Which would be more disappointing for conservatives?

This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

2. because I've already assigned Dubya a place in 9th Circle in Dante's Inferno for being such a lying scumbag about being a "Compassionate" Conservative, there's no room down there and the country will not survive with 1 or 2.

An Obama reelection would be the end of the American Experiment and I'd eventually either move to Brazil or the first state to secede from the USSA
 
Well since Romney isn't a conservative I fail to see how there is anything but disappointment for a real conservative this election cycle.

Well that's okay because Obama isn't really a progressive, so I'm not getting my hope up either way.

Sure he is. Progressives bow to the Marxist ideology. Rebranding and sold back as new even though it's simply socialists looking for communisism...."progressives".
 
Except that is CON$ervoFascist bullshit.
Bush destroyed the economy and it is recovering under Obama, and it's that recovery that CON$ervoFascists hate.

Jimmy Carter through Barney Frank destroyed our economy.
Bullshit!

Carter hadn't been president for almost 30 years when Bush destroyed the economy and Frank was one lone powerless congressman, but to mindless CON$ervoFascists anybody and everybody is more powerful than Bush. :cuckoo:

Carter signed the legislation that Frank and others shoved down America's neck in order to give the poor something they didn't deserve nor earn. Bush was simply in office when the bubble burst. This collapse is a liberal disaster supported by some dimwitted republicans.
 
Jimmy Carter through Barney Frank destroyed our economy.
Bullshit!

Carter hadn't been president for almost 30 years when Bush destroyed the economy and Frank was one lone powerless congressman, but to mindless CON$ervoFascists anybody and everybody is more powerful than Bush. :cuckoo:

Carter signed the legislation that Frank and others shoved down America's neck in order to give the poor something they didn't deserve nor earn. Bush was simply in office when the bubble burst. This collapse is a liberal disaster supported by some dimwitted republicans.
Bullshit!

Carter was not president when Bush signed the ADDI, American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which made no down payment loans to people with bad credit, before this law you had to have good credit to get a no down payment loan, who couldn't make the payments and had to earn at least 20% less than the average income of the area they were buying into, and for more than the property was worth. Bush did this to try to take minority voters away from the Dems in the run up to the 2004 election and bragged about adding 5 million new minority homeowners throughout the 2004 campaign. Bush signed the law in Dec 2003 and starting 2004 the sub-prime loans exploded. Bush alone owns the housing crash.

Homeownership is also an important part of our economic vitality. If -- when we meet this project, this goal, according to our Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, we will have added an additional $256 billion to the economy by encouraging 5.5 million new home owners in America.
- George W Bush Oct. 15, 2002
 
Last edited:
Bullshit!

Carter hadn't been president for almost 30 years when Bush destroyed the economy and Frank was one lone powerless congressman, but to mindless CON$ervoFascists anybody and everybody is more powerful than Bush. :cuckoo:

Carter signed the legislation that Frank and others shoved down America's neck in order to give the poor something they didn't deserve nor earn. Bush was simply in office when the bubble burst. This collapse is a liberal disaster supported by some dimwitted republicans.
Bullshit!

Carter was not president when Bush signed the ADDI, American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which made no down payment loans to people with bad credit, before this law you had to have good credit to get a no down payment loan, who couldn't make the payments and had to earn at least 20% less than the average income of the area they were buying into, and for more than the property was worth. Bush did this to try to take minority voters away from the Dems in the run up to the 2004 election and bragged about adding 5 million new minority homeowners throughout the 2004 campaign. Bush signed the law in Dec 2003 and starting 2004 the sub-prime loans exploded. Bush alone owns the housing crash.

Homeownership is also an important part of our economic vitality. If -- when we meet this project, this goal, according to our Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, we will have added an additional $256 billion to the economy by encouraging 5.5 million new home owners in America.
- George W Bush Oct. 15, 2002

Do cows ever shit in your world or just bulls?

Without the previous legislation your scenario is moot. The bush administration saw the red flags and tried to rein things in but congress wouldn't budge. And Barney Frank was leading the opposition.

As to the bill you pointed out that is yet another liberal idea that was promoted by bush (a big spender). Had he been a democrat you would be defending the bill.
 
This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

Given the likelihood of SCOTUS appointees- thats an easy one. Obama's reelection would be more disappointing.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
What's reality is 4 months ago you guys were all calling him a moderate rhino in an attempt to sideline him in the elections. That failed so now he is a far right extremist. Reality is you guys are so transparent its laughable.
A Rockefeller establishment Republican IS a RINO to the far right extremist, and those very same far right extremists who despise all RINOs will support a RINO because they have NO principles!!!

Or because Obama is destroying our economy. :eusa_whistle:
How is he doing that? Presidents cannot pass legislation.

Make sure you include examples, or I'm just going to call you a retard.
 
A Rockefeller establishment Republican IS a RINO to the far right extremist, and those very same far right extremists who despise all RINOs will support a RINO because they have NO principles!!!

Or because Obama is destroying our economy. :eusa_whistle:
How is he doing that? Presidents cannot pass legislation.

Make sure you include examples, or I'm just going to call you a retard.

I've seen you play this game before and I know the outcome. You're going to disagree and call me that anyway so what's the point?
 
This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

If those were my only two choices, I would have to settle for no more changes Romney administration. That is better than more of Obama's change. God only knows what he has up his sleeve for the next term.

I think Obama is actually going to win. Come Election Day, more people are going to stay home on the Right than on the Left, and that is what is going to determine the outcome.
 
This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

If those were my only two choices, I would have to settle for no more changes Romney administration. That is better than more of Obama's change. God only knows what he has up his sleeve for the next term.

I think Obama is actually going to win. Come Election Day, more people are going to stay home on the Right than on the Left, and that is what is going to determine the outcome.

I think the opposite is true just because obama has been so bad.
 
Well since Romney isn't a conservative I fail to see how there is anything but disappointment for a real conservative this election cycle.

Well that's okay because Obama isn't really a progressive, so I'm not getting my hope up either way.

Sure he is. Progressives bow to the Marxist ideology. Rebranding and sold back as new even though it's simply socialists looking for communisism...."progressives".

No way he's a progressive, socialist or a communist.
 
Carter signed the legislation that Frank and others shoved down America's neck in order to give the poor something they didn't deserve nor earn. Bush was simply in office when the bubble burst. This collapse is a liberal disaster supported by some dimwitted republicans.
Bullshit!

Carter was not president when Bush signed the ADDI, American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which made no down payment loans to people with bad credit, before this law you had to have good credit to get a no down payment loan, who couldn't make the payments and had to earn at least 20% less than the average income of the area they were buying into, and for more than the property was worth. Bush did this to try to take minority voters away from the Dems in the run up to the 2004 election and bragged about adding 5 million new minority homeowners throughout the 2004 campaign. Bush signed the law in Dec 2003 and starting 2004 the sub-prime loans exploded. Bush alone owns the housing crash.

Homeownership is also an important part of our economic vitality. If -- when we meet this project, this goal, according to our Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, we will have added an additional $256 billion to the economy by encouraging 5.5 million new home owners in America.
- George W Bush Oct. 15, 2002

Do cows ever shit in your world or just bulls?

Without the previous legislation your scenario is moot. The bush administration saw the red flags and tried to rein things in but congress wouldn't budge. And Barney Frank was leading the opposition.

As to the bill you pointed out that is yet another liberal idea that was promoted by bush (a big spender). Had he been a democrat you would be defending the bill.
BULLSHIT!

The bill passed the GOP House over powerless Frank's opposition, only to be killed in committee by the GOP controlled Senate!!! The GOP killed their own "reform" bill and now you try to blame the powerless Frank because you are too STUPID to check anything for yourself and only swallow the bullshit GOP hate radio feeds you.
 
This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

If we don't change course, we're doomed. If Romney wins, I hope he is man enough to take responsibility for whatever happens instead of blaming the previous administration.

Either of your choices are bad news for this country.

Yep he should defiantly not blame the passage of obamacare on Obama that would just be ridiculous and unmanly of him
 
Bullshit!

Carter was not president when Bush signed the ADDI, American Dream Downpayment Initiative, which made no down payment loans to people with bad credit, before this law you had to have good credit to get a no down payment loan, who couldn't make the payments and had to earn at least 20% less than the average income of the area they were buying into, and for more than the property was worth. Bush did this to try to take minority voters away from the Dems in the run up to the 2004 election and bragged about adding 5 million new minority homeowners throughout the 2004 campaign. Bush signed the law in Dec 2003 and starting 2004 the sub-prime loans exploded. Bush alone owns the housing crash.

Homeownership is also an important part of our economic vitality. If -- when we meet this project, this goal, according to our Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, we will have added an additional $256 billion to the economy by encouraging 5.5 million new home owners in America.
- George W Bush Oct. 15, 2002

Do cows ever shit in your world or just bulls?

Without the previous legislation your scenario is moot. The bush administration saw the red flags and tried to rein things in but congress wouldn't budge. And Barney Frank was leading the opposition.

As to the bill you pointed out that is yet another liberal idea that was promoted by bush (a big spender). Had he been a democrat you would be defending the bill.
BULLSHIT!

The bill passed the GOP House over powerless Frank's opposition, only to be killed in committee by the GOP controlled Senate!!! The GOP killed their own "reform" bill and now you try to blame the powerless Frank because you are too STUPID to check anything for yourself and only swallow the bullshit GOP hate radio feeds you.

Are you stupid or just blind? I CLEARLY stated earlier that there were GOP dimwits that played a roll. But that does not change the fact that THIS IS A COLLAPSE BASED ON LIBERAL IDEOLOGIES
 
This question is for conservatives or those who intend to vote for Romney.

Just wondering which of these two scenarios would be more disappointing for you? And why.

1) Romney loses and Obama is reelected

2) Romney wins and nothing changes from Obamas presidency. He doesn't actually repeal Obamacare, the troops are still off fighting wars and everything else pretty much just carries over from Obama.

So which would disappoint you more and why?

I'll probably sit this election out (first time I will not have voted in the presidential election since I got the right to vote in 1972...) 'cause both candidates make me wanna puke, and my state is safely going in one direction so my vote won't matter...

but I'd rather have puke Romney in office instead of puke Obama, if only for SCOTUS Second Amendment concerns...
 

Forum List

Back
Top