- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,139
- 140,528
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #41
The bottom line when all is said and done is that no matter what the reason or situation, the country can not have nearly half it's population being supported by the rest. It's unsustainable. All day long, back and forth, who comprises it, who needs it, who doesn't deserve it, who pays taxes, who doesn't....
The whole point being missed is as plain as the nose of one's face. It can't continue.
This is part of the Conservative argument that I don't understand
How are you supporting those 47%? They are earning money, they are supporting their own families, they are paying state and local taxes
However, by taking dependent child, mortgage, charity and medical deductions they get their federal rate down to zero
How exactly, are you supporting them?
Even if they get no check from government and contribute nothing to it, they are getting free roads, military, courts, ... No one should pay no taxes. It's the ultimate in pitting one group of citizens against another, those with a stake in paying for our government and those who at best contribute nothing to it.
That is what I wanted to hear
Why is it that when we ask billionaires to pay a greater burden for roads, military and courts....Conservatives go nutz
Yet they have no reservations in asking families that are struggling to provide food, shelter and healthcare to kick in more