Which candidate will put more money into the Middle Class?

[LeftofLeft]

You do know that the Corporations will add that tax to the price of the goods and servives they provide ?

Maybe they will. But then again it'll be fairer than some companies, the rich ones, being able to sell goods cheaper than the smaller firms because they've bribed their way through the system, wouldn't you say?

Republicans claim to be for business, but appear to only be for big business.

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas might be "creating jobs" as you put it, but taking jobs away from other places. The jobs already existed in the US, the company wanted to have these jobs in the US but they managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal.

The problem that the EU has recognized but the US won't. That if all companies are forced to be fair within a tax system, then you don't get the multinationals essentially going to where they can pay zero tax and then claim it's "creating jobs" when it's not, it's moving jobs around.

"......managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal". Now, continue the alternative, if no part in the United States is willing to give them "the deal", what would be the net impact to the US? Answer: negative job creation......also called "jobs lost". Which scenario do you think Americans prefer?

 

[francoHFW]

Maybe they will. But then again it'll be fairer than some companies, the rich ones, being able to sell goods cheaper than the smaller firms because they've bribed their way through the system, wouldn't you say?

Republicans claim to be for business, but appear to only be for big business.

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas goes up and down like Venezuela according to oil prices.

Some people like to know what's going on in the real world.

Talk about the real world......you mean like real-world Detroit? You mock Texas for going up and down. When was the last time Detroit, Milwaukee, Toledo, Cleveland were UP? Especially Detroit and Milwaukee......Democrat controlled for a Century and running and what do Democrat policies have to show for it? Let's watch with amusement as Franco pulls out his tired and tried dupe-card or blame all of those rust-belt Republicans for "obstruction". Democrat policies have and continue to fail. It's time for change. To quote Obama, "we tried that and it didn't work".

Don't forget Buffalo, now having a renaissance thanks to Dem STATE gov't. Blaming Dem city gov't in Reaganist America is a joke for dupes ONLY.

It's not rust belt Republicans you IDIOT, it's the national ones. See sig pp1. Change the channel, dupe.

 

[LaDexter]

Bill Clinton promised a MIDDLE CLASS TAX CUT

Bill Clinton LIED


That's the evidence we have on Hillary's "promises"

 

[francoHFW]

Maybe they will. But then again it'll be fairer than some companies, the rich ones, being able to sell goods cheaper than the smaller firms because they've bribed their way through the system, wouldn't you say?

Republicans claim to be for business, but appear to only be for big business.

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas might be "creating jobs" as you put it, but taking jobs away from other places. The jobs already existed in the US, the company wanted to have these jobs in the US but they managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal.

The problem that the EU has recognized but the US won't. That if all companies are forced to be fair within a tax system, then you don't get the multinationals essentially going to where they can pay zero tax and then claim it's "creating jobs" when it's not, it's moving jobs around.

"......managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal". Now, continue the alternative, if no part in the United States is willing to give them "the deal", what would be the net impact to the US? Answer: negative job creation......also called "jobs lost". Which scenario do you think Americans prefer?

So you end up with corporations paying 10% of taxes while back in the 50's they paid 35%. Great job, bought off fascist New BS GOP and you silly dupes...

 

[francoHFW]

Bill Clinton promised a MIDDLE CLASS TAX CUT

Bill Clinton LIED


That's the evidence we have on Hillary's "promises"

This time it's so obviously needed it's ridiculous. Hillary is more liberal than Bill and has Sanders voters pushing her, and hopefully moderate GOPers ready to bolt. I say give her a chance, Trump is just Reaganism on steroids.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas might be "creating jobs" as you put it, but taking jobs away from other places. The jobs already existed in the US, the company wanted to have these jobs in the US but they managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal.

The problem that the EU has recognized but the US won't. That if all companies are forced to be fair within a tax system, then you don't get the multinationals essentially going to where they can pay zero tax and then claim it's "creating jobs" when it's not, it's moving jobs around.

"......managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal". Now, continue the alternative, if no part in the United States is willing to give them "the deal", what would be the net impact to the US? Answer: negative job creation......also called "jobs lost". Which scenario do you think Americans prefer?

So you end up with corporations paying 10% of taxes while back in the 50's they paid 35%. Great job, bought off fascist New BS GOP and you silly dupes...

The US was a creditor, not a debtor, nation back then. Big difference and not as simple as throwing out comparative

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas goes up and down like Venezuela according to oil prices.

Some people like to know what's going on in the real world.

Talk about the real world......you mean like real-world Detroit? You mock Texas for going up and down. When was the last time Detroit, Milwaukee, Toledo, Cleveland were UP? Especially Detroit and Milwaukee......Democrat controlled for a Century and running and what do Democrat policies have to show for it? Let's watch with amusement as Franco pulls out his tired and tried dupe-card or blame all of those rust-belt Republicans for "obstruction". Democrat policies have and continue to fail. It's time for change. To quote Obama, "we tried that and it didn't work".

Don't forget Buffalo, now having a renaissance thanks to Dem STATE gov't. Blaming Dem city gov't in Reaganist America is a joke for dupes ONLY.

It's not rust belt Republicans you IDIOT, it's the national ones. See sig pp1. Change the channel, dupe.

Hey smart ass, why don't you ask the obvious question as to what Buffalo is doing different than Detroit? Answer: Corrupt Detroit is still living in the '60s and believe they can squeeze corporations and the people.

 

[LaDexter]

I say give her a chance

Giving Hillary a "chance" is another "chance" for Madeleine Albright to do this again...


Gen. Hugh Shelton: Clinton Official Suggested Letting U.S. Plane Be Shot Down To Provoke War With Iraq


" (Gen Hugh) Shelton sets the scene at a “small, weekly White House breakfast” that served as regular “informal” meetings that “encouraged brainstorming of potential options on a variety of issues.”

At one of my very first breakfasts, while Berger and Cohen were engaged in a sidebar discussion down at one end of the table and Tenet and Richardson were preoccupied in another, one of the Cabinet members present leaned over to me and said, “Hugh, I know I shouldn’t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event — something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough — and slow enough — so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?"

Who asked him that???

Hillary's #1 supporter, the one who says "there is a cold place in hell for women who don't vote Hillary!!!"

" If you eliminate Berger, Cohen, Tenet, and Richardson and look at the Cabinet members that remain, you’re sort of left where Elliott is: with Madeleine Albright."

 

[Vigilante]

Trump tax plan has 0% tax for married that make up to $50K.... And Cunton tax plan?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Maybe they will. But then again it'll be fairer than some companies, the rich ones, being able to sell goods cheaper than the smaller firms because they've bribed their way through the system, wouldn't you say?

Republicans claim to be for business, but appear to only be for big business.

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas might be "creating jobs" as you put it, but taking jobs away from other places. The jobs already existed in the US, the company wanted to have these jobs in the US but they managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal.

The problem that the EU has recognized but the US won't. That if all companies are forced to be fair within a tax system, then you don't get the multinationals essentially going to where they can pay zero tax and then claim it's "creating jobs" when it's not, it's moving jobs around.

"......managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal". Now, continue the alternative, if no part in the United States is willing to give them "the deal", what would be the net impact to the US? Answer: negative job creation......also called "jobs lost". Which scenario do you think Americans prefer?

Not at all.

People still want to create jobs, there's still a market out there. Now, maybe the large corporation isn't willing to risk doing business, but a smaller company will be willing. The jobs will still be created. We're not talking about taxes that are too high here. We're talking about a multi-national large corporation not being given an unfair advantage in the market. If anything smaller companies should be given the unfair advantage, so they can grow to a position where they then have to then pay more taxes. Bigger companies are more likely to go stale, so they try these tricks of paying less taxes in order to make them more competitive. Smaller companies are more likely to be more creative, more attuned to the needs of the customer, less full of crap etc.

I'm wondering why you're so pro-multi-nationals.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Try again, Democrats are for big bussiness...IE GE

Republicans are for the 90% plus mall bussiness in America

Care to actually back up what you say? Seeing as Republican policies are for giving huge corporations very low taxes.

10 Big Corporate Tax Breaks, and Who Benefits

You're telling me that the Republicans don't do any of these?

Last I looked Texas was mostly Republican. 20 Republicans to 11 Democrats in the Senate, 99 Republicans to 48 Democrats in the House.

And yet:

Report: Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses

"
Texas gave away billions in tax breaks to businesses"

"Business tax breaks cost Texas $4.3 billion in the last state budget, a figure that amounts to about a third of the state's massive revenue shortfall"

"One of the largest carve-outs was for the natural gas tax, which totaled about $1 billion a year in exemptions"

Is Texas busting their state budget or are they actually creating jobs better than anyone else in the US?

Unless you are in Texas, why should you be concerned?

Texas might be "creating jobs" as you put it, but taking jobs away from other places. The jobs already existed in the US, the company wanted to have these jobs in the US but they managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal.

The problem that the EU has recognized but the US won't. That if all companies are forced to be fair within a tax system, then you don't get the multinationals essentially going to where they can pay zero tax and then claim it's "creating jobs" when it's not, it's moving jobs around.

"......managed to move to one part that was willing to give them the deal". Now, continue the alternative, if no part in the United States is willing to give them "the deal", what would be the net impact to the US? Answer: negative job creation......also called "jobs lost". Which scenario do you think Americans prefer?

Not at all.

People still want to create jobs, there's still a market out there. Now, maybe the large corporation isn't willing to risk doing business, but a smaller company will be willing. The jobs will still be created. We're not talking about taxes that are too high here. We're talking about a multi-national large corporation not being given an unfair advantage in the market. If anything smaller companies should be given the unfair advantage, so they can grow to a position where they then have to then pay more taxes. Bigger companies are more likely to go stale, so they try these tricks of paying less taxes in order to make them more competitive. Smaller companies are more likely to be more creative, more attuned to the needs of the customer, less full of crap etc.

I'm wondering why you're so pro-multi-nationals.

Quite the contrary.....I am all about the small business and leveling the playing field against multinational companies. Over regulation and higher taxes naturally forces a company to find the best deal so they can compete.

 

[OnePercenter]

The top two financial issues facing the middle class and poor today are wages and the economy. Please post Trumps plan that answers both. Good luck!

Damn dude. He has already outlined how he is going to knock off the hazardous trade deals and his plans to bring US companies back home.
Pull your nose out of hillary's panties and join the real world.

A plan entails on how your going to accomplish something. All that Trump has listed are some pie-in-the-sky bloviating.

As opposed to Obama/Clinton and demonizing the high income earners is going to put more money back into the pockets of the Middle Class? We've witnessed over the last 8 years that that is a shell game. Mantras of "fair share" and redistribution actually saw the take home pay of Middle Class decline. Further, the Middle Class was told their healthcare costs would be lowered by an average of $2,500.

It's easy for you to trash Trump. You should be taking a critical eye to what Clinton will be doing differently.

I had an income of $4.5M last year and paid zero in personal income taxes. I am the demon.

Ask Republicans why they voted against every minimum wage increase for eight years.

I don't trash Trump. I call a sham a sham.

You made that much money and your a semi regular on USMB?

I call it a lie..

You can call it anything you want, but you can't refute anything I post.