Where is the Liberal compassion for the 120 murdered in Baltimore in 2015?

The Liberal elite prefer that poor uneducated minorities be corralled in inner city ghettos, far away from their gated communities. It's much easier to feed them Dem propaganda and herd them to polling places with the cheat sheets for voting the Dem ticket.
What are Republicans doing for those people?


Pathetic deflection. Their condition is due to what the Dems do for them.

But if you want a response: Lincoln was a Repuglican..The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed because of GOP support in the Senate. Then along came LBJ to destroy the black family with the Great Society...the result being generations of feral, uneducated, violent youth.
Far from a deflection.....it is an assessment of the failures of Republicans to do a thing for those in the inner city

They giggle and point out that people are still poor in spite of Democrats trying to help them....yet, Republicans have done nothing for our inner cities outside of building more prisons

Locking up the killers and thugs and robbers that prey upon them is a good thing.

It is telling that you don't consider it such.

Also decades of support for Civil Rights and AA.
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.
 
There is no liberal compassion for blacks who die at the hands of other blacks. Criminal thugs killing other criminal thugs and innocent bystanders simply doesn't compute in small lefty brains unless a black police officer happens to be involved. To them a black person employed as a cop is an extreme act of "acting white," so they're obviously fair game for the mobs' outrage.

Again...

Nobody condones murder
But as a society, we accept the results when a murder is committed and the perpetrator receives justice
Public outrage like we saw in Baltimore is a result of when people see a murder and perceive that those responsible will get off without punishment
 
What are Republicans doing for those people?


Pathetic deflection. Their condition is due to what the Dems do for them.

But if you want a response: Lincoln was a Repuglican..The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed because of GOP support in the Senate. Then along came LBJ to destroy the black family with the Great Society...the result being generations of feral, uneducated, violent youth.
Far from a deflection.....it is an assessment of the failures of Republicans to do a thing for those in the inner city

They giggle and point out that people are still poor in spite of Democrats trying to help them....yet, Republicans have done nothing for our inner cities outside of building more prisons

Locking up the killers and thugs and robbers that prey upon them is a good thing.

It is telling that you don't consider it such.

Also decades of support for Civil Rights and AA.
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted
 
"Where is the Liberal compassion for the 120 murdered in Baltimore in 2015?"

This fails as a straw man fallacy.

I don't see how.


"Black Lives Matter". That is not a ridiculous position being put on libs by cons.

THat is their campaign.


Pointing out that some black lives don't seem to matter to them is valid.
That's because you're ignorant as to what a straw man fallacy is.

A straw man fallacy is where one attempts to misrepresent his opponent’s position by contriving a lie about that position, in this case the lies that Baltimore is “collapsing into anarchy,” that “liberals campaign against the police,” and that 'liberals' “lack compassion” for those killed in Baltimore – again, all lies.

Because the OP's 'argument' is predicated solely on lies about 'liberals,' it fails as a consequence.

And your post also fails as a fallacy because it's predicated on the OP's lies.
You should listen to him Correll.....This is a guy who has made his entire USMB career around the strawmen fallacies he creates regarding Republicans. You could even say that he would be considered an 'expert' on straw men arguments.
 
Pathetic deflection. Their condition is due to what the Dems do for them.

But if you want a response: Lincoln was a Repuglican..The Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed because of GOP support in the Senate. Then along came LBJ to destroy the black family with the Great Society...the result being generations of feral, uneducated, violent youth.
Far from a deflection.....it is an assessment of the failures of Republicans to do a thing for those in the inner city

They giggle and point out that people are still poor in spite of Democrats trying to help them....yet, Republicans have done nothing for our inner cities outside of building more prisons

Locking up the killers and thugs and robbers that prey upon them is a good thing.

It is telling that you don't consider it such.

Also decades of support for Civil Rights and AA.
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.
 
Far from a deflection.....it is an assessment of the failures of Republicans to do a thing for those in the inner city

They giggle and point out that people are still poor in spite of Democrats trying to help them....yet, Republicans have done nothing for our inner cities outside of building more prisons

Locking up the killers and thugs and robbers that prey upon them is a good thing.

It is telling that you don't consider it such.

Also decades of support for Civil Rights and AA.
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.

We also ended a lot of poverty

But like wars...it tends to keep creeping back. Doesn't mean we should stop fighting it
 
There is no liberal compassion for blacks who die at the hands of other blacks. Criminal thugs killing other criminal thugs and innocent bystanders simply doesn't compute in small lefty brains unless a black police officer happens to be involved. To them a black person employed as a cop is an extreme act of "acting white," so they're obviously fair game for the mobs' outrage.

Again...

Nobody condones murder
But as a society, we accept the results when a murder is committed and the perpetrator receives justice
Public outrage like we saw in Baltimore is a result of when people see a murder and perceive that those responsible will get off without punishment
Then where the hell are all the marches, rallies, speeches, etc. against the open warfare of blacks killing one another daily? Race pimps and other victimhood idiots like you condone murder everyday with your selective brand of outrage 100% dependent on either the color of one's skin or their occupation if they happen to be a black cop.

Go spout you tripe to your fellow leftist fools.
 
There is no liberal compassion for blacks who die at the hands of other blacks. Criminal thugs killing other criminal thugs and innocent bystanders simply doesn't compute in small lefty brains unless a black police officer happens to be involved. To them a black person employed as a cop is an extreme act of "acting white," so they're obviously fair game for the mobs' outrage.

Again...

Nobody condones murder
But as a society, we accept the results when a murder is committed and the perpetrator receives justice
Public outrage like we saw in Baltimore is a result of when people see a murder and perceive that those responsible will get off without punishment
Then where the hell are all the marches, rallies, speeches, etc. against the open warfare of blacks killing one another daily? Race pimps and other victimhood idiots like you condone murder everyday with your selective brand of outrage 100% dependent on either the color of one's skin or their occupation if they happen to be a black cop.

Go spout you tripe to your fellow leftist fools.

Have difficulty reading?

The marches are not because a black man was killed
The marches were held because it was percieved that the police responsible for his death would get off scott free
 
Locking up the killers and thugs and robbers that prey upon them is a good thing.

It is telling that you don't consider it such.

Also decades of support for Civil Rights and AA.
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.

We also ended a lot of poverty

But like wars...it tends to keep creeping back. Doesn't mean we should stop fighting it

Poverty has never ended, it got worse.
 
Lock them up is the conservative solution to almost every problem faced by the inner city. So much that we lead the world in incarceration

Conservatives are unwilling to spring for schools, medical care or infrastructure in those neighborhoods
They have no problem springing for another prison

Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.

We also ended a lot of poverty

But like wars...it tends to keep creeping back. Doesn't mean we should stop fighting it

Poverty has never ended, it got worse.

How is war doing?
 
Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.

We also ended a lot of poverty

But like wars...it tends to keep creeping back. Doesn't mean we should stop fighting it

Poverty has never ended, it got worse.

How is war doing?

Pretty good. We avoided WWIII for example.

That's a big one.
 
Throwing money at the problem never fixes the problem. 16 trillion spent on poverty over the course of forty some odd years and we have more people in poverty than ever before. We don't have a school shortage, what you have is a shortage of people willing to do what it takes to attend and to learn.

And yet we spent over $16 trillion on the military and we still haven't ended wars
Doesn't mean the money was wasted

You are an idiot.

We ended a lot of wars, but you aren't honest enough to admit it.

We also ended a lot of poverty

But like wars...it tends to keep creeping back. Doesn't mean we should stop fighting it

Poverty has never ended, it got worse.

How is war doing?

What is your definition of war?
 

Forum List

Back
Top