Who believes there are weapons of dest. in Iraq?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by winston churchi, Mar 6, 2004.

  1. winston churchi
    Offline

    winston churchi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Messages:
    640
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +9
    I will admit I believe there weapons of mass dest. in Iraq. I am waiting for the day - soon I hope - when they will be discovered.
     
  2. OCA
    Offline

    OCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,014
    Thanks Received:
    223
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Washington D.C.
    Ratings:
    +223
    I believe that there are probably still remnants of WMD in Iraq but that Sadaam destroyed probably most of em before we went in so he could thumb his nose one last time at U.S. Makes sense if you think about it because no gas was used in the war.
     
  3. jon_forward
    Offline

    jon_forward Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,436
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    nashville.tn
    Ratings:
    +5
    my bro was over there for over a year....the militarys belief is that they were moved to Syria.....
     
  4. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.
     
  5. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,548
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,163
    Im pretty sure there were WMD. Whether they are there still now is another story. I mean we did give Saddam over a year to hide and or ship them out. (Thank you so much liberals who seem to think waiting 12 years to take out a tyrant is acting fast).

    With that regard i think Democrats are morons on this issue. They are totally using the WMD destruction issue the wrong way. If i were them instead of pretending the WMD never existed and that Bush lied (along with Clinton, the UN, Iraq and half the nations of the world). I would be arguing that Bush administration dropped the ball in losing the WMD and that while they did a good job with taking Saddam out, I could do a better job. Id be using the real JFK's approach.

    But they wont. its a matter of pride.
     
  6. Zhukov
    Offline

    Zhukov VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,492
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Everywhere, simultaneously.
    Ratings:
    +301
    Eight years from now, somewhere in the Northwestern part of the country, some Iraqi kid is going to die while playing around barrels unearthed by a sandstorm .
     
  7. jon_forward
    Offline

    jon_forward Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,436
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    nashville.tn
    Ratings:
    +5
    and G.W will get blamed for that too...:(
     
  8. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,548
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,163
    "and G.W will get blamed for that too..."

    Of course he will. It wil have been President Bush's fault for forcing Saddam to hide the WMD instead of using them against Americans like he should have.
     
  9. lilcountriegal
    Offline

    lilcountriegal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    1,633
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +59
    I completely believe there are WMD in Iraq. I think he did have stockpiles of them, however, most likely moved them to Syria and Saudi.

    I dont think he would be stupid enough to move them all... that would leave him too vulnerable to other nations like Iran. I think he moved the majority of them, but has the rest of them hidden away somewhere. Iraq is fairly large when in comparison to barrels of substance.

    I believe whoever on this board used the example of hiding a gallon barrel somewhere in California and trying to find it in an allotted time hit the nail directly on the head.
     
  10. Barbarossa
    Online

    Barbarossa Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    There most likely were weapons of massed destruction in Iraq. But were all moved out before the U.S. could locate them.
     

Share This Page