Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Normally, "crackers" and "honkies" are associated with unambiguous racism. When I was a child, such white people routinely used the word "******" when speaking about blacks. Such narrow appeals to white supremacy are no longer tolerated in most parts of the country; however, that doesn't mean the pathology no longer exists:
"
Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
And had Cold War implications. Which is why the Left supported it, because they were/are marxist traitors.
President Reagan was laser focused on the idea that Communism would be defeated. Communism was always a worse system than apartheid in South Africa and he wasn't going to be distracted. Further, Communism seeks worldwide conquest and domination. Apartheid, for as negative as it was, never sought to export its system around the globe.
Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."
I am no "white supremacist" by any meaning of the word.
However, I do recognize that Honkies and Crackers have done a lot for this nation, and the demonization of this population does nothing for our country at all. Honkies have been responsible for a lot of progress in this country.Normally, "crackers" and "honkies" are associated with unambiguous racism. ....."However, I do recognize that Honkies and Crackers have done a lot for this nation, and the demonization of this population does nothing for our country at all. Honkies have been responsible for a lot of progress in this country.
Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
And had Cold War implications. Which is why the Left supported it, because they were/are marxist traitors.
President Reagan was laser focused on the idea that Communism would be defeated. Communism was always a worse system than apartheid in South Africa and he wasn't going to be distracted. Further, Communism seeks worldwide conquest and domination. Apartheid, for as negative as it was, never sought to export its system around the globe.
Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
Examples of American apartheid included four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow laws, and sustained genocide against indigenous Americans. I'm perplexed beyond belief you could deny those examples of systematic white supremacy?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.Examples of American apartheid included four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow laws, and sustained genocide against indigenous Americans. I'm perplexed beyond belief you could deny those examples of systematic white supremacy?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
You don't need much.Yes, you need media, like alternate universe prince Tucker Carlson, who is pushing this lie.I'm just saying that you're entitled to your opinion, and there's no reason for me to try to change it.Thanks for dismissing me.
I'll just keep reading threads like this one and be comfortable in my opinion: White Supremacy Is A Hoax. It's A Lie. It's Not A Big Problem
.
A thread on a discussion forum is not the type of mechanism you need to pull off a Big LIe.
YOu need Big Media, TV, Radio, Pop Culture, repeating the same lie over and over.
YES, online threads would be part of such a "Big Lie", but they would never be the first example you would go for.
And all the Trumpsters follow along dutifully, repeating his words on this little ol' message board.
.
Tucker Carlson, could be the big face of a BIg Lie, but, you would still need more. Fox by itself? Even that would not be enough.
Really, you want an example of a Big Lie, look at the "Very fine people" lie, THAT'S a Big Lie.
Repeated constantly massively across all forms of media, over and over again, until it becomes believed.
Tucker Carlson is a leaf in the wind, compared to that kind of power.
Let me ask you something. IF, we adopted a national consensus that we don't consider someone a white supremacist unless he "self identify" as one,
how would it matter?
Once Carlson or Hannity or Rush or Levin inject something into the alternate universe, it becomes gospel and part of the current within the closed circuit. Then we see it echoed everywhere, including here. And we'll often see Trump run with it, because he's the key to the alternate universe. That's it. That's enough. That's all you need. It becomes the blood in your veins.
The term "white supremacist" could be removed from our lexicon tomorrow, and it wouldn't matter, because real anti-black and anti-Hispanic racism still exists. And that's my point. It's being used in a weird attempt to minimize and marginalize the much bigger picture, and no one is buying it. Playing that dishonest rhetorical game is only making things worse.
.
...far less watch the bobbleheads on CNN.
Happy now!So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
And had Cold War implications. Which is why the Left supported it, because they were/are marxist traitors.
President Reagan was laser focused on the idea that Communism would be defeated. Communism was always a worse system than apartheid in South Africa and he wasn't going to be distracted. Further, Communism seeks worldwide conquest and domination. Apartheid, for as negative as it was, never sought to export its system around the globe.
How negative, really, was Apartheid -
At that point in History, South Africa was the only country on the continent where Black Africans ate on a regular basis.
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
What makes you think the profit motive Trumps human rights?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.What makes you think the profit motive Trumps human rights?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
"The Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986[1] was a law enacted by the United States Congress.
"The law imposed sanctions against South Africa and stated five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would essentially end the system of apartheid, which the latter was under at the time.
"Most of the sanctions were repealed in July 1991 after South Africa took steps towards meeting the preconditions of the act, with the final vestiges of the act being repealed in November 1993."
Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act - Wikipedia
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.What makes you think the profit motive Trumps human rights?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.
"The Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986[1] was a law enacted by the United States Congress.
"The law imposed sanctions against South Africa and stated five preconditions for lifting the sanctions that would essentially end the system of apartheid, which the latter was under at the time.
"Most of the sanctions were repealed in July 1991 after South Africa took steps towards meeting the preconditions of the act, with the final vestiges of the act being repealed in November 1993."
Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act - Wikipedia
Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."
They left just oooze with hate whitey ...and theyre like spoon fed robots regurgitating everything thats fed to them WITHOUT one original thought in their empty low iq left wing heads
Ammo up whitey ...theyre fuckin batshit insane and cant see where this is leading
How much ammo will whitey need to prevent this?Ammo up whitey ...theyre fuckin batshit insane and cant see where this is leading
Does a rapidly browning body politic in the US cause you to break out in a cold sweat?
You're not alone.
Among Trump's 60 million voters, it is entirely possible a cold-blooded analysis would reveal the base is to the right of its leaders?
White Supremacy Has Never Been Fringe
"Consider the most recent annual large-scale survey of American public opinion by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan research group in Washington, D.C.
"Respondents were asked how they felt about the country's rapidly changing demographics.
"While a majority of those surveyed said they thought that the United States becoming a majority non-white country by 2045 would be mostly positive, nearly 60% of Republicans felt that it would be mostly negative.
"Six in 10 Republicans also said that they felt like strangers in their own country, while a majority of white respondents (and nearly 80% of Republicans) said there should be stricter limits placed on legal immigration to the U.S.
"Almost six in 10 white evangelical Protestant said immigrants threatened American society.
"Just as it did at the end of the 19th century, the idea that a rapidly browning populace poses a danger to the Republic continues to enjoy wide purchase."
They left just oooze with hate whitey ...and theyre like spoon fed robots regurgitating everything thats fed to them WITHOUT one original thought in their empty low iq left wing heads
Ammo up whitey ...theyre fuckin batshit insane and cant see where this is leadingHow much ammo will whitey need to prevent this?Ammo up whitey ...theyre fuckin batshit insane and cant see where this is leading
It's not 1998 anymore. Democrats shouldn't be afraid of impeachment (Opinion) - CNN
Yes, thanks for self-identifying like that. Your post is perfect.You don't need much.Yes, you need media, like alternate universe prince Tucker Carlson, who is pushing this lie.I'm just saying that you're entitled to your opinion, and there's no reason for me to try to change it.
I'll just keep reading threads like this one and be comfortable in my opinion: White Supremacy Is A Hoax. It's A Lie. It's Not A Big Problem
.
A thread on a discussion forum is not the type of mechanism you need to pull off a Big LIe.
YOu need Big Media, TV, Radio, Pop Culture, repeating the same lie over and over.
YES, online threads would be part of such a "Big Lie", but they would never be the first example you would go for.
And all the Trumpsters follow along dutifully, repeating his words on this little ol' message board.
.
Tucker Carlson, could be the big face of a BIg Lie, but, you would still need more. Fox by itself? Even that would not be enough.
Really, you want an example of a Big Lie, look at the "Very fine people" lie, THAT'S a Big Lie.
Repeated constantly massively across all forms of media, over and over again, until it becomes believed.
Tucker Carlson is a leaf in the wind, compared to that kind of power.
Let me ask you something. IF, we adopted a national consensus that we don't consider someone a white supremacist unless he "self identify" as one,
how would it matter?
Once Carlson or Hannity or Rush or Levin inject something into the alternate universe, it becomes gospel and part of the current within the closed circuit. Then we see it echoed everywhere, including here. And we'll often see Trump run with it, because he's the key to the alternate universe. That's it. That's enough. That's all you need. It becomes the blood in your veins.
The term "white supremacist" could be removed from our lexicon tomorrow, and it wouldn't matter, because real anti-black and anti-Hispanic racism still exists. And that's my point. It's being used in a weird attempt to minimize and marginalize the much bigger picture, and no one is buying it. Playing that dishonest rhetorical game is only making things worse.
.
LOL...….analysis fAiL.
A huge % of Americans have no clue who Mark Levin is. Only matrix bubbleheads think otherwise. WTF?! You think this message board is a reflection of America on politics?
Nobody thinks there is a white supremacy problem except hyper-left guys with a politics ocd issue. Americans think there is a sliver of the population who are white supremacists...…..and of course they'd be right. Nobody watches the Sean Hannity Show you asshat…
What moves folks in the voting booth is seeing Ferguson and Charlotte in 2015.....the Baltimore riots...…...that freaks people out. A total collapse of civility. You wanna call that racism? God bless. Only matters what the public thinks s0n......you might change the minds of about 13 people on this board!!
Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.Perhaps Trump's four years in DC has opened a few eyes to just how enduring white supremacy is among a large percentage of Americans?Republicans are a nearly all white party. That kind of clued us in. I just don’t understand why they pretend to be angry at being called racist? I’m guessing they’re proud of it in private.
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
"Racial segregation
- "Racism in the United States has existed since the colonial era, when white Americans were given legally or socially sanctioned privileges and rights while these same rights were denied to other races and minorities.
- "European Americans — particularly affluent white Anglo-Saxon Protestants — enjoyed exclusive privileges in matters of education, immigration, voting rights, citizenship, land acquisition, and criminal procedure throughout American history."
So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
That makes sense. NOt.
Dude.
What are you most proud of, Twinkie, four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow, and genocide in the US or Reagan's veto of the Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986?So to support your stupid claim that white supremacy is "enduring" in America, you post a sign from apartheid era South Africa?
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
"In the view of the United Nations and the U.S. Human Rights Network, "discrimination in the United States permeates all aspects of life and extends to all communities of color."[3]
"While the nature of the views held by average Americans has changed significantly over the past several decades, surveys by organizations such as ABC News have found that even in modern America, large sections of Americans admit to holding discriminatory viewpoints.
"For example, a 2007 article by ABC stated that about one in ten admitted to holding prejudices against Hispanic and Latino Americans and about one in four did so regarding Arab-Americans.[4]
"A 2018 YouGov/Economist poll found that 17% of Americans oppose interracial marriage, with 19% of members of 'other' ethnic groups, 18% of blacks, 17% of whites, and 15% of Hispanics opposing it.[5]
Racism in the United States - Wikipedia
The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
The law was a restriction on free trade.Examples of American apartheid included four centuries of chattel slavery, Jim Crow laws, and sustained genocide against indigenous Americans. I'm perplexed beyond belief you could deny those examples of systematic white supremacy?The "Anti-apartheid Act" had nothing to do with apartheid, but with foreign relations. America never had apartheid.
Yes, thanks for self-identifying like that. Your post is perfect.You don't need much.Yes, you need media, like alternate universe prince Tucker Carlson, who is pushing this lie.A thread on a discussion forum is not the type of mechanism you need to pull off a Big LIe.
YOu need Big Media, TV, Radio, Pop Culture, repeating the same lie over and over.
YES, online threads would be part of such a "Big Lie", but they would never be the first example you would go for.
And all the Trumpsters follow along dutifully, repeating his words on this little ol' message board.
.
Tucker Carlson, could be the big face of a BIg Lie, but, you would still need more. Fox by itself? Even that would not be enough.
Really, you want an example of a Big Lie, look at the "Very fine people" lie, THAT'S a Big Lie.
Repeated constantly massively across all forms of media, over and over again, until it becomes believed.
Tucker Carlson is a leaf in the wind, compared to that kind of power.
Let me ask you something. IF, we adopted a national consensus that we don't consider someone a white supremacist unless he "self identify" as one,
how would it matter?
Once Carlson or Hannity or Rush or Levin inject something into the alternate universe, it becomes gospel and part of the current within the closed circuit. Then we see it echoed everywhere, including here. And we'll often see Trump run with it, because he's the key to the alternate universe. That's it. That's enough. That's all you need. It becomes the blood in your veins.
The term "white supremacist" could be removed from our lexicon tomorrow, and it wouldn't matter, because real anti-black and anti-Hispanic racism still exists. And that's my point. It's being used in a weird attempt to minimize and marginalize the much bigger picture, and no one is buying it. Playing that dishonest rhetorical game is only making things worse.
.
LOL...….analysis fAiL.
A huge % of Americans have no clue who Mark Levin is. Only matrix bubbleheads think otherwise. WTF?! You think this message board is a reflection of America on politics?
Nobody thinks there is a white supremacy problem except hyper-left guys with a politics ocd issue. Americans think there is a sliver of the population who are white supremacists...…..and of course they'd be right. Nobody watches the Sean Hannity Show you asshat…
What moves folks in the voting booth is seeing Ferguson and Charlotte in 2015.....the Baltimore riots...…...that freaks people out. A total collapse of civility. You wanna call that racism? God bless. Only matters what the public thinks s0n......you might change the minds of about 13 people on this board!!
.
An obedient Trumpster, willing to dismiss the topic with platitudes, denial and name-calling.Yes, thanks for self-identifying like that. Your post is perfect.You don't need much.Yes, you need media, like alternate universe prince Tucker Carlson, who is pushing this lie.
And all the Trumpsters follow along dutifully, repeating his words on this little ol' message board.
.
Tucker Carlson, could be the big face of a BIg Lie, but, you would still need more. Fox by itself? Even that would not be enough.
Really, you want an example of a Big Lie, look at the "Very fine people" lie, THAT'S a Big Lie.
Repeated constantly massively across all forms of media, over and over again, until it becomes believed.
Tucker Carlson is a leaf in the wind, compared to that kind of power.
Let me ask you something. IF, we adopted a national consensus that we don't consider someone a white supremacist unless he "self identify" as one,
how would it matter?
Once Carlson or Hannity or Rush or Levin inject something into the alternate universe, it becomes gospel and part of the current within the closed circuit. Then we see it echoed everywhere, including here. And we'll often see Trump run with it, because he's the key to the alternate universe. That's it. That's enough. That's all you need. It becomes the blood in your veins.
The term "white supremacist" could be removed from our lexicon tomorrow, and it wouldn't matter, because real anti-black and anti-Hispanic racism still exists. And that's my point. It's being used in a weird attempt to minimize and marginalize the much bigger picture, and no one is buying it. Playing that dishonest rhetorical game is only making things worse.
.
LOL...….analysis fAiL.
A huge % of Americans have no clue who Mark Levin is. Only matrix bubbleheads think otherwise. WTF?! You think this message board is a reflection of America on politics?
Nobody thinks there is a white supremacy problem except hyper-left guys with a politics ocd issue. Americans think there is a sliver of the population who are white supremacists...…..and of course they'd be right. Nobody watches the Sean Hannity Show you asshat…
What moves folks in the voting booth is seeing Ferguson and Charlotte in 2015.....the Baltimore riots...…...that freaks people out. A total collapse of civility. You wanna call that racism? God bless. Only matters what the public thinks s0n......you might change the minds of about 13 people on this board!!
.
What did he self identify as?
An obedient Trumpster, willing to dismiss the topic with platitudes, denial and name-calling.Yes, thanks for self-identifying like that. Your post is perfect.You don't need much.Tucker Carlson, could be the big face of a BIg Lie, but, you would still need more. Fox by itself? Even that would not be enough.
Really, you want an example of a Big Lie, look at the "Very fine people" lie, THAT'S a Big Lie.
Repeated constantly massively across all forms of media, over and over again, until it becomes believed.
Tucker Carlson is a leaf in the wind, compared to that kind of power.
Let me ask you something. IF, we adopted a national consensus that we don't consider someone a white supremacist unless he "self identify" as one,
how would it matter?
Once Carlson or Hannity or Rush or Levin inject something into the alternate universe, it becomes gospel and part of the current within the closed circuit. Then we see it echoed everywhere, including here. And we'll often see Trump run with it, because he's the key to the alternate universe. That's it. That's enough. That's all you need. It becomes the blood in your veins.
The term "white supremacist" could be removed from our lexicon tomorrow, and it wouldn't matter, because real anti-black and anti-Hispanic racism still exists. And that's my point. It's being used in a weird attempt to minimize and marginalize the much bigger picture, and no one is buying it. Playing that dishonest rhetorical game is only making things worse.
.
LOL...….analysis fAiL.
A huge % of Americans have no clue who Mark Levin is. Only matrix bubbleheads think otherwise. WTF?! You think this message board is a reflection of America on politics?
Nobody thinks there is a white supremacy problem except hyper-left guys with a politics ocd issue. Americans think there is a sliver of the population who are white supremacists...…..and of course they'd be right. Nobody watches the Sean Hannity Show you asshat…
What moves folks in the voting booth is seeing Ferguson and Charlotte in 2015.....the Baltimore riots...…...that freaks people out. A total collapse of civility. You wanna call that racism? God bless. Only matters what the public thinks s0n......you might change the minds of about 13 people on this board!!
.
What did he self identify as?
.
