White House Fears Senate Democrat May Have The Vote On Calling Witnesses

[MAGAman]

You tards seem confused.

In America, we investigate before we go to trial.

 

[Chuz Life]

He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.

So why doesn't he?

Im betting he will... or the Senate will, anyway.

Just can't wait to see all the leftarded heads exploding.

 

[jc456]

Trump playing with the left some more I see.

 

[jc456]

Well, there is nothing wrong with establishing the reason for the phone call, is there???

And once Creepy Uncle Joe and his crackhead son are put in the witness chair, it's all over for the Democrats!!!

Cool.....as long we get to hear from Bolton, Mulvaney and Pompeo....Rick Perry, Rudy Giuliani...and those two guys that ACTUALLY GOT ARRESTED for what they did on behalf of Trump and Rudy...deal??



I am sure Trump would take that offer -- if he wasn't guilty

why didn't the house bring them in then? It couldn't have been that overwhelming.

 

[Chuz Life]

Trump did nothing wrong.

He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.

Then why not let Bolton and Rudy testify?

Because the (witch hunt) investigation part of the process is over.

That's why.

Your leftarded leaders could have went to court with subpoenas, etc and blew it.

You should punish them by voting for Trump next time.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Trump did nothing wrong.

He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.

Then why not let Bolton and Rudy testify?

Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe

 

[JoeB131]

Because the (witch hunt) investigation part of the process is over.

That's why.

Your leftarded leaders could have went to court with subpoenas, etc and blew it.

You should punish them by voting for Trump next time.

Naw, we'll impeach Trump. And he'll either cover up what he did or we'll have witnesses who will establish his guilt.

Jesus Fucking Christ, Fetus-boy, did you ever watch an episode of Law and Order? The Defense brings out witnesses that bolster supposed innocence. If Bolton and Guiliani can prove Trump was innocent, he'd WANT them to testify.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Trump did nothing wrong.

He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.

Is that why he has blocked everyone who has been subpoenaed.

 

[Chuz Life]

Trump did nothing wrong.

He would have no problem finding witneses and precedence to make that known.

Is that why he has blocked everyone who has been subpoenaed.

There are legal ways via the courts to remove those (executive privilege) blocks.

Nanzi Pelouszi elected not to do that.

That's on her.

Executive privilege exists for (and is frequently used for ) a reason. And both sides historically have used and been accused of abusing it.

Nanzi had a weak case and she knew it.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

You tards seem confused.

In America, we investigate before we go to trial.

then at trials...they have witnesses and stuff....

They have a witness stand and everything.....

I see it on Law and Order all the time.....

 

[bullwinkle]

Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe

Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe

Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?

You mean Bidens extortion and money laundering Operation right?

How many other Foreign gas companies did Biden apply to?

Did Burisma reach out to Biden and ask what they should do?

 

[bullwinkle]

Sure along with Hunter, Schiff, Eric Ciaramella and Quid Pro Joe

Frank, it's a bluff. Now that the House has handed over the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Pelosi is out of it. But I do wish the House managers would say, "Sure, Bring on Hunter and Biden and Schiff!" They are a Republican dodge, is all. Can any of them speak to the issue of Trump's extortion of Ukraine?

You mean Bidens extortion and money laundering Operation right?

How many other Foreign gas companies did Biden apply to?

Did Burisma reach out to Biden and ask what they should do?

Frank, all you know about either Biden or Burisma is what our Liar-in-Chief told you. And his "personal lawyer" has hired the very guy that got canned for corruption to finger Biden for a quid pro quo. Although you'll never see it or hear him, there is an interview where Parnas sings like a canary and clears up a bunch of the lies. You know full well how Trump tosses diversions hither and yon to get you to look somewhere away from him, and it appears you are grateful for Tattling Trump's handing you a solution to spout so you do not have to face facts.