Who is the smartest liberal?

[garyd]

No polk his policies more social welfare spending than ever before while simultaneously fighting a war Doesn't harken back to REagan but to LBJ. That didn't work out too well for LBJ either.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

compared to the other two or over all?

Run with it.

He has a stronger game than Moore, for sure. Moore is a joke. Obama's is probably stronger than Gore's, as Gore is fading.

Obama has positionsied his policies to over rule to congress by creating NGOs to direct behavior and absorb money .His kung fu is indeed strong.

 

[xsited1]

Or others

Michael Moore
BH Obama
Al Gore ?

The one who doesn't engage in unprotected gay sex. Probably Michael Moore or Al Gore since they're too fat to have sex.

 

[Liability]

Sorry but you can not use Smart and Liberal in the same sentence much less as one being an adjective for the other. Oxymoron INDEED.

The question should be which dumb ass Liberal THINKS they are the smartest.

They fucking ALL do!

 

[xsited1]

Or others

Michael Moore
BH Obama
Al Gore ?

Other than the Almighty?

He mentioned the father, son and holy ghost for liberals:

Al Gore = father, since he's the oldest and ruler of the religion of Global Warming
Barack Obama = son, the boi king
Michael Moore = holy ghost, since he's a big windbag (not to mention he'll probably die of congestive heart failure one of these days)

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Or others

Michael Moore
BH Obama
Al Gore ?

The one who doesn't engage in unprotected gay sex. Probably Michael Moore or Al Gore since they're too fat to have sex.

All the more reason to stop smoking and lose weight .

 

[xsited1]

Or others

Michael Moore
BH Obama
Al Gore ?

The one who doesn't engage in unprotected gay sex. Probably Michael Moore or Al Gore since they're too fat to have sex.

All the more reason to stop smoking and lose weight .

I think you've got that backwards. Haven't you heard of Troy McClure's Self Help Video "Smoke Yourself Thin?"

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

You don't need all of that.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMSAnZR2Q8Q[/ame]

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

I mean that in the most heterosexual way .you have to find your own thing to love and your own air.

 

[xsited1]

I mean that in the most heterosexual way .you have to find your own thing to love and your own air.

Thank GAWD! For a second there, I thought you might be turning into a liberal.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

I mean that in the most heterosexual way .you have to find your own thing to love and your own air.

Thank GAWD! For a second there, I thought you might be turning into a liberal.

No Sir .
Though I am fighting off a head cold.

 

[Dr Grump]

He is a walking taking mental illness whose world view is built of lies he has convinced himself of .All ideologies are of equal benefit to man as long as no one benefits .

And those lies would be?

 

[Polk]

Nazi Germany mimicked a lot of the 1917 Bolshevik rhetoric. Doesn't mean they were identical or even similar.

Not saying they are. Just making the point that the idea that Bush isn't really a conservative because his policies failed illustrates the same sort of lapse in logic as Marxists exhibit when they defend communism by saying that the Soviet Union wasn't really communist.

Bush wasn't really conservative because he spent all kinds of money on people who got him elected. take the iowa farmers, for example.

As did Reagan before him. If you define conservative so narrowly as to only include those who never spent money, then you're redefined the term in such a way as to make it meaningless.

 

[elvis]

Not saying they are. Just making the point that the idea that Bush isn't really a conservative because his policies failed illustrates the same sort of lapse in logic as Marxists exhibit when they defend communism by saying that the Soviet Union wasn't really communist.

Bush wasn't really conservative because he spent all kinds of money on people who got him elected. take the iowa farmers, for example.

As did Reagan before him. If you define conservative so narrowly as to only include those who never spent money, then you're defined the term in such a way as to make it meaningless.

Reagan spent money to break the Soviet Union, which, hindsight being 20/20, may not have been the best plan.
Well, actually, fiscally, Bush was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton was a conservative because the Congress stood on his head and forced him to be one. He then took all the credit in the world for balancing the budget.

 

[Polk]

He also hates the Clintons, Michael Moore, and Cindy Sheehan.

Well, hell, the guy is human. I can't ever turn the sound off on Sheehan's voice fast enough. And she herself hates Pelosi, but you wouldn't say she isn't liberal.

I dislike Sheehan also. The point is it's not accurate to access Hitchens as a liberal. That's not to say he's a conservative.When taking everything together, he's really off in his own little land (he self-describes as a "radical").

 

[Polk]

Bush wasn't really conservative because he spent all kinds of money on people who got him elected. take the iowa farmers, for example.

As did Reagan before him. If you define conservative so narrowly as to only include those who never spent money, then you're defined the term in such a way as to make it meaningless.

Reagan spent money to break the Soviet Union, which, hindsight being 20/20, may not have been the best plan.
Well, actually, fiscally, Bush was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton was a conservative because the Congress stood on his head and forced him to be one. He then took all the credit in the world for balancing the budget.

It's the difference between rhetoric and practice. Conservatives claim to care about the deficit, but spend like drunken sailors when in power, while others actually address the problem head-on (the decline in the deficit in the late 90s comes from the tax increases passed in early part of the decade, first under the moderate George H.W. Bush and then under Clinton).

 

[Polk]

No polk his policies more social welfare spending than ever before while simultaneously fighting a war Doesn't harken back to REagan but to LBJ. That didn't work out too well for LBJ either.

No True Scotsman - RationalWiki

 

[elvis]

As did Reagan before him. If you define conservative so narrowly as to only include those who never spent money, then you're defined the term in such a way as to make it meaningless.

Reagan spent money to break the Soviet Union, which, hindsight being 20/20, may not have been the best plan.
Well, actually, fiscally, Bush was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton was a conservative because the Congress stood on his head and forced him to be one. He then took all the credit in the world for balancing the budget.

It's the difference between rhetoric and practice. Conservatives claim to care about the deficit, but spend like drunken sailors when in power, while others actually address the problem head-on (the decline in the deficit in the late 90s comes from the tax increases passed in early part of the decade, first under the moderate George H.W. Bush and then under Clinton).

You're forgetting about the biggest cuts in social programs since the New Deal, which clinton was responsible for. That also contributed to the balanced budget/surplus.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Yeah dont forget the peace dividend

 

[Polk]

Reagan spent money to break the Soviet Union, which, hindsight being 20/20, may not have been the best plan.
Well, actually, fiscally, Bush was more liberal than Clinton. Clinton was a conservative because the Congress stood on his head and forced him to be one. He then took all the credit in the world for balancing the budget.

It's the difference between rhetoric and practice. Conservatives claim to care about the deficit, but spend like drunken sailors when in power, while others actually address the problem head-on (the decline in the deficit in the late 90s comes from the tax increases passed in early part of the decade, first under the moderate George H.W. Bush and then under Clinton).

You're forgetting about the biggest cuts in social programs since the New Deal, which clinton was responsible for. That also contributed to the balanced budget/surplus.

Contributed, sure, but most of the narrowing comes from increased revenue. While the strong economy was a part of that, both the 1990 and 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliations added a large amount of revenue (the 1990 bill added 2.7 percent over the baseline, while the 1993 bill added an additional 3.5 percent).