White race acceptance, and promotion of Homosexuality, and Homo marriage, is immoral.

GHook was responding to 52 - it was 52 who raise the 'African' countries, not GHook. It is ridiculous to say one person can discuss Africa but the other cannot. That's racist, Charlie.


Try understanding what I'm saying CG, African Americans and Congolese are two different peoples, so just because Congolese do one thing doesn't mean all blacks do the same thing.

I do get it Charlie.... But GHook didn't raise it, 52 did. Why single out GHook and not 52? The comparison was made by 52... GHook just responded to it. Therefore, you should take 52 to task over the comparison, mo chara.
 
The only evidence of homosexuality is homosexual behavior and that mostly entails homosexual sex, there#s no way of getting around that.
 
And just WTF are you to sit in judgment, Bass?

Stinking fish mouth of hate.

I'm not sitting in judgment, just giving my opinion and I think its deplorable to compare a sexual lifestyle to an ethnic group just to make it more acceptable. I'm black and I certainly do not see myself as anything like a gay person.

Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.
 
I'm not sitting in judgment, just giving my opinion and I think its deplorable to compare a sexual lifestyle to an ethnic group just to make it more acceptable. I'm black and I certainly do not see myself as anything like a gay person.

Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

So you are alright with rejecting a certain group of people?
And you obviously don't watch LOGO, it is very excepted among black people. Just not stupid bigots like you.
 
I'm not sitting in judgment, just giving my opinion and I think its deplorable to compare a sexual lifestyle to an ethnic group just to make it more acceptable. I'm black and I certainly do not see myself as anything like a gay person.

Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

I see your point.... but..... if homosexuality is so abhorrent to blacks (and I really hate lumping any one into a 'group') surely they wouldn't vote for a party that proclaims itself as defender of 'gays'? I don't understand that. To me, I don't like when someone says "white people think XXX" or "white people do XXX" so it is equally offensive when anyone says "black people think XXXX" - even if you're black.... no one speaks on behalf of anyone else.

But.... I don't actually have a problem with gays - because I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me. I am not anti gay 'marriage' - except that I only recognize 'marriage' as a religious ceremony and, in that, my Church does not and will not accept gay 'marriage'. As far as I am concerned, how 'gays' or anyone else lives is not my business.
 
Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

I see your point.... but..... if homosexuality is so abhorrent to blacks (and I really hate lumping any one into a 'group') surely they wouldn't vote for a party that proclaims itself as defender of 'gays'? I don't understand that. To me, I don't like when someone says "white people think XXX" or "white people do XXX" so it is equally offensive when anyone says "black people think XXXX" - even if you're black.... no one speaks on behalf of anyone else.

But.... I don't actually have a problem with gays - because I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me. I am not anti gay 'marriage' - except that I only recognize 'marriage' as a religious ceremony and, in that, my Church does not and will not accept gay 'marriage'. As far as I am concerned, how 'gays' or anyone else lives is not my business.


I feel the same how you feel about gay, I just hate it when they say that those who don't share their same views are homophobic. Not everyone that votes for and or identifies with a political party agrees with everything that party advocates and supports.
 
Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

So you are alright with rejecting a certain group of people?
And you obviously don't watch LOGO, it is very excepted among black people. Just not stupid bigots like you.

Homosexuality isn't "very accepted" among black people and I never said I believe in rejecting anyone, I reject the notion that being gay is the "new black," I don't like it when groups of people hijack the black experience in America to promote and push their agenda.
 
Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

I see your point.... but..... if homosexuality is so abhorrent to blacks (and I really hate lumping any one into a 'group') surely they wouldn't vote for a party that proclaims itself as defender of 'gays'? I don't understand that. To me, I don't like when someone says "white people think XXX" or "white people do XXX" so it is equally offensive when anyone says "black people think XXXX" - even if you're black.... no one speaks on behalf of anyone else.

But.... I don't actually have a problem with gays - because I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me. I am not anti gay 'marriage' - except that I only recognize 'marriage' as a religious ceremony and, in that, my Church does not and will not accept gay 'marriage'. As far as I am concerned, how 'gays' or anyone else lives is not my business.


I feel the same how you feel about gay, I just hate it when they say that those who don't share their same views are homophobic. Not everyone that votes for and or identifies with a political party agrees with everything that party advocates and supports.

They just need to label ya, Charlie. It's easier than actually making the effort to understand where you're coming from. According to the terminally stupid, I 'hate' you cuz you black, and you 'hate' me cuz I is white.... Funny shit, huh? :lol::lol::lol:
 
I see your point.... but..... if homosexuality is so abhorrent to blacks (and I really hate lumping any one into a 'group') surely they wouldn't vote for a party that proclaims itself as defender of 'gays'? I don't understand that. To me, I don't like when someone says "white people think XXX" or "white people do XXX" so it is equally offensive when anyone says "black people think XXXX" - even if you're black.... no one speaks on behalf of anyone else.

But.... I don't actually have a problem with gays - because I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me. I am not anti gay 'marriage' - except that I only recognize 'marriage' as a religious ceremony and, in that, my Church does not and will not accept gay 'marriage'. As far as I am concerned, how 'gays' or anyone else lives is not my business.


I feel the same how you feel about gay, I just hate it when they say that those who don't share their same views are homophobic. Not everyone that votes for and or identifies with a political party agrees with everything that party advocates and supports.

They just need to label ya, Charlie. It's easier than actually making the effort to understand where you're coming from. According to the terminally stupid, I 'hate' you cuz you black, and you 'hate' me cuz I is white.... Funny shit, huh? :lol::lol::lol:

Well, its impossible to control how others label you. BTW, I think Flaylo likes to call you racist because of your reaction, I know you're talking about him.
 
BLACK_GAYS_FOR_JUSTICE.jpg
 
Because they don't understand when people say "Gay is the New Black."

They don't mean that gays are slaves and sit at separate restaurant tables. What they mean is that just like people way back when didn't understand that being black was a part of who blacks are and they are just as deserving of the same freedoms and rights, homosexuality is a biological orientation and they are just as deserving of the same freedoms and rights.
 
Last edited:
Because they don't understand when people say "Gay is the New Black."

They don't mean that gays are slaves and sit at separate restaurant tables. What they mean is that just like people way back when didn't understand that being black was a part of who blacks are and they are just as deserving of the same freedoms and rights, homosexuality is a biological orientation and they are just as deserving of the same freedoms and rights.

Why not say gay in the new Jew instead on black?
 
I think Jews had an easier time here than blacks did.

That isn't the point, you don't compare a group who's only identified by their sexual acts to an ethnic group who went through struggles, they need to get their own instead of hijacking other people's legacy.
 
Genuine question, Charlie.... cuz you and I both know that neither of us are racists (despite what the droolers on the board might 'think')....

If blacks are fundamentally against homosexuality, why do the majority vote Democrat? Since the Dems are the SELF-PROCLAIMED defenders of gays, does it not seem odd to you that they would vote for the party that tries to grab the 'gay' highground?

Voting Democratic doesn't mean one is prohomosexual or has to be prohomosexual and being Republican doesn't mean one is antihomosexual.

As for 52, he is right that homosexuality is rejected by blacks overwhelmingly, but that holds true for all so called races, its just that white mainstream media has made homosexuality appear more acceptable among whites than it really is thus perception becomes reality for some people.

I see your point.... but..... if homosexuality is so abhorrent to blacks (and I really hate lumping any one into a 'group') surely they wouldn't vote for a party that proclaims itself as defender of 'gays'? I don't understand that. To me, I don't like when someone says "white people think XXX" or "white people do XXX" so it is equally offensive when anyone says "black people think XXXX" - even if you're black.... no one speaks on behalf of anyone else.

But.... I don't actually have a problem with gays - because I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me. I am not anti gay 'marriage' - except that I only recognize 'marriage' as a religious ceremony and, in that, my Church does not and will not accept gay 'marriage'. As far as I am concerned, how 'gays' or anyone else lives is not my business.

This is a typical white liberal response," I don't care what any individual does in their life, as long as it does not impact on me".

I say typical white liberal response , because I hear this statement time and time
again coming out the mouths of white liberal types.

Well one of the main reasons the Ugandan MP introduced a death penalty legislation
for Uganda, using his words " We are concerned about how homosexuality will impact on the minds of our young children."

So when a majority of you "White Liberals" say , you don't care what homosexuals do,
because it does not "impact on your life" , you are actually wrong with that statement.
When a young impressionable child sees a homosexual, weather male or female,kissing in public, or holding hands, it can
cause confusion within the child mind. Or outright trauma, or momentary conflict.
So, what a homosexuals do "does have an impact on some ones life", it may not be yours,
but there may be deep rooted psychological problems, that may be caused by exposure
to homosexuals, or their activity, with regards to young impressionable children.

Your statement is flawed California Girl.:razz:

P.S. The Psychologist Maslow states that children tend to form permanent "engrams" within their mind during the ages from 3 to 10 years old, that will stay with them for the rest of their adult life.
I am talking about permanent memory engrams, that will shape their personality and what type of person they become. Another reason not to allow homosexuals to adopt young children.!,or expose them to homosexuality.!!!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top