documents.... the 33k emails were personal.

IVANKA recently handled her emails the exact same way. She had her lawyers go through her emails, pull out the gvt emails, and send them to be archived and kept or deleted her personal ones, and did not send them to the gvt.

Have you screamed and called foul and insisted on seeing her personal emails that she did not send? NO!

can't understand how people forgive lynch / clinton meeting on a tarmac in private her hillary is under investigation OF WHICH the FBI was never allowed to call it that per hillary and no one on the left cared.
The investigation was already over when Bill met her on the tarmac... a month earlier there was a news article saying it was over and they were done and she would not be charged... they just had to tie up a couple of loose ends.... Also, if you read the IG' s report, they were not on the plane ten minutes before one of the gvt lawyers ran up there to be with them... yes it was stupid, but Clinton isn't stupid enough to do something nefarious in the open like that, in front of everyone.

Yeah, you may want to learn the difference between an email and an email server...before saying stupid stuff. You may want to learn about classified information while you're at it. As far as Clinton being stupid, sure, he limited his stupidity to only having sex, with an intern, in the oval office....dumbass.

10 minutes alone with Lynch, her husband, and a secret service guy on the plane before one of the Justice dept lawyers frantically got back on board....

you are right about his stupidity when it comes to sex and women! I don't excuse it, but having worked in the corporate world, it ain't the first time I have seen extremely smart men, CEO's in business, think through their dicks, when it comes to women and take risks that are unfathomable, yet super duper and smart, when it came to running the corporation.
After Clinton and Lynch met on a tarmac, the FBI scrambled to find and punish a source

FBI Finds 30 Pages of Clinton-Lynch Tarmac Meeting Documents – Wants Six Weeks to Turn Over Docs - Judicial Watch
the Inspector General investigated it and gave a report on it this past June 2018.... and disproves your contention.

your articles are a year before the IG's investigation...

Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch describe their infamous “tarmac meeting”

Terrific, is this also where Bill explains what "is" means?
 
...that if a professional prosecutor was given full authority to investigate every single aspect of your entire life, past and present, he would find NOTHING?




(Anyone who says they could is lying. With unlimited authority, power, time, and funds, everyone can be 'exposed')

I've held a Top Secret clearance so I'm confident that any wrongdoing a special prosecutor dug up would be pretty minor. Sure, I've gone faster than the speed limit or run a light, but there's no current evidence that could link me to those past "crimes". I'll happily turn over 30+ years of tax returns. Crooked Donnie can't even do that.


The only clearance you probably had was when you were stocking items at Walmart.

I’m not the one pretending to be an admiral. I did serve 20 years as a Coast Guard radioman/telecommunications specialist with a TS clearance. Worked three jobs in 53 years; Coast Guard (20), TSA (1), local county government (15).

Is this projection? Do you work at Walmart? Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

So your entire qualification for your job was that you were 6 feet tall, so you could walk ashore when your boat sank?

I am just pulling the puddle pilots chain!
That is correct! I'm amazed you got one right. Must make you a squid...:)
 
that's a headline, the article GIVES YOU the link to the IG's REPORT on it.
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
oh for the love of god - stop it.

bill and loretta are telling you why everything is A-OK. again, if foxnews ran an article about trump saying he's 100% innocent, you'd be wetting yourself in anger.

people, not issues. you prove it with every post you make.
read the damn report, the link is in the article, stop bull shitting, Lynch and Clinton were not the only 2 interviewed...
i read the "damn" report.

it was very much:

Bill: oh, i heard my good friend loretta was on another plane so i went over
Loretta: it was a hot muggy day so i told him to come up into the plane and we'll talk grandkids!!!

need me to post verbatim the text from your own link?
you just hate the Clintons and can't think straight! :D

Did you miss the part in my post that said the decision of not having anything to charge her with, after their year plus investigation had already been made, before Clinton ran in to Lynch.....

they just had a loose end or two to get in order and planned on making the public announcement that upcoming week...

tell us all, oh wise one.... :)

what dirty rotten thing could have been done by Bill meeting Loretta anyway? What are you IMAGINING happened to put you in such a tizzy fit?
 
I still do not like hellcat and absolutely consider the
empty plane meeting to be something improper
 
great. and all i'm saying is this is the same as asking trump why he's innocent.

stop giving me PR for a given side.
it wasn't PR, it was a part of the IG's investigation, to talk to each person there, hear their versions individually, to see if anyone was lying or there was a conspiracy to cover it up...
oh for the love of god - stop it.

bill and loretta are telling you why everything is A-OK. again, if foxnews ran an article about trump saying he's 100% innocent, you'd be wetting yourself in anger.

people, not issues. you prove it with every post you make.
read the damn report, the link is in the article, stop bull shitting, Lynch and Clinton were not the only 2 interviewed...
i read the "damn" report.

it was very much:

Bill: oh, i heard my good friend loretta was on another plane so i went over
Loretta: it was a hot muggy day so i told him to come up into the plane and we'll talk grandkids!!!

need me to post verbatim the text from your own link?
you just hate the Clintons and can't think straight! :D

Did you miss the part in my post that said the decision of not having anything to charge her with, after their year plus investigation had already been made, before Clinton ran in to Lynch.....

they just had a loose end or two to get in order and planned on making the public announcement that upcoming week...

tell us all, oh wise one.... :)

what dirty rotten thing could have been done by Bill meeting Loretta anyway? What are you IMAGINING happened to put you in such a tizzy fit?
uh huh. and your "gut feelings" are emotionally based.

clinton deleted 33k mails, paid a firm to ensure data cant be recovered, and habitually smashed her phones. you dont care.

if trump did any one of those youd throw a fit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top