Where is President Obama getting his re-election funds?

[Luddly Neddite]

Barack Obama Reelection Raising More From Small Donors Than In 2008

"A month ago, 40% of independen*ts said they would back Obama over Romney — today 51% say they would, while the number expressing support for Romney has slipped from 50% to 42%."

"Over the course of the campaign, Romney’s image among independen*t voters has suffered substantia*lly. Most notably, the number who believe he is honest and trustworth*y has fallen from 53% to 41%, while the number who say he is not has risen from 32% to 45%."

http://www*.washingto*npost.com/*bl...contin*ues/2012/0*2/13/gIQAY*YqGBR_blog*.html

The results also show Obama besting "Mitt" 52-44, a little better than he did in 2008.

http://www*.people-pr*ess.org/20*12/02/13/s*antorum-ca*tches-romn*ey-in-gop-*race

 

[Conservative]

Barack Obama Reelection Raising More From Small Donors Than In 2008

"A month ago, 40% of independen*ts said they would back Obama over Romney — today 51% say they would, while the number expressing support for Romney has slipped from 50% to 42%."

"Over the course of the campaign, Romney’s image among independen*t voters has suffered substantia*lly. Most notably, the number who believe he is honest and trustworth*y has fallen from 53% to 41%, while the number who say he is not has risen from 32% to 45%."

http://www*.washingto*npost.com/*bl...contin*ues/2012/0*2/13/gIQAY*YqGBR_blog*.html

The results also show Obama besting "Mitt" 52-44, a little better than he did in 2008.

http://www*.people-pr*ess.org/20*12/02/13/s*antorum-ca*tches-romn*ey-in-gop-*race

your 2nd and 3rd links are garbage.... don't work... care to try again?

 

[del]

wall street mostly

 

[Conservative]

as for you first link and comment...

According to an analysis by The Huffington Post...

kills your credibility right there, Sparky.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Don't know why the * are inserted into the links. Here they are again -

Romney’s slide among independents continues - The Plum Line - The Washington Post

Santorum Catches Romney in GOP Race | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press

There are also many more links via a Google search.

Read 'em and weep.

 

[The T]

as for you first link and comment...

According to an analysis by The Huffington Post...

kills your credibility right there, Sparky.

HuffPoo analysis...

 

[AmericanFirst]

Barack Obama Reelection Raising More From Small Donors Than In 2008

"A month ago, 40% of independen*ts said they would back Obama over Romney — today 51% say they would, while the number expressing support for Romney has slipped from 50% to 42%."

"Over the course of the campaign, Romney’s image among independen*t voters has suffered substantia*lly. Most notably, the number who believe he is honest and trustworth*y has fallen from 53% to 41%, while the number who say he is not has risen from 32% to 45%."

http://www*.washingto*npost.com/*bl...contin*ues/2012/0*2/13/gIQAY*YqGBR_blog*.html

The results also show Obama besting "Mitt" 52-44, a little better than he did in 2008.

http://www*.people-pr*ess.org/20*12/02/13/s*antorum-ca*tches-romn*ey-in-gop-*race

Has he disclosed where he got the 300 million for his first campaign?

 

[HUGGY]

Where is President Obama getting his re-election funds?

The monitary sources of the super PACS interested in re-electing Obama is nobody's business...just like for the GOP candidates.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

wall street mostly

No Wall Street Journal, if that's what you mean.

The THREE sources are HuffPo, Pew and Washington Post. If those THREE sources don't suit you, there are many more where those came from. Sorry, but I doubt faux or blaze has the story.

Feel free to post links that counter the info in these THREE sources.

 

[The T]

Obama has to rely on 'PACS' seeing as he is falling short of the threatened $1BN warchest...

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Barack Obama Reelection Raising More From Small Donors Than In 2008

"A month ago, 40% of independen*ts said they would back Obama over Romney — today 51% say they would, while the number expressing support for Romney has slipped from 50% to 42%."

"Over the course of the campaign, Romney’s image among independen*t voters has suffered substantia*lly. Most notably, the number who believe he is honest and trustworth*y has fallen from 53% to 41%, while the number who say he is not has risen from 32% to 45%."

http://www*.washingto*npost.com/*bl...contin*ues/2012/0*2/13/gIQAY*YqGBR_blog*.html

The results also show Obama besting "Mitt" 52-44, a little better than he did in 2008.

http://www*.people-pr*ess.org/20*12/02/13/s*antorum-ca*tches-romn*ey-in-gop-*race

You can't possibly expect anyone to buy this drivel.

Top Contributors to Barack Obama | OpenSecrets

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Barack Obama Reelection Raising More From Small Donors Than In 2008

"A month ago, 40% of independen*ts said they would back Obama over Romney — today 51% say they would, while the number expressing support for Romney has slipped from 50% to 42%."

http://www*.washingto*npost.com/*bl...contin*ues/2012/0*2/13/gIQAY*YqGBR_blog*.html

The results also show Obama besting "Mitt" 52-44, a little better than he did in 2008.

http://www*.people-pr*ess.org/20*12/02/13/s*antorum-ca*tches-romn*ey-in-gop-*race

your 2nd and 3rd links are garbage.... don't work... care to try again?

That is because no one outside the mind of neddite has access to the www*.

*Not to be confused with reality, used by anyone with a brain, or cited by anyone but idiots.

 

[del]

wall street mostly

No Wall Street Journal, if that's what you mean.

The THREE sources are HuffPo, Pew and Washington Post. If those THREE sources don't suit you, there are many more where those came from. Sorry, but I doubt faux or blaze has the story.

Feel free to post links that counter the info in these THREE sources.

wow, you really are stupid

i meant wall st

y'know- banks, brokers, hedge fund managers

fucking idiot

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Where is President Obama getting his re-election funds?

The monitary sources of the super PACS interested in re-electing Obama is nobody's business...just like for the GOP candidates.

Not that I want to confuse you with facts, but Super PACs are required to disclose all donors, just like PACs and candidates.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

wall street mostly

No Wall Street Journal, if that's what you mean.

The THREE sources are HuffPo, Pew and Washington Post. If those THREE sources don't suit you, there are many more where those came from. Sorry, but I doubt faux or blaze has the story.

Feel free to post links that counter the info in these THREE sources.

wow, you really are stupid

i meant wall st

y'know- banks, brokers, hedge fund managers

fucking idiot

Actually, 'tis you who is short a few trillion brain cells. Read my post again. Pay especially close attention to the word

IF.

Can you see it now?

Good for you.

 

[del]

No Wall Street Journal, if that's what you mean.

The THREE sources are HuffPo, Pew and Washington Post. If those THREE sources don't suit you, there are many more where those came from. Sorry, but I doubt faux or blaze has the story.

Feel free to post links that counter the info in these THREE sources.

wow, you really are stupid

i meant wall st

y'know- banks, brokers, hedge fund managers

fucking idiot

Actually, 'tis you who is short a few trillion brain cells. Read my post again. Pay especially close attention to the word

IF.

Can you see it now?

Good for you.

i'll type slowly so your service animal can keep up.

you asked, or your handler asked-where is obama getting his re-election funds?

i answered-wall st

you replied with some blather about the wall st journal and 3 sources, and i accurately and succinctly pointed out that i meant wall st, as in the financial sector, which anyone with a room temperature IQ would have gotten the first time.

i then took time out of my busy, busy schedule to point out, again accurately and succinctly, that you are a fucking idiot.

you came back with even further proof that you are, indeed, a fucking idiot.

print this out and find a gibbon to read it to you.

have a pleasant evening

 

[California Girl]

wall street mostly

No Wall Street Journal, if that's what you mean.

The THREE sources are HuffPo, Pew and Washington Post. If those THREE sources don't suit you, there are many more where those came from. Sorry, but I doubt faux or blaze has the story.

Feel free to post links that counter the info in these THREE sources.

wow, you really are stupid

i meant wall st

y'know- banks, brokers, hedge fund managers

fucking idiot

In another thread, he just claimed that Mitt Romney is the head of the Mormon Church. I'd say you couldn't make this shit up.... but apparently, he can.