Cherry Nose found another way of saying —— Surrender America’s sovereignty to the United Nations.
People who claim to want the nation-state are actually trying to have a pan-national movement to institutionalize separatism and division within borders all over the world. It’s like we’re all having an identity crisis at once — and it is an inevitable consequence of the economic and social changes that have occurred at an increasingly rapid pace.
Bill Clinton warns that nationalism is ‘taking us to the edge of our destruction’
Carlos Garcia Mar 10, 2017 7:46 pm
Bill Clinton warns that nationalism is ‘taking us to the edge of our destruction’
Carlos Garcia Mar 10, 2017 7:46 pm
Bill Clinton warns that nationalism is ‘taking us to the edge of our destruction’
It never occurs to Bubba & Company that mankind still rejects a one government world after thousands of years countless empires, cultures, conquerors, wars, priesthoods, and governments faded away:
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”—Strobe Talbot, Bill Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, Time, July 20th, 1992.
Bill Clinton’s established the President’s Council on Sustainable Development by executive order in 1993 to implement U.N. Agenda 21 despite opposition from Congress. In 2009 Barack Obama created the “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance” to do likewise. Hillary Clinton’s husband and boss both have taken strong stands to implement world economic integration via the U.N.
George H.W. Bush supported the accord. His son signed Executive Order 13423 on January 24, 2007 . . .
XXXXX
Bill Clinton’s established the President’s Council on Sustainable Development by executive order in 1993 to implement U.N. Agenda 21 despite opposition from Congress. In 2009 Barack Obama created the “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance” to do likewise. Hillary Clinton’s husband and boss both have taken strong stands to implement world economic integration via the U.N.
George H.W. Bush supported the accord. His son signed Executive Order 13423 on January 24, 2007 . . .
XXXXX
Ending National Sovereignty One Industry at a Time
By Timothy Birdnow
August 19, 2016
Ending National Sovereignty One Industry at a Time
By Timothy Birdnow
August 19, 2016
Ending National Sovereignty One Industry at a Time
The Coal Fraud
Question: When was the public ever aware of the Clinton international agenda during their eight years in the White House? Answer: The public was never told that this country’s submission to global government was a priority in the Clinton Administration, nor did Hillary Clinton ever campaign on it. It was never talked about, nor debated or challenged on television. There is not one network, or independent station, in favor of defending America’s sovereignty. There is not one decision-maker in television’s hierarchy who would jeopardize their career for a principle let alone risk their tax dollar incomes making an issue of the UNIC (United Nations/International Community).
Parenthetically, philosophers, great thinkers, and ordinary men throughout history have all seen government as a great evil that must be held in check. Because of today’s overpowering propaganda apparatus the public is being brainwashed into believing that totalitarian government administered by Socialist moralists can be beneficial to mankind in spite of all of the evidence to the contrary. (Do moralists always go into government? Or does a seat at the public trough turn parasites into moralists?)
For thousands of years philosophers, political thinkers, and ordinary people alike believed that the least government is the best government. This country’s Founders finally gave the world freedom from tyrannical government. Now, with the help of modern propaganda tools ——TELEVISION —— Socialists would have everyone believe that a totalitarian global government will suddenly benefit mankind. A quick look at the evils practiced by totalitarian governments in the twentieth century, made possible by electronic propaganda tools, tells us otherwise.
Debate beneficial government until doomsday, but one truth stands out. The only government worth its salt is a representative form of government dedicated to keeping its powers over law-abiding citizens to an absolute minimum.
The Right to be let alone is not a Right dirty little moralists can live with
First, the Right to be let alone does not mean the Right to go live in a cave and live like a hermit. Nobody needs the government’s permission to live that lifestyle.
Secondly, I do not believe that free people want to be led. Many may not be strong enough to standup for themselves for one reason or another, but decent-people have been fighting for their individual Rights for countless centuries. The Right to be let alone is the American way of saying it.
Clarification: My use of decent-people as a compound word should not be taken as a moral judgement. It is simply my way of identifying individuals who do not want to control anyone’s life and resources except their own.
When the Socialists first got their foot in the political door back during the Great Depression they immediately began eroding the individual’s Right to be let alone. That Right is the most important Right of all. The Right to make choices in our personal lives springs from the Right to be let alone. The government may prohibit, but it should never entitle under the guise of prohibition. Entitle is why Democrats have been attacking our Right to be let alone from the day they first pulled up a chair at the public trough.
The right to be let alone is indeed the beginning of all freedoms. William O. Douglas
I prefer Eric Hoffer’s (1902–1983) way of saying the Right to be let alone. He pinpoints the one thing that totalitarian governments will never allow:
“The basic test of freedom is perhaps less in what we are free to do than in what we are free not to do. It is the freedom to refrain, withdraw and abstain which makes a totalitarian regime impossible.” The Passionate State of Mind (1955).
Note that the Socialist priesthood thrives on denying Americans the Right to abstain. Socialists tell Americans what they must do rather than what they must not do. They accomplish it through tax dollar tithing; reinforced by judicial mandates and executive orders rather than legislation. Americans would never stand for it if a Supreme Deity religion pulled the same thing.
America’s move toward Socialism’s brand of totalitarian government must be reversed if this country is not to follow so many others into oblivion. Let the other countries do as they will if collectivism is what their people want, but Americans should return to the path our Founders put us on when they gave us limited representative government. It was not a promise of paradise, but it is the best form government to ever come along.
There has never been any doubt in my mind that leading Democrats are determined to abolish America’s sovereignty. Propaganda praising global markets, and open-borders, is a very clever step on the road to Americans surrendering to international institutions. Does that not worry you? It should. I am not exaggerating humankind’s eternal struggle to establish limited representative government. Freedom’s struggle is the fear that all totalitarians must defeat. Global government was formulated to abolish freedom for all time.
NOTE: Even hardcore Communists used to say that government would fade away and disappear completely in a perfect Communist state. The old Commies were smart enough to make a promise they knew they would never have to keep. Today’s democracy advocates, like Clinton and Obama, make no pretense of doing away with government altogether by falsely claiming democracy will evolve into limited government.
Responsibilities
The United Nations crowd mastered the fine art of fabricating global responsibilities, and then taxing Americans to pay for it. Go outside of government and academe and you would be hard put finding even a small percentage of Americans who willingly accept “global responsibilities” never mind place them before their own best interests. Example: One global responsibility in foreign policy lexicon means open-borders.
Finally, going all the way back to ancient Greece, the Roman Empire, China, India, etc., the wisdom of their philosophers, thinkers, writers, and astute observers is taught, quoted, written about, and universally respected. So how come every Democrat treats America’s Founding Fathers like they were idiots?
Founding Fathers were all wealthy men who risked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to make this country.There is not one piece of garbage in Clinton’s philosophy that defends this country, its Constitution, or its sovereignty. Indeed, Clinton and his kind will never risk their lives, or their tax dollar fortunes. Notice that I did not include sacred honor since they have none to risk.