Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
200 years ago we were predominately a rural society. People needed guns for protection and a means of putting food on the table. Today most people live within feet of their neighbors not miles. If they see a prowler, they call the police. They get their food from a grocery store, not by hunting.200 years ago America was a much different place. 200 years from now, a limited array of weapons will be available to Citizens who're willing to submit to a fairly invasive household background check.
You can be part of the discussion that makes that happen, or you can dig in your two right heels and be buried by history. Your choice.
200 years ago we were predominately a rural society. People needed guns for protection and a means of putting food on the table. Today most people live within feet of their neighbors not miles. If they see a prowler, they call the police. They get their food from a grocery store, not by hunting.200 years ago America was a much different place. 200 years from now, a limited array of weapons will be available to Citizens who're willing to submit to a fairly invasive household background check.
You can be part of the discussion that makes that happen, or you can dig in your two right heels and be buried by history. Your choice.
With increased population, urbanization, and media coverage of violence the demand for gun control will only grow.
Is this where you expect conservatives to say, "Oh, if MITT does it, then it's okay!!"?Governor Mitt Romney has signed into law a permanent assault weapons ban that he says will make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns.
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts," Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony on July 1 with legislators, sportsmen's groups and gun safety advocates. "These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."
Like the federal assault weapons ban, the state ban, put in place in 1998, was scheduled to expire in September. The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.
Romney signs off on permanent assault weapons ban / iBerkshires.com - The Berkshires online guide to events, news and Berkshire County community information.
Not going to happen.
I think it is very rude and offensive for Democratic liberal gun grabbers to tell all Americans what kind of Guns we can buy. Or that we don't need high capacity ammo clips?! or Assault weapons. I should be able to deceide this issue on my own.
Don't we as Ameircans have a 2nd amendment right to choose what ever weapon system
we want. Or if we want a high capacity clip or not.!?
I don't appreciate Barack Obama , or Gov. Andrew Cuomo telling me what guns I can or can not have.!
I think it is very rude and offensive for Democrautic liberal gun grabbers to tell all Americans what kind of Guns we can buy. Or that we don't need high capacity ammo clips?! or Assault weapons. I should be able to deceide this issue on my own.
Don't we as Ameircans have a 2nd amendment right to choose what ever weapon system
we want. Or if we want a high capacity clip or not.!?
I don't appreciate Barack Obama , or Gov. Andrew Cuomo telling me what guns I can or can not have.!
How about this for a compromise:
Whatever firearms were available at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment, are 100% unrestricted and you can have as many as you want.
you should be able to buy a tank dammit. Criminals can get them, you should as well. Oh and don't get is started on Nukes. You Gould be able to have those as well.200 years ago we were predominately a rural society. People needed guns for protection and a means of putting food on the table. Today most people live within feet of their neighbors not miles. If they see a prowler, they call the police. They get their food from a grocery store, not by hunting.200 years ago America was a much different place. 200 years from now, a limited array of weapons will be available to Citizens who're willing to submit to a fairly invasive household background check.
You can be part of the discussion that makes that happen, or you can dig in your two right heels and be buried by history. Your choice.
With increased population, urbanization, and media coverage of violence the demand for gun control will only grow.
So only criminals and terrorists will have guns, and high capacity clips. You want us to
be like defensless sheep. Oh , we are all living in the modern world and don't need guns?
Please sir keep your opinions to your self. Its people that think like you why people get victimized
by criminals.
How about this for a compromise:
Whatever firearms were available at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment, are 100% unrestricted and you can have as many as you want.
I can has cannon?
What I don't understand is that with all these bans being placed on American citizens, meanwhile
the terrorists, and other rebel groups in and outside America are all armed with fully automatic
AK 47 assault rifles. And they are all laughing at us, realizing that these coward Americans won't be able to defend themselves against them and their fully automatic AK 47 assault rifles.
Is this where you expect conservatives to say, "Oh, if MITT does it, then it's okay!!"?Governor Mitt Romney has signed into law a permanent assault weapons ban that he says will make it harder for criminals to get their hands on these guns.
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts," Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony on July 1 with legislators, sportsmen's groups and gun safety advocates. "These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."
Like the federal assault weapons ban, the state ban, put in place in 1998, was scheduled to expire in September. The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.
Romney signs off on permanent assault weapons ban / iBerkshires.com - The Berkshires online guide to events, news and Berkshire County community information.
Not going to happen.
How about this for a compromise:
Whatever firearms were available at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment, are 100% unrestricted and you can have as many as you want.
I can has cannon?
As many as you want.
Abuse the guns you have....lose your privileges
Why should assassins be allowed the weapons of their choice?
Abuse the opinions you have...lose your privileges.
Why should thoughtcriminals be allowed the weapons of their choice?
Why does it make us look foolish and hypocritical?Is this where you expect conservatives to say, "Oh, if MITT does it, then it's okay!!"?
Not going to happen.
No, I expect 99% of you to completely ignore it because it makes you look foolish and hugely hypocritical given that you've gone nuclear the last month over gun control.
Okay. Then you also support slavery and women not being able to vote.How about this for a compromise:
Whatever firearms were available at the time of the writing of the 2nd Amendment, are 100% unrestricted and you can have as many as you want.
I don't think you understand that the Bill of Rights places limits on the Federal government.I think it is very rude and offensive for Democratic liberal gun grabbers to tell all Americans what kind of Guns we can buy. Or that we don't need high capacity ammo clips?! or Assault weapons. I should be able to deceide this issue on my own.
Don't we as Ameircans have a 2nd amendment right to choose what ever weapon system
we want. Or if we want a high capacity clip or not.!?
I don't appreciate Barack Obama , or Gov. Andrew Cuomo telling me what guns I can or can not have.!
At least youre consistent in your idiocy.
The rights enshrined in the Second Amendment, as is the case with all other rights, are not absolute; certain restrictions are appropriate.
How does it prove that? Mitt is just one guy, you know. Not a majority of conservatives.Is this where you expect conservatives to say, "Oh, if MITT does it, then it's okay!!"?
Not going to happen.
Actually, it goes to the fact that those on the right who oppose any restrictions at all, and perceive the right to take up arms against a Federal government theyve subjectively and capriciously determined to be tyrannical constitute a tiny minority among conservatives.
Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.Abuse the guns you have....lose your privileges
Why should assassins be allowed the weapons of their choice?
Abuse the opinions you have...lose your privileges.
Why should thoughtcriminals be allowed the weapons of their choice?
Simple solution.......let me decide who gets to have a gun
Let me talk to you for five minutes and I can tell whether you are the type of person who should be armed
Heads up
Many on this board would not pass the test
