Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Unfortunately you aren't discussing the topic.....If he really did say he wants to "take a weed whacker to net neutrality," then it's unfortunate that the new FCC head doesn't know how the internet works.
Tell us what net neutrality isUnfortunately you aren't discussing the topic.....If he really did say he wants to "take a weed whacker to net neutrality," then it's unfortunate that the new FCC head doesn't know how the internet works.
And he does know how the internet works, net neutrality is bullshit
So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
You could start a web business for free right now. I can send you the links if you want them.The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
I prefer the market. I dont trust the govt, so un5il I see it, Im not taking their word for it.Just get rid of regulations that make it difficult to start these businesses
Ill take my chances.You could start a web business for free right now. I can send you the links if you want them.The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?The govt shouldn't regulate the internet unless it involves crime.
Yiu can say it's going to do this or that like different lanes of traffic, but this shit wasn't around before this regulation. Just get more competition and make it easier to start a business to compete
I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
I prefer the market. I dont trust the govt, so un5il I see it, Im not taking their word for it.Just get rid of regulations that make it difficult to start these businesses
If net neutrality dies, then be prepared to pay off the bare handful of internet providers here in the U.S. to allow people to access your site.
If we need to do something later, then I hope we still have net neutrality. Because if that's gone, then the powers we're fighting will be in charge of our communication on the internet.Ill take my chances.You could start a web business for free right now. I can send you the links if you want them.The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.So if your internet provider loses Drudgereport and Infowars, but holds on to Foxnews and TheBlaze.... would you keep or switch providers? Or would you prefer to still be able to visit all those sites?
I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
I prefer the market. I dont trust the govt, so un5il I see it, Im not taking their word for it.Just get rid of regulations that make it difficult to start these businesses
If net neutrality dies, then be prepared to pay off the bare handful of internet providers here in the U.S. to allow people to access your site.
If we need to do something later, then we can. I see this as a false flag power grab
If we need to do something later, then I hope we still have net neutrality. Because if that's gone, then the powers we're fighting will be in charge of our communication on the internet.Ill take my chances.You could start a web business for free right now. I can send you the links if you want them.The rationale is that there are only a handful of internet providers, and they could make tons of money by dictating what internet flows through their services. If you want access to all of the internet, then you should support net neutrality.I would switch to one. I don't trust the bullshit from the govt. Their solution is worse than the disease. But I've had Internet for 26 years and have never seen that, what's the rational for it now?
I prefer the market. I dont trust the govt, so un5il I see it, Im not taking their word for it.Just get rid of regulations that make it difficult to start these businesses
If net neutrality dies, then be prepared to pay off the bare handful of internet providers here in the U.S. to allow people to access your site.
If we need to do something later, then we can. I see this as a false flag power grab
Nope...the fascist democrat racists won't like that pick......will be upset with this development....oh wait it was never a constituency, Trump entertained
Trump names new FCC chairman: Ajit Pai, who wants to take a 'weed whacker' to net neutrality
