Discussion in 'General Global Topics' started by actsnoblemartin, Apr 27, 2007.
Explain why here, and vote in my poll
It was tough for me to decide, but judging by the fact, the president of iran, wants to nuke a whole country and is threatening an entire region. I had to vote for him, any of the 10 bachelors on that list would make any woman happy hahaha. I mean would make an excellent choice for worlds worst dictator.
Can y'all tell me about these dictators, between anna's baby and the rest of the media's mindless news. I dont know of any real news.
somebody please vote and tell me about the dictators, cha cha cha
Kim. I would have gone for Mugabe but he loses out to Kim because he hasn't been part of a dynastic rule that has totally and utterly controlled a whole nation and kept them in servitude and ignorance. Mugabe has done a huge amount of damage to his own people but they know he's a mongrel, the North Koreans have but an inkling of the real extent of evil of Kim.
do they know he likes basketball?
Imagine a game show: who wants to flee north korea, you have to play a basketball game, and if you win, you get to go to south korea, you lose, you get to go underground, 6 feet
You should have the United States up there.
Not one individual.
The USA from the past century has killed more people "Keeping the Peace"
than any other country on the planet.
They're the only country that was found guilty by the World court and ordered to pay reparations, which they ignored.
It is a fact that if a country commits a terrorist act, they are evil and they are terrorists by US standards.
But if the united States of America does the same thing, they are fighting for peace.
By the principals of the Nuremberg trials, every single American President since then would have been hanged.
Has anyone ever been brought to trial?
Has this point even been raised?
Its not a difficult point to demonstrate.
The operational criterion for what counted as a war crime at Nuremberg was :
A criminal act that the West didnt do.
In other words, it was considered a legitimate defense if you could show that America and Britian did the same thing.
Part of the defence of the German submarine commander Admmiral Doenitz was to call an American submarine commander, Admiral Mimitz to testify, that Americans did the same thing- Thats was a defence.
Bombing of urban areas was not considered a war crime at Nuremberg; reason is, the West did it more than the Germans.
And this is all straight out.
If the West has done it, it wasnt a crime; it was only a crime if the Germans had done it and the US had not.
Ignore this, call it what you will but it is the truth, and history proves it.
It has to be Kim. If for no other reason than he has or may have or is very close to having nuclear capabilities. Yes, I know Iran is damn close as well, but they wouldn't be if not for North Korea. Kim is more than happy to sell his technology to the highest bidder, it's not like he has Kias, Hyundais, or Daewoos with which to raise money.
Along with Kim's hunger for weapons, he starves his people to fund the military, all the while preventing real news from the outside world from reaching the North Korean people.
By far Left Wing standards, this could easily be changed to suit the US of A.
Look in the dictionary under "fruitcake", and you'll find superlative's picture.
It's instructive to examine just how ridiculous leftist fanatics have to get, to keep faithfully pursuing their agenda.
Separate names with a comma.