Which is worse

[Seawytch]

Is a hypothetical thing that did not happen worse than something that actually did happen. Hmmm [emoji848]

Good question, since there was no Russian/Trump collusion (but there was with the Hillary campaign) and the FBI/DOJ corruption has been proven, I have to agree. actual happenings are worse than hypotheticals. thanks for pointing that out.

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

Heir Mewler will not touch the Clinton campaign, he loves the Clintons. He doesn't care that Russians gave the Clinton foundation 145 million just after she approved the uranium one deal and that Russians paid bill Clinton 450K for a 20 minute speech in Moscow at that same time. he doesn't care that the Clinton campaign paid Russians to create the fake dossier.

this is corruption at its worst, throw in Strzok, Comey, McCabe, and Lynch and you have the makings of a banana republic.

You are seriously lost in conspiracy land.

so Strzok was not trying to manipulate the election? his girlfriend Page says otherwise. what do you know that she doesn't?

Again with the appalling lack of links. It's noticed how you don't support your conspiracy theories with links.

No, Strzok was conducting an investigation. If he had wanted to "manipulate the election", all he would have had to do was leak that the Trump campaign was under investigation.

Comey just had to come out and tell us about the emails found on a laptop, but we didn't know there was an active counterintelligence investigation into members of the Trump campaign until after the election. How does you deep state conspiracy explain that?

 

[Seawytch]

Is a hypothetical thing that did not happen worse than something that actually did happen. Hmmm [emoji848]

Good question, since there was no Russian/Trump collusion (but there was with the Hillary campaign) and the FBI/DOJ corruption has been proven, I have to agree. actual happenings are worse than hypotheticals. thanks for pointing that out.

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

Heir Mewler will not touch the Clinton campaign, he loves the Clintons. He doesn't care that Russians gave the Clinton foundation 145 million just after she approved the uranium one deal and that Russians paid bill Clinton 450K for a 20 minute speech in Moscow at that same time. he doesn't care that the Clinton campaign paid Russians to create the fake dossier.

this is corruption at its worst, throw in Strzok, Comey, McCabe, and Lynch and you have the makings of a banana republic.

You are seriously lost in conspiracy land.

your sig cartoon shows your partisan stupidity. you are a waste of my time.

My signature cartoon beautifully encapsulates the current state of the Trump/Putin/GOP relationship.

 

[Seawytch]

Is a hypothetical thing that did not happen worse than something that actually did happen. Hmmm [emoji848]

Good question, since there was no Russian/Trump collusion (but there was with the Hillary campaign) and the FBI/DOJ corruption has been proven, I have to agree. actual happenings are worse than hypotheticals. thanks for pointing that out.

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

so Mewler now knows that 12 Russians hacked the DNC servers, but he has not looked at the servers because the DNC refuses to release them, so what is his evidence to indict these Russians? without the servers how does he know? just asking

You just keep parroting the illegitimate clowns lies.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t
The president’s bizarre obsession with “the DNC server” defies logic or even a basic understanding of what actually happened.

And to what end? What do you think the physical server would show that they don't have? Do you seriously still not believe that Russians stole information from the DNC servers?

then why does the DNC refuse to release them? what incriminating evidence are they hiding? If everyone knows whats on them and they prove Russian hacking, why not make them public?

don't be so fricken naïve, witchey

I'm not naive, but you are a conspiracy theorist just like your cult leader. Read the link.

 

[Seawytch]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

 

[Seawytch]

Oh, now were expanding. It's not just politicians you won't provide links for. Now we're going to throw Black Lives Matter and Antifa into the mix too?

Protest isn't incivility or hate silly boy.

How about some in context quotes with links? You keep going with your weird Tourette syndrome, but no links.

antifa riots - Google Search

Unite the Right rally - Wikipedia

one example of a few far right wing morons. I gave you thousands of examples of left wing violence, you have one, BFD

No you didn't. You provided examples of people protesting. You've failed miserably in trying to support your claim. There isn't anyone more uncivil than the illegitimate Orange buffoon occupying the oval office.

look idiot, its ok if you don't like trump, I never liked obozo the Kenyan messiah, but I live through his 8 years of trying to destroy this country.

unemployment is at all time lows, the economy is booming, there are more jobs than job seekers, the numbers of welfare and food stamps are coming down (except in California, wonder why). our country is strong militarily, NK has been brought to the table, China has been called out on its unfair trade practices, NATO members are finally paying their fair share.

I don't care if Trump is a brash New Yorker who likes pretty women, he is the best president of my lifetime and I have been here since Truman.

 

[Redfish]

Good question, since there was no Russian/Trump collusion (but there was with the Hillary campaign) and the FBI/DOJ corruption has been proven, I have to agree. actual happenings are worse than hypotheticals. thanks for pointing that out.

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

Heir Mewler will not touch the Clinton campaign, he loves the Clintons. He doesn't care that Russians gave the Clinton foundation 145 million just after she approved the uranium one deal and that Russians paid bill Clinton 450K for a 20 minute speech in Moscow at that same time. he doesn't care that the Clinton campaign paid Russians to create the fake dossier.

this is corruption at its worst, throw in Strzok, Comey, McCabe, and Lynch and you have the makings of a banana republic.

You are seriously lost in conspiracy land.

your sig cartoon shows your partisan stupidity. you are a waste of my time.

My signature cartoon beautifully encapsulates the current state of the Trump/Putin/GOP relationship.

only in the warped minds of idiots like you and whoopi, do you lust for her?

 

[Kosh]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

 

[Redfish]

Good question, since there was no Russian/Trump collusion (but there was with the Hillary campaign) and the FBI/DOJ corruption has been proven, I have to agree. actual happenings are worse than hypotheticals. thanks for pointing that out.

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

so Mewler now knows that 12 Russians hacked the DNC servers, but he has not looked at the servers because the DNC refuses to release them, so what is his evidence to indict these Russians? without the servers how does he know? just asking

You just keep parroting the illegitimate clowns lies.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t
The president’s bizarre obsession with “the DNC server” defies logic or even a basic understanding of what actually happened.

And to what end? What do you think the physical server would show that they don't have? Do you seriously still not believe that Russians stole information from the DNC servers?

then why does the DNC refuse to release them? what incriminating evidence are they hiding? If everyone knows whats on them and they prove Russian hacking, why not make them public?

don't be so fricken naïve, witchey

I'm not naive, but you are a conspiracy theorist just like your cult leader. Read the link.

you are very naïve, coupled with partisanly moronic. you are a waste of time on this forum, you contribute nothing but bullshit propaganda and lies.

 

[Seawytch]

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

Heir Mewler will not touch the Clinton campaign, he loves the Clintons. He doesn't care that Russians gave the Clinton foundation 145 million just after she approved the uranium one deal and that Russians paid bill Clinton 450K for a 20 minute speech in Moscow at that same time. he doesn't care that the Clinton campaign paid Russians to create the fake dossier.

this is corruption at its worst, throw in Strzok, Comey, McCabe, and Lynch and you have the makings of a banana republic.

You are seriously lost in conspiracy land.

your sig cartoon shows your partisan stupidity. you are a waste of my time.

My signature cartoon beautifully encapsulates the current state of the Trump/Putin/GOP relationship.

only in the warped minds of idiots like you and whoopi, do you lust for her?

Keep pooper scooping.

 

[Seawytch]

Mounting evidence is pointing to Americans conspiring with Russia to affect the election outcome. Did you read the latest indictments from Mueller and the NY District Attorney's office? Lots of unnamed Americans in them. Hint, none of them are from the Clinton campaign.

so Mewler now knows that 12 Russians hacked the DNC servers, but he has not looked at the servers because the DNC refuses to release them, so what is his evidence to indict these Russians? without the servers how does he know? just asking

You just keep parroting the illegitimate clowns lies.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t
The president’s bizarre obsession with “the DNC server” defies logic or even a basic understanding of what actually happened.

And to what end? What do you think the physical server would show that they don't have? Do you seriously still not believe that Russians stole information from the DNC servers?

then why does the DNC refuse to release them? what incriminating evidence are they hiding? If everyone knows whats on them and they prove Russian hacking, why not make them public?

don't be so fricken naïve, witchey

I'm not naive, but you are a conspiracy theorist just like your cult leader. Read the link.

you are very naïve, coupled with partisanly moronic. you are a waste of time on this forum, you contribute nothing but bullshit propaganda and lies.

No fishy, that's what you peddle. But instead of bullshit, it's Russian. You're in the "useful idiot" category of Russian propaganda spreading.

 

[Seawytch]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

 

[Kosh]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

 

[Redfish]

so Mewler now knows that 12 Russians hacked the DNC servers, but he has not looked at the servers because the DNC refuses to release them, so what is his evidence to indict these Russians? without the servers how does he know? just asking

You just keep parroting the illegitimate clowns lies.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t
The president’s bizarre obsession with “the DNC server” defies logic or even a basic understanding of what actually happened.

And to what end? What do you think the physical server would show that they don't have? Do you seriously still not believe that Russians stole information from the DNC servers?

then why does the DNC refuse to release them? what incriminating evidence are they hiding? If everyone knows whats on them and they prove Russian hacking, why not make them public?

don't be so fricken naïve, witchey

I'm not naive, but you are a conspiracy theorist just like your cult leader. Read the link.

you are very naïve, coupled with partisanly moronic. you are a waste of time on this forum, you contribute nothing but bullshit propaganda and lies.

No fishy, that's what you peddle. But instead of bullshit, it's Russian. You're in the "useful idiot" category of Russian propaganda spreading.

the Russians did not hack our election, but the DNC, the FBI, and the Obama DOJ tried and failed. They were convinced that the hildabitch would win and the truth would never come out, but the bitch lost and they are losing their tiny minds over it.

you are one of their useful idiots, unable to think for yourself or put together a cogent statement about anything.

you waste my time and the time of others with your inane ramblings, back to the ignore list for you.

 

[Seawytch]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

The link was already provided. Are you lazy or, like Trump, can't read very well?

Which is worse

 

[Seawytch]

You just keep parroting the illegitimate clowns lies.

What Mueller Knows About the DNC Hack—And Trump Doesn’t
The president’s bizarre obsession with “the DNC server” defies logic or even a basic understanding of what actually happened.

And to what end? What do you think the physical server would show that they don't have? Do you seriously still not believe that Russians stole information from the DNC servers?

then why does the DNC refuse to release them? what incriminating evidence are they hiding? If everyone knows whats on them and they prove Russian hacking, why not make them public?

don't be so fricken naïve, witchey

I'm not naive, but you are a conspiracy theorist just like your cult leader. Read the link.

you are very naïve, coupled with partisanly moronic. you are a waste of time on this forum, you contribute nothing but bullshit propaganda and lies.

No fishy, that's what you peddle. But instead of bullshit, it's Russian. You're in the "useful idiot" category of Russian propaganda spreading.

the Russians did not hack our election, but the DNC, the FBI, and the Obama DOJ tried and failed. They were convinced that the hildabitch would win and the truth would never come out, but the bitch lost and they are losing their tiny minds over it.

you are one of their useful idiots, unable to think for yourself or put together a cogent statement about anything.

you waste my time and the time of others with your inane ramblings, back to the ignore list for you.

See, right there you prove you're not tethered to reality. Yes, Russians hacked the DNC (and the RNC) weaponized the stolen data and used it to help Trump win. These are facts not in question by anyone who is not insane.

 

[Kosh]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

The link was already provided. Are you lazy or, like Trump, can't read very well?

Which is worse

See the far left drone once again can not provide a link to their plagiarism.

The link they provided takes you to page there of this thread with no post from them with any link!

Just post the link again, why is it so hard?

 

[Redfish]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

The link was already provided. Are you lazy or, like Trump, can't read very well?

Which is worse

See the far left drone once again can not provide a link to their plagiarism.

The link they provided takes you to page there of this thread with no post from them with any link!

Just post the link again, why is it so hard?

because she has zero credibility, join me in putting her on ignore.

 

[Seawytch]

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

The link was already provided. Are you lazy or, like Trump, can't read very well?

Which is worse

See the far left drone once again can not provide a link to their plagiarism.

The link they provided takes you to page there of this thread with no post from them with any link!

Just post the link again, why is it so hard?

because she has zero credibility, join me in putting her on ignore.

Awww, is snowflake fishy going to pretend to put me on ignore because facts don't support his conspiracy theories? Gee, couldn't seen that coming.

 

[Seawytch]

Trump’s view is unmoored from reality in several ways.

Three days earlier, special counsel Robert Mueller published an indictment of 12 officers from the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, for interfering in the 2016 U.S. election, including by hacking into the DNC. The indictment is historically unprecedented in scope and detail. The FBI named-and-shamed two specific GRU units, their commanding officers and 10 subordinate officers while revealing stunning details of Russia’s hacking tradecraft. And a close read of it all shows why Trump’s “DNC didn’t give the server to the FBI” conspiracy theory makes no sense.

First off, CrowdStrike, the company the DNC brought in to initially investigate and remediate the hack, actually shared images of the DNC servers with the FBI. For the purposes of an investigation of this type, images are much more useful than handing over metal and hardware, because they are bit-by-bit copies of a crime scene taken while the crime was going on. Live hard drive and memory snapshots of blinking, powered-on machines in a network reveal significantly more forensic data than some powered-off server removed from a network. It’s the difference between watching a house over time, carefully noting down who comes and goes and when and how, versus handing over a key to a lonely boarded-up building. By physically handing over a server to the FBI as Trump suggested, the DNC would in fact have destroyed evidence. (Besides, there wasn’t just one server, but 140.)​

Where di d you cut and paste that from far left drone?

You hypocrites claims others do not provide links and here you plagiarizing!

But far left drone the DNC never handed over their servers for the FBI to look at..

So we do not really know if Russians Hacked it or not, maybe the DNC is covering the fact that Hilary's unsecure was hacked and the evidence is on the DNC servers.

So why did the DNC not turn over their servers to prove it was the Russians?

Silly far left drones!

Oh look, another useful idiot. I had already provided the link that fishy didn't read because he kept parroting Trump's provably idiotic line about the servers...just like you.

See when you ask the far left to provide a link to their plagiarism, they refuse to do it.

So why did the DNC not hand their servers to the FBI for examination?

The link was already provided. Are you lazy or, like Trump, can't read very well?

Which is worse

See the far left drone once again can not provide a link to their plagiarism.

The link they provided takes you to page there of this thread with no post from them with any link!

Just post the link again, why is it so hard?

Of course it does. I've provided the link. Your inability to find it in post #235 that this links to makes you an idiot.