Where The Heck Did All These Leftists Come From??

Where The Heck Did All These Leftists Come From??

Originally, from England and Europe.

If it had been left to the mealy mouthed control freaks rw's, we'd all be speaking with a British accent.
 
Where The Heck Did All These Leftists Come From??

Originally, from England and Europe.

If it had been left to the mealy mouthed control freaks rw's, we'd all be speaking with a British accent.

Judging the import of your post, your knowledge is at a nadir.

Luckily for you, the only place to go is up.

You've actually described folks who refused to be governed, and who supported religious liberty as 'Leftists'?

Dunce.

No wonder no one ever copied off your paper.

Remedial to follow:

On March 22, 1775, Edmund Burke took the floor of the British Parliament, and explained why his country should seek reconciliation with the Americans, asserting that the colonists derived their ideas about freedom and resistance from their Protestant Christianity. They were Protestants “of that kind which is most adverse to all implicit submission of mind and opinion,” and their dissent from the Anglican Church not only favored liberty, it was “built upon it.”
Edmund Burke, “The Speech of Edmund Burke, Esq,; On Moving Is Resolution for Conciliation with the Colonies,” p.15-17.


You must be a squirrel’s version of heaven.
 
1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing!

Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas.
Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.
Prager, “Still The Best Hope,” chapter two.



2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.




3. Now, while the indoctrination by universities is thorough and complete…it is not permanent. This is the meaning of 'If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you are not Conservative by 40, you have no brain'.

Therefore, what is required to maintain the miasma, the haze of Liberalism, is the media.

The media is the wall against which most folks bounce their search for “Truth.” In the Golden Days of Liberal control of the media, there was the Cronkite-Chancellor-Reasoner Cartel. In this top-down system for determining the Truth, it was handed out by a very few networks…and a handful of national newspapers. Cronkite went so far as to end any debate, each night with” “And that’s the way it is.”

a. Cronkite was a big believer in the powers of centralization, that the smartest people could get into a room and solve all the world’s problems.

b. Cronkite: “It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order
Remarks on Accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award - World Beyond Borders

c. Frank Zappa saw this top-down journalistic ‘Truth’ for what it was: “They walk in the door seeking a method by which they can reinforce conclusions they've already arrived at. “Zappa Family regains control of Frank's Catalog!! - Furthur Community Forum




4. Why so many in the profession lean Left? “The radicals [of the 60's] were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51



But the spell is wearing off....fewer watch the nightly news, and fewer yet the newspapers.

5. In 1987 a group of conservative news junkies started the ‘Media Research Center.’ The same year, the Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine. A year later, Rush Limbaugh began his wildly successful radio show. And in 1996, Matt Drudge appeared.



The internet: the final battleground.

Wow. A liberal arts education is, essentially, a brainwash. Thanks so much for your insight; knowing all those courses, in all those departments had only one purpose - to create a liberal.

From the Golden Age of Greece to the Gilded Age and beyond all those authors - philosophers, poets, historians, novelists and chroniclers had one and only one agenda.

I suggest PC you need a course in trolling; a successful troll is credible, not comical.

I am not sure what the purpose of a liberal arts education is. It certainly is not to prepare the student for any sort of meaningful career. Maybe the purpose of those courses is to create OWSers.
 
Where The Heck Did All These Leftists Come From??


McGruff the Crime-Dog has found a clue:





4e47db50459687e1433273f6c1ed.jpg



:eusa_whistle:
 
1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing!

Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas.
Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.
Prager, “Still The Best Hope,” chapter two.



2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.




3. Now, while the indoctrination by universities is thorough and complete…it is not permanent. This is the meaning of 'If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you are not Conservative by 40, you have no brain'.

Therefore, what is required to maintain the miasma, the haze of Liberalism, is the media.

The media is the wall against which most folks bounce their search for “Truth.” In the Golden Days of Liberal control of the media, there was the Cronkite-Chancellor-Reasoner Cartel. In this top-down system for determining the Truth, it was handed out by a very few networks…and a handful of national newspapers. Cronkite went so far as to end any debate, each night with” “And that’s the way it is.”

a. Cronkite was a big believer in the powers of centralization, that the smartest people could get into a room and solve all the world’s problems.

b. Cronkite: “It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order
Remarks on Accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award - World Beyond Borders

c. Frank Zappa saw this top-down journalistic ‘Truth’ for what it was: “They walk in the door seeking a method by which they can reinforce conclusions they've already arrived at. “Zappa Family regains control of Frank's Catalog!! - Furthur Community Forum




4. Why so many in the profession lean Left? “The radicals [of the 60's] were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51



But the spell is wearing off....fewer watch the nightly news, and fewer yet the newspapers.

5. In 1987 a group of conservative news junkies started the ‘Media Research Center.’ The same year, the Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine. A year later, Rush Limbaugh began his wildly successful radio show. And in 1996, Matt Drudge appeared.



The internet: the final battleground.

We rule the world. America is falling in line. You white conservatives are fighting a battle in a way you have already lost.
 
1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing!

Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas.
Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.
Prager, “Still The Best Hope,” chapter two.



2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.




3. Now, while the indoctrination by universities is thorough and complete…it is not permanent. This is the meaning of 'If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you are not Conservative by 40, you have no brain'.

Therefore, what is required to maintain the miasma, the haze of Liberalism, is the media.

The media is the wall against which most folks bounce their search for “Truth.” In the Golden Days of Liberal control of the media, there was the Cronkite-Chancellor-Reasoner Cartel. In this top-down system for determining the Truth, it was handed out by a very few networks…and a handful of national newspapers. Cronkite went so far as to end any debate, each night with” “And that’s the way it is.”

a. Cronkite was a big believer in the powers of centralization, that the smartest people could get into a room and solve all the world’s problems.

b. Cronkite: “It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order.”
Remarks on Accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award - World Beyond Borders

c. Frank Zappa saw this top-down journalistic ‘Truth’ for what it was: “They walk in the door seeking a method by which they can reinforce conclusions they've already arrived at. “Zappa Family regains control of Frank's Catalog!! - Furthur Community Forum




4. Why so many in the profession lean Left? “The radicals [of the 60's] were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51



But the spell is wearing off....fewer watch the nightly news, and fewer yet the newspapers.

5. In 1987 a group of conservative news junkies started the ‘Media Research Center.’ The same year, the Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine. A year later, Rush Limbaugh began his wildly successful radio show. And in 1996, Matt Drudge appeared.



The internet: the final battleground.

We rule the world. America is falling in line. You white conservatives are fighting a battle in a way you have already lost.

Now, faulty....

...the use of factual information would do wonders for your reputation and status...

Let me help:

"Conservatives continue to make up the largest segment of political views in the country, outnumbering liberals nearly two-to-one, according to a new poll Thursday.
The Gallup survey found that 40 percent of Americans consider themselves conservative; 35 percent consider themselves moderate; and 21 percent see themselves as liberal. The figures did not change from 2010."


Read more: Gallup poll: Conservatives outnumber liberals - Tim Mak - POLITICO.com



Maybe this will make you feel better....



 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Leftism is so pervasive, that if applied to any other way of looking at life, it would be widely recognized as a form of brainwashing!

Image a person who attended only fundamental Christian schools from preschool through graduate school, who never saw a secular, let alone anti-Christian, film, and who only read religious books. Most would say that they had been ‘brainwashed.” Yet, we regularly find individuals who only attended secular liberal schools from preschool through college, watched or listened to only Left-of-center television, movies, music, and had essentially no exposure to religious or conservative ideas.
Brainwashed?

Of course not! Liberals are open-minded!!! The irony here is that the denial itself shows how very effective the brainwashing has been.

Now, Christians or Jews who have rarely been exposed to secular ideas and values would readily acknowledge same. It is only those on the Left who fool themselves into believing that they have been exposed to all points of view.
Prager, “Still The Best Hope,” chapter two.



2. Universities have become to Liberalism what a Christian seminary is to Christianity. The difference is that Christian seminaries acknowledge their purpose, to produce committed Christians.

a. “The purpose of a university should be to make a son as unlike his father as possible.” The University's Part in Political Life” (13 March 1909) in PWW (The Papers of Woodrow Wilson) 19:99.




3. Now, while the indoctrination by universities is thorough and complete…it is not permanent. This is the meaning of 'If you are not a liberal at 20, you have no heart. If you are not Conservative by 40, you have no brain'.

Therefore, what is required to maintain the miasma, the haze of Liberalism, is the media.

The media is the wall against which most folks bounce their search for “Truth.” In the Golden Days of Liberal control of the media, there was the Cronkite-Chancellor-Reasoner Cartel. In this top-down system for determining the Truth, it was handed out by a very few networks…and a handful of national newspapers. Cronkite went so far as to end any debate, each night with” “And that’s the way it is.”

a. Cronkite was a big believer in the powers of centralization, that the smartest people could get into a room and solve all the world’s problems.

b. Cronkite: “It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace. To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order
Remarks on Accepting the 1999 Norman Cousins Global Governance Award - World Beyond Borders

c. Frank Zappa saw this top-down journalistic ‘Truth’ for what it was: “They walk in the door seeking a method by which they can reinforce conclusions they've already arrived at. “Zappa Family regains control of Frank's Catalog!! - Furthur Community Forum




4. Why so many in the profession lean Left? “The radicals [of the 60's] were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.”
Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51



But the spell is wearing off....fewer watch the nightly news, and fewer yet the newspapers.

5. In 1987 a group of conservative news junkies started the ‘Media Research Center.’ The same year, the Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine. A year later, Rush Limbaugh began his wildly successful radio show. And in 1996, Matt Drudge appeared.



The internet: the final battleground.

Wow. A liberal arts education is, essentially, a brainwash. Thanks so much for your insight; knowing all those courses, in all those departments had only one purpose - to create a liberal.

From the Golden Age of Greece to the Gilded Age and beyond all those authors - philosophers, poets, historians, novelists and chroniclers had one and only one agenda.

I suggest PC you need a course in trolling; a successful troll is credible, not comical.

I am not sure what the purpose of a liberal arts education is. It certainly is not to prepare the student for any sort of meaningful career. Maybe the purpose of those courses is to create OWSers.

Posted by a true ignorant. The one question remaining, is your ignorance a product of birth or is it willful?
 
this chick is just fucking brain washed.


she says Americans are NOT GOOD.

she is a christain zealot who has her whole world tied up in these hate spews.

But the remarkable characteristic of it all is that none of comes from her own mind; it's all someone else doing the thinking for her.

She reminds me a lot of Hannity.
 
A surplus is cash inflow less cash outflow. Cash inflow that exceeds cash outflow is a surplus. Cash outflow that exceeds cash inflow is a deficit. Full stop. That's it. The total national debt may go up or down if there is a surplus or a deficit. Total national debt includes total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public plus total debt the government owes to itself through the trusts. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public will rise when there is a deficit. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public will fall when there is a surplus. The fiscal balance does not include changes to debt the government owes itself through the trusts. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public fell during the 1990s. This is evidence of a surplus since excess cash generated by the surplus was used to retire Treasury debt. Please refer to my prior links to explain further how this works.

This is why Republicans, conservatives, economists and accountants familiar with government accounting don't make the argument that there wasn't a surplus. Please refer to my links to the conservatives and Republicans who referenced the surpluses above. It's why Newt Gingrich repeatedly got up on stage during the primaries and said he was responsible for the surpluses, for which he certainly gets a big chunk of credit.

I read the links when you suggested same. What they prove is that there are easy to find big government Republicans, as well as Democrats.

The alternatives are not presented by Republicans and Democrats....

...but rather by Liberals and Conservatives.


As you acknowledge, under Bill Clinton, the national debt rose 41%.

I have no interest in using a modified meaning of the word 'surplus.'

While I am not disputing a question of economics, I am disputing that you have a firm grip on the bigger question, one based in politics.


While it is possible to deal with, and even obliterate the debt,- as you know, it was done once- our current iteration of politicians have no interest in this struggle.

No, there was a budget surplus. The budget of the federal government was balanced.

There's a reason the term 'off-budget' exists. See if you can find someone to explain to you that reason.
 
I am not sure what the purpose of a liberal arts education is. It certainly is not to prepare the student for any sort of meaningful career. Maybe the purpose of those courses is to create OWSers.

The graduate with a Science degree asks, "Why does it work?"

The graduate with an Engineering degree asks, "How does it work?"

The graduate with an Accounting degree asks, "How much will it cost?"

The graduate with a Liberal Arts degree asks, "Do you want fries with that?"
 
A surplus is cash inflow less cash outflow. Cash inflow that exceeds cash outflow is a surplus. Cash outflow that exceeds cash inflow is a deficit. Full stop. That's it. The total national debt may go up or down if there is a surplus or a deficit. Total national debt includes total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public plus total debt the government owes to itself through the trusts. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public will rise when there is a deficit. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public will fall when there is a surplus. The fiscal balance does not include changes to debt the government owes itself through the trusts. Total outstanding debt issued by the Treasury to the public fell during the 1990s. This is evidence of a surplus since excess cash generated by the surplus was used to retire Treasury debt. Please refer to my prior links to explain further how this works.

This is why Republicans, conservatives, economists and accountants familiar with government accounting don't make the argument that there wasn't a surplus. Please refer to my links to the conservatives and Republicans who referenced the surpluses above. It's why Newt Gingrich repeatedly got up on stage during the primaries and said he was responsible for the surpluses, for which he certainly gets a big chunk of credit.

I read the links when you suggested same. What they prove is that there are easy to find big government Republicans, as well as Democrats.

The alternatives are not presented by Republicans and Democrats....

...but rather by Liberals and Conservatives.


As you acknowledge, under Bill Clinton, the national debt rose 41%.

I have no interest in using a modified meaning of the word 'surplus.'

While I am not disputing a question of economics, I am disputing that you have a firm grip on the bigger question, one based in politics.


While it is possible to deal with, and even obliterate the debt,- as you know, it was done once- our current iteration of politicians have no interest in this struggle.

No, there was a budget surplus. The budget of the federal government was balanced.

There's a reason the term 'off-budget' exists. See if you can find someone to explain to you that reason.

National Debt.
1993 4,351,044
1994 4,643,307
1995 4,920,586
1996 5,181,465
1997 5,369,206
1998 5,478,189
1999 5,605,523
2000 5,628,700

Historical Tables | The White House (table 7.1)
The table 7.1 will also show that he inherited a $4 trillion debt.
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding - Annual 1950 - 1999



See if you can find someone to do the math for you.
 
Where The Heck Did All These Leftists Come From??

Their parents had sex.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top