Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
After al the evidence I have posted the only way to answer your talking points is to quote the Proverbs
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge
Translation - do not watse your time arguing with an idiot
I found it funny to watch Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both stand behind pulpits at churches in Selma, Alabama on Sunday as they pandered for support for their presidential campaigns.
Where is the outrage from the ACLU and Barry Lynn fromt he left wing group Americans for Seperation of Church and State? I believe it is fine to them for liberal candidates to mix Religion and politics but not conservative ones.
I found it weird that Edwards is talking for Jesus. Last I heard, the message was to the individual, not government:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/05/politics/p135336S12.DTL&type=politics
Oh heck, but that would make them be consistent for once, an area foreign to them, they do NOT want to go there.
How does a candidate for civil office violate Separation of Church and State, or the principle of no human authority over the duty which we owe our Creator, by merely speaking to a Church?
Did the two candidates give the congregation advice on when, where or what to pray? Did the candidates advise the congregation to obey the commandments to make no idols and bow down to them or remember the Sabbath and keep it holy? Where is the assumption of civil authority over sacred matters?
Fred,
Really, are we suppose to believe that you haven't heard the crying and whinning from the left on the so called religious right.
The left is and always has been anti Christian and unless you are mentally challenged you know this.
I too have heard and read the outrage of the left whenever anything having to do with Christianity is mention by conservative politicians.
It is with amazing speed that the ridiculous "Separation of Church and State" lie is brought out and splashed across newspaper headlines.
I have heard the Counterfeit Christians of the Religious Right spewing the lie that Separation of Church and State is myth. Is that what you are talking about?
You have that exactly backwards. The right has always despised the Lord's just and truly Christian Commandment no to entangle the things that are God's with those of Caesar.
Post some examples of left wing elected civil officers expressing outrage at conservative politicians who mentioned Christianity. Then we can chat about it.
I see you are one of those "Bogus Christians/Demon Adorers” who loathes the Lord Jesus Christ's admonition to, "“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.” I shall pray for you.
I found it weird that Edwards is talking for Jesus. Last I heard, the message was to the individual, not government:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/05/politics/p135336S12.DTL&type=politics
Show me this "Separation of Church and State" in the Constitution.
In 1788, the Constitution of the United States was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves and their posterity. They have declared it the supreme law of the land. They have made it a limited government. They have defined its authority. They have restrained it to the exercise of certain powers. They granted it no authority over their religion. As James Madison so famously spoke, at the Virginia Ratifying Convention, in response to Patrick Henry's charge that "Religion is not guarded--there is no bill of rights declaring that religion should be secure",
"There is not a shadow of right in the general government to intermeddle with religion. Its least interference with it, would be a most flagrant usurpation."
In his famous "Commentaries on the Constitution", published in 1833, the great U. S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wrote that,
"The clause which declares that, "no religious test shall ever be required, as a qualification to any office or public trust, under the United States"...cut off for ever every pretence of any alliance between church and state in the national government."
U.S. Constitution: First Amendment
First Amendment - Religion and Expression
Amendment Text | Annotations
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Don't you hope that our government acts upon the collective will of the people? And shouldn't a Christian be concerned that government is not acting in ways that promote social justice?
to liberals, government is God
wrong. I am fully capable of discerning the difference between Church and State.
It is you who seems to have the problem.
as long as it is libs preaching liberalism from the pulpit you will never have a problem with politicans campaigning in a Church
I doin't have a problem with any politician speaking from the pulpit of a church. I only have a problem when the church speaks through the organs of the state.
How does a candidate for civil office violate Separation of Church and State, or the principle of no human authority over the duty which we owe our Creator, by merely speaking to a Church?
Did the two candidates give the congregation advice on when, where or what to pray? Did the candidates advise the congregation to obey the commandments to make no idols and bow down to them or remember the Sabbath and keep it holy? Where is the assumption of civil authority over sacred matters?
I have heard the Counterfeit Christians of the Religious Right spewing the lie that Separation of Church and State is myth. Is that what you are talking about?
You have that exactly backwards. The right has always despised the Lord's just and truly Christian Commandment no to entangle the things that are God's with those of Caesar.
Post some examples of left wing elected civil officers expressing outrage at conservative politicians who mentioned Christianity. Then we can chat about it.
I see you are one of those "Bogus Christians/Demon Adorers who loathes the Lord Jesus Christ's admonition to, "Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesars, and unto God the things that are Gods. I shall pray for you.
Don't you hope that our government acts upon the collective will of the people?
In 1788, the Constitution of the United States was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves and their posterity. They have declared it the supreme law of the land. They have made it a limited government. They have defined its authority. They have restrained it to the exercise of certain powers. They granted it no authority over their religion. As James Madison so famously spoke, at the Virginia Ratifying Convention, in response to Patrick Henry's charge that "Religion is not guarded--there is no bill of rights declaring that religion should be secure",
"There is not a shadow of right in the general government to intermeddle with religion. Its least interference with it, would be a most flagrant usurpation."
In his famous "Commentaries on the Constitution", published in 1833, the great U. S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wrote that,
"The clause which declares that, "no religious test shall ever be required, as a qualification to any office or public trust, under the United States"...cut off for ever every pretence of any alliance between church and state in the national government."
You mean like banning same gender marriage?
And not leaving the border so wide open and giving amnesty to illegals.
The list of judicial activism that liberals have used is extremely long.
