MAGAman
Pro-American Patriot
You tards seem confused.
In America, we investigate before we go to trial.
In America, we investigate before we go to trial.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So why doesn't he?He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.
why didn't the house bring them in then? It couldn't have been that overwhelming.Cool.....as long we get to hear from Bolton, Mulvaney and Pompeo....Rick Perry, Rudy Giuliani...and those two guys that ACTUALLY GOT ARRESTED for what they did on behalf of Trump and Rudy...deal??Well, there is nothing wrong with establishing the reason for the phone call, is there???
And once Creepy Uncle Joe and his crackhead son are put in the witness chair, it's all over for the Democrats!!!
I am sure Trump would take that offer -- if he wasn't guilty
Trump did nothing wrong.
He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.
Then why not let Bolton and Rudy testify?
Trump did nothing wrong.
He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.
Then why not let Bolton and Rudy testify?
Because the (witch hunt) investigation part of the process is over.
That's why.
Your leftarded leaders could have went to court with subpoenas, etc and blew it.
You should punish them by voting for Trump next time.
Trump did nothing wrong.
He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.
Trump did nothing wrong.
He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.
Is that why he has blocked everyone who has been subpoenaed.
then at trials...they have witnesses and stuff....You tards seem confused.
In America, we investigate before we go to trial.
Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe
You mean Bidens extortion and money laundering Operation right?Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe
Frank, all you know about either Biden or Burisma is what our Liar-in-Chief told you. And his "personal lawyer" has hired the very guy that got canned for corruption to finger Biden for a quid pro quo. Although you'll never see it or hear him, there is an interview where Parnas sings like a canary and clears up a bunch of the lies. You know full well how Trump tosses diversions hither and yon to get you to look somewhere away from him, and it appears you are grateful for Tattling Trump's handing you a solution to spout so you do not have to face facts.You mean Bidens extortion and money laundering Operation right?Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe
How many other Foreign gas companies did Biden apply to?
Did Burisma reach out to Biden and ask what they should do?