Where do you want to put The Wall?

The Wall should go on which side of the Rio Grande?

  • Mexico side = watch them dam it and then tear down the wall

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Neither works but ignore the treaty and geography and build anyway

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
We don't need a wall. I said that before. What We really need is people to stop legitimizing illegal immigrants and stop hiring them. Illegals are the new slave class. Empowering illegals is just enslavement, let's get real here.
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
 
We don't need a wall. I said that before. What We really need is people to stop legitimizing illegal immigrants and stop hiring them. Illegals are the new slave class. Empowering illegals is just enslavement, let's get real here.
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
 
We don't need a wall. I said that before. What We really need is people to stop legitimizing illegal immigrants and stop hiring them. Illegals are the new slave class. Empowering illegals is just enslavement, let's get real here.
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".


Pointing out that your cost benefit analysis conclusion is based on ignoring all the costs, is a very strong form of rebuttal.
 
We don't need a wall. I said that before. What We really need is people to stop legitimizing illegal immigrants and stop hiring them. Illegals are the new slave class. Empowering illegals is just enslavement, let's get real here.
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
 
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".


Pointing out that your cost benefit analysis conclusion is based on ignoring all the costs, is a very strong form of rebuttal.
This is why I don't take the right wing seriuosly about economics or their reading comprehension skills. Commerce well regulated means an end to our illegal problem via a market friendly visa. No more illegals, is what you don't seem to understand.
 
That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".


Pointing out that your cost benefit analysis conclusion is based on ignoring all the costs, is a very strong form of rebuttal.
This is why I don't take the right wing seriuosly about economics or their reading comprehension skills. Commerce well regulated means an end to our illegal problem via a market friendly visa. No more illegals, is what you don't seem to understand.
We have regulated commerce; we have no enforcement.
 
WE have a Commerce Clause; we need a market friendly visa.


That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
 
That is a lie of your based on A. your completely refusal to include the NEGATIVE effects of illegal immigration in your cost analysis, and B. your complete loyalty to Mexico and enmity to America.
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
 
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".


Pointing out that your cost benefit analysis conclusion is based on ignoring all the costs, is a very strong form of rebuttal.
This is why I don't take the right wing seriuosly about economics or their reading comprehension skills. Commerce well regulated means an end to our illegal problem via a market friendly visa. No more illegals, is what you don't seem to understand.
We have regulated commerce; we have no enforcement.
This is why I always argue the point with the right wing; all they usually have is legal fantasy.

We have a Commerce Clause; it is part of our supreme law of the land.
 
You really just have, lousy reading comprehension. A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.


We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
 
We discussed that before.

You refused to consider ANY of the costs of your position in your cost benefit analysis.

Thus your conclusion is garbage based solely on your loyalty to your fellow Mexicans.
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
 
You only have fallacy not any form of rebuttal. Simple rejection is not any form of valid argument.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism. The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism. We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
 
Are you retarded?
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
 
only those with lousy reading comprehension skills, say that.
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
 
You are retarded.
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
 
you are simply clueless and Causeless, next.
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
You are simply clueless and Causeless. A market friendly visa means anyone can be legal. It really is that simple. Only the right wing likes to whine about our illegal problem and exaggerate the exigency, to try to implement their socialism on a national basis.
 
You are retarded.
You actually believe everything is black and white.
Does Texas give a damn about Federal Regulations when it comes to pollution?
Apparently not and the Obama Administration didn't do Jack Shit about it.
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
You are simply clueless and Causeless. A market friendly visa means anyone can be legal. It really is that simple. Only the right wing likes to whine about our illegal problem and exaggerate the exigency, to try to implement their socialism on a national basis.

I presume you own a business or live off your portfolio.
 
apples and oranges.

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
You are simply clueless and Causeless. A market friendly visa means anyone can be legal. It really is that simple. Only the right wing likes to whine about our illegal problem and exaggerate the exigency, to try to implement their socialism on a national basis.

I presume you own a business or live off your portfolio.

I presume you are simply clueless and Causeless about economics and the law.
 
Both parties are responsible for a porous border and millions of illegals.
If you don't realize this you have a lot to learn.
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
You are simply clueless and Causeless. A market friendly visa means anyone can be legal. It really is that simple. Only the right wing likes to whine about our illegal problem and exaggerate the exigency, to try to implement their socialism on a national basis.

I presume you own a business or live off your portfolio.

I presume you are simply clueless and Causeless about economics and the law.

I assure you I am not the clueless one here.
You are just a cheap labor hog who didn't answer my question because you can't without showing what a pig you are.
 
nothing but diversion?

it is about solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism on a national basis.

A market friendly visa solves our illegal problem on a permanent basis via Capitalism, not socialism.

The right wing, prefers socialism, not capitalism.

We would not have an illegal problem, with a "truly market friendly visa".

We could be generating revenue to defray the cost of government.
You're a moron.
Nobody ever gave a damn about market friend visas for good pay.
For that we have visas such as H1-B which have rendered over 3 million people unemployed or underemployed.
Mexicans were always wanted for super cheap labor and nobody in Congress, with the exception of Jeff Sessions, have given a nod towards the issue.
Now wake up.
You are simply clueless and Causeless. A market friendly visa means anyone can be legal. It really is that simple. Only the right wing likes to whine about our illegal problem and exaggerate the exigency, to try to implement their socialism on a national basis.

I presume you own a business or live off your portfolio.

I presume you are simply clueless and Causeless about economics and the law.

I assure you I am not the clueless one here.
You are just a cheap labor hog who didn't answer my question because you can't without showing what a pig you are.
A market friendly visa will solve our illegal problem on a permanent basis via capitalism, and generate revenue to lower our tax burden.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top