Which is more money? $1,000 for 12 months or $160 for 2 months?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Dec 23, 2011.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,239
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,853
    The idiot GOP caved to stupid ignorant MATH!

    Obama stood up yesterday badgered all of us with these sob stories..
    won't be able buy pizzas, won't be able to visit fatherinlaws or buy school supplies for two months!

    BUT YOU idiot supporters and MSM evidently can't figure out..hmmmm

    $160 for two months IS NOT as much as $1,000 for 12 months!

    GOP wanted full year --- Democrats/Obama wanted for 2 months!

    THAT is IT!!!

    White House has this web site for sob stories about $40 dollars every 2 weeks..
    What does $40 mean to you? | The White House

    NOT ONE WORD THAT GOP WANTED FOR 12 MONTHS..
    OBAMA/DEMOCRATS ONLY 2 MONTHS!
     
  2. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,545
    Thanks Received:
    7,907
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,124
    You haven't noticed yet? The lame stream media is behind obama 100%, and they will lie, spin and misrepresent any and all facts surrounding him and his dealings to protect their boy king. After all, they're all liberals, they're all democrats, they're all socialists, and they all hate America.
     
  3. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,156
    Thanks Received:
    10,167
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,729
    Yep!
     
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,239
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,853
    I NOTICED!!


    "There is a liberal bias. It's demonstrable. You look at some statistics. About 85 percent of the reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic, they have for a long time.
    There is a, particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias.-

    George W. Bush Transcript


    Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Evan Thomas

    Thomas' assertion of 85% reporters vote Democratic is further backed up by:
    "MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission.
    Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes.

    Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties."
    Journalists give campaign cash - politics - msnbc.com
     
  5. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,545
    Thanks Received:
    7,907
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,124
    So the point is, no matter how good of a job the republicans are trying to do for THE PEOPLE of AMERICA, the liberal, democrat, lame stream media will spin and lie to make it appear they're not. Simply put, republicans/conservatives/Tea Party can NOT win the media war against the liberals, so they caved. I just call that gutless. We all know what's going on, so these republicans should be holding on to their principles, the ones they said they had that got them elected, or they might as well start looking for a different job.
     
  6. DontBeStupid
    Offline

    DontBeStupid Look it up!

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,463
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Ratings:
    +422
    Democrats wanted 2 months with no strings attached. GOP wanted 12 months with strings attached.

    Why are you having trouble grasping this?
     
  7. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,298
    Thanks Received:
    11,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,234
    Boehner didn't know how to articulate the facts and didn't have the guts to call Obama out on all of his lies yesterday. This is why he's useless. It's not enough to work behind the scenes for the American people, you must articulate how you're doing it and shed the light on the Democrat's dishonesty.

    If someone were to attach a lie-detecter to Obama during one of his speeches it would explode. This fact must be voiced to the voters or we're screwed come November. It makes me wish Newt was still speaker instead of this stiff.
     
  8. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,298
    Thanks Received:
    11,931
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,234
    Bullshit.

    The primary difference is the time period, not "the strings" that are attached.

    This was an example of political gamesmanship. Boehner doesn't know how to play it simply because he feels shame where as Obama and Harry Reid do not.
     
  9. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,156
    Thanks Received:
    10,167
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,729
    demoncraps suck
     
  10. DontBeStupid
    Offline

    DontBeStupid Look it up!

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    4,463
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Ratings:
    +422
    Oh, so a poorly thought out pipeline had nothing to do with anything?
     

Share This Page