Where do they draw the line, is there a line?

I already told you, I'm at work, I can't watch your stupid videos.

Can you make an argument without cut&paste or Glenn Beck clips?

Can't you challenge the lines on the chalk board?

You see, that's the beauty of what Beck does. You can't challenge "the lines on the chalk board" because they all do exist. What you can challenge is what Beck makes of the "lines". Beck will draw a line on the chalk board between, say, ACORN and Obama. The line does exist, because they have worked together in the past.

But Beck will use that connection to jump to the conclusion that Obama is a puppet of ACORN, which is incorrect.

Your making something out of nothing, no one including Beck ever suggested he was a puppet of ACORN, he was simply making the connection, to show that the left hand is not going to hurt the right hand. ACORN was helping with the "get out the vote" (Fraud) who do you think they were rooting for, McCain?

The lines on the chalk board are simply making connections, Beck points this out to America because most of us would never have time in our busy lives to ever find this stuff on our own. How many people would know who George Sorros is, if not for Glenn Beck and people like him?

That does not mean we all think Obama works for Sorros, but when a politician any politician has connections to big money, it does leave room for question. if the tail is wagging the dog?
 
As ridiculous as your scenarios are I do believe that if they actually played out as such, the libs would still follow blindly and still blame Bush claiming that Obama had to do what he had to do.

and rightwingers would follow blindly and still refuse to hold W accountable for what happened on his watch that led us to where we are as they try to blame obama for everything and try to make something out of anything no matter how small or obsure all so they can continue to attack obama.

To a small degree you are correct, many of us myself included allowed Bush to get away with far too much. That doesn't mean we should sit back and allow Obama even more room. We need to get this country back if we have chance for survival.
 
Horrible things Beck things is around the corner? Conservatives being rounded up and placed in concentration camps, for starters. Hyperinflation, for another. Then again, I don't expect him to offer evidence. It's impossible to offer real evidence of something you made up.

How did I miss that one??:lol:

He backed away from it later (and Fox sent in copyright violation requests to have the videos pulled from Youtube), but early last year, he claimed that FEMA was setting up concentration camps.

He debunked the FEMA camp rumor you nimrod.
 
I can't help but think where do they draw the line? Glenn Beck has said many times he hopes he is wrong but no one has yet been able to prove it or even challenge him on many of his claims. He recently asked America to agree with all our liberal screwball friends, yes Glenn Beck is nuts, but what if there's any truth to it, I know, I know, he's crazy, but what if any of it is true, does it matter?

I would like to pose a question to all the Liberal Screw Balls out there, all the Obama loving, Liberal/Progressive/Socialist nut jobs, where do you draw the line? At what point, is there a point, that you say, "uncle"? I mean let's say you wake up one day and Cass Sunstein is pouring sterilization drugs into the Ghetto's drinking water, do you scream OMG!, Glenn was right or do you go along with it because Obama thinks it's a good idea? If China calls us on our debt and we can't repay, then Obama tells them they can have the Midwest as repayment. Is that acceptable or do you finally break it off?

This is intended as a serious question. I really want to know if there is line that can be crossed or if you will simply follow this man and his agenda down any path no matter where it appears to be leading. Is there something that would make you take pause and maybe listen a little more closely to what Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Neal Boortz, Mark Levin and all the others have been trying to get America to understand. At what point do you remove the Obama 08 bumper sticker with a blow torch because you are so disgusted with what America is becoming.

This is not a Party thing, I'm not saying the Republican have all the answers, I just can't help but notice that no matter what he says, no matter what his people say or do there is a core group who will fight and defend it no matter what. If Bush sneezed wrong the media was all over him, but it seems Obama and his ilk get away with anything. I want to know where they draw the line, or if there is even a line at all. This is a question we ought to have been asking back in 2008, but that's the past, let's look to the future while we still have a Constitution to look up to.

Cheers,

Mike


"I mean let's say you wake up one day and Cass Sunstein is pouring sterilization drugs into the Ghetto's drinking water, do you scream OMG!"

liberals are probably more likely to outraged at someone sterilizing ghettos...

which makes me wonder...

if rush limbaugh and glenn beck told you that one of the big problems with America is all those poverty stricken ghetto families and the only answer was forced sterilization....

would you
a. agree
b. strongly agree
c. demand forced sterilization
d. consider sterilizing all liberals along with ghettos


"If China calls us on our debt and we can't repay, then Obama tells them they can have the Midwest as repayment. Is that acceptable or do you finally break it off?"


if sarah palin becomes our next president and offers china the peoples republic of Kalifornia would you
a. agree
b. understand
c. jump for joy
e. toss in the north east as added incentive

The ghettos are not the problem and Rush or Glenn have never said as much to my knowledge. The liberals have created the mess, which have allowed the Ghettos to get in the shape they are in. I wouldn't mind Sterilizing the Liberals.....

If Sarah Palin said that, which she wouldn't, I would obviously be against it, even if I would love to agree and toss in the North East. Hell I wonder is China would take the North East, hhhmmmmm???
 
Horrible things Beck things is around the corner? Conservatives being rounded up and placed in concentration camps, for starters. Hyperinflation, for another. Then again, I don't expect him to offer evidence. It's impossible to offer real evidence of something you made up.

How did I miss that one??:lol:

He backed away from it later (and Fox sent in copyright violation requests to have the videos pulled from Youtube), but early last year, he claimed that FEMA was setting up concentration camps.

Lying sack of shit.
 
[

You see, that's the beauty of what Beck does. You can't challenge "the lines on the chalk board" because they all do exist. What you can challenge is what Beck makes of the "lines". Beck will draw a line on the chalk board between, say, ACORN and Obama. The line does exist, because they have worked together in the past.

But Beck will use that connection to jump to the conclusion that Obama is a puppet of ACORN, which is incorrect.
Let's will try a different tack,

1. Do you believe that President Obama was properly vetted by the media while running ?YOUR ANSWER WAS YES

2. What did candidate Obama mean when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America. "

Like I posted in the other thread, that was rhetoric to his supporters to pump up the troops. He was probably referring to being the first black guy President, or to reversing Bush policies.

Do you think that if he was secretly trying to turn America into a Socialist country that he'd tell everyone about it?

So your answer was yes he was vetted and then you have to guess at what he meant when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."

Guessing what he means is an insufficient policy.

The way to discover what he means , is to find out what he believes, what he has written, what he has said,what he has done, who he has worked for , who does he surround himself with, who he trust, what they believe, what they have said, what have they written .

Do you have a better approach ,other than wait and see?
 
Well thanks .
I think that explains what Beck has been doing, it isnt hunting some conspiracy . He is just doing the job the MSM wouldnt do before the election.
Vetting the president and his friends.
 
I can't help but think where do they draw the line? Glenn Beck has said many times he hopes he is wrong but no one has yet been able to prove it or even challenge him on many of his claims. He recently asked America to agree with all our liberal screwball friends, yes Glenn Beck is nuts, but what if there's any truth to it, I know, I know, he's crazy, but what if any of it is true, does it matter?

I would like to pose a question to all the Liberal Screw Balls out there, all the Obama loving, Liberal/Progressive/Socialist nut jobs, where do you draw the line? At what point, is there a point, that you say, "uncle"? I mean let's say you wake up one day and Cass Sunstein is pouring sterilization drugs into the Ghetto's drinking water, do you scream OMG!, Glenn was right or do you go along with it because Obama thinks it's a good idea? If China calls us on our debt and we can't repay, then Obama tells them they can have the Midwest as repayment. Is that acceptable or do you finally break it off?

This is intended as a serious question. I really want to know if there is line that can be crossed or if you will simply follow this man and his agenda down any path no matter where it appears to be leading. Is there something that would make you take pause and maybe listen a little more closely to what Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Neal Boortz, Mark Levin and all the others have been trying to get America to understand. At what point do you remove the Obama 08 bumper sticker with a blow torch because you are so disgusted with what America is becoming.

This is not a Party thing, I'm not saying the Republican have all the answers, I just can't help but notice that no matter what he says, no matter what his people say or do there is a core group who will fight and defend it no matter what. If Bush sneezed wrong the media was all over him, but it seems Obama and his ilk get away with anything. I want to know where they draw the line, or if there is even a line at all. This is a question we ought to have been asking back in 2008, but that's the past, let's look to the future while we still have a Constitution to look up to.

Cheers,

Mike


"I mean let's say you wake up one day and Cass Sunstein is pouring sterilization drugs into the Ghetto's drinking water, do you scream OMG!"

liberals are probably more likely to outraged at someone sterilizing ghettos...

which makes me wonder...

if rush limbaugh and glenn beck told you that one of the big problems with America is all those poverty stricken ghetto families and the only answer was forced sterilization....

would you
a. agree
b. strongly agree
c. demand forced sterilization
d. consider sterilizing all liberals along with ghettos


"If China calls us on our debt and we can't repay, then Obama tells them they can have the Midwest as repayment. Is that acceptable or do you finally break it off?"


if sarah palin becomes our next president and offers china the peoples republic of Kalifornia would you
a. agree
b. understand
c. jump for joy
e. toss in the north east as added incentive

The ghettos are not the problem and Rush or Glenn have never said as much to my knowledge. The liberals have created the mess, which have allowed the Ghettos to get in the shape they are in. I wouldn't mind Sterilizing the Liberals.....

If Sarah Palin said that, which she wouldn't, I would obviously be against it, even if I would love to agree and toss in the North East. Hell I wonder is China would take the North East, hhhmmmmm???

"The ghettos are not the problem and Rush or Glenn have never said as much to my knowledge. The liberals have created the mess, which have allowed the Ghettos to get in the shape they are in. I wouldn't mind Sterilizing the Liberals....."


I see.
You wouldn't tmind sterilizing liberals...

now who else thought sterilization was a good ides....

let me think....

jesus?

nooooo

ghandi?

noooooo

oh yes...HITLER and the NAZIS!


"If Sarah Palin said that, which she wouldn't, I would obviously be against it, even if I would love to agree and toss in the North East. Hell I wonder is China would take the North East, hhhmmmmm??? "

sarah palin didn't say it
and neither did obama

and I think you lie

if palin or beck or limbaugh suggested giving Kalifornia or the peoples republic of san francisco to china I have no doubt you would be all for it
 
Well thanks .
I think that explains what Beck has been doing, it isnt hunting some conspiracy . He is just doing the job the MSM wouldnt do before the election.
Vetting the president and his friends.

To bad you couldnt find your way back to this thread Dr.In.
 
I can't help but think where do they draw the line? Glenn Beck has said many times he hopes he is wrong but no one has yet been able to prove it or even challenge him on many of his claims.

He was wrong about Iraq and virtually every other facet of the Bush Administration that he was a parrot for.

But I suppose we are just supposed to forget all that now, huh?
 
I can't help but think where do they draw the line? Glenn Beck has said many times he hopes he is wrong but no one has yet been able to prove it or even challenge him on many of his claims.

He was wrong about Iraq and virtually every other facet of the Bush Administration that he was a parrot for.

But I suppose we are just supposed to forget all that now, huh?
Well , thanks for another unsubstantiated lie, I haven't had my fill yet.
 
my2¢;2325603 said:
Starting a war without provocation will get me to jump off any President's bandwagon.

Ok, there's something! Is that it?

Pretty much, I'm pretty tolerant. In answering the question I reflected on my satisfaction with George W Bush up until Iraq. Policies are one thing, the lives of young Americans that put themselves on the line for us are another.

Too often I've arrived at work and saw the flag flying at half-staff. I'll get a company email saying that following state observances, the flag has been lowered to honor an Arizonan soldier that gave completely of him/her self. For 5 or 6 years now whenever I see a flag flying at half-staff my first thought is to hope it's to honor a politician.

As far as policies go, I don't agree with Obama's any more now than I did before the election. But I don't see any good coming from sitting here and joining those who are crying us a river with an attitude that I see as pretty much self-defeating.
 
[
[

You see, that's the beauty of what Beck does. You can't challenge "the lines on the chalk board" because they all do exist. What you can challenge is what Beck makes of the "lines". Beck will draw a line on the chalk board between, say, ACORN and Obama. The line does exist, because they have worked together in the past.

But Beck will use that connection to jump to the conclusion that Obama is a puppet of ACORN, which is incorrect.
Let's will try a different tack,

1. Do you believe that President Obama was properly vetted by the media while running ?YOUR ANSWER WAS YES

2. What did candidate Obama mean when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America. "

Like I posted in the other thread, that was rhetoric to his supporters to pump up the troops. He was probably referring to being the first black guy President, or to reversing Bush policies.

Do you think that if he was secretly trying to turn America into a Socialist country that he'd tell everyone about it?

So your answer was yes he was vetted and then you have to guess at what he meant when he said “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."

Guessing what he means is an insufficient policy.

The way to discover what he means , is to find out what he believes, what he has written, what he has said,what he has done, who he has worked for , who does he surround himself with, who he trust, what they believe, what they have said, what have they written .

Do you have a better approach ,other than wait and see?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top