Where Do Guns Belong..

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
.....in our eternal search for the 'crisis de jour'????

How does that old saw go, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”
Is there a saying for ‘fool me a dozen times’?




1. Heterosexual Aids “A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.” Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits - Health News, Health & Families - The Independent

2. Killer African Bees “Killer bees” are nothing more than a hyped-up scam foisted on the public to milk federal research dollars, a group of southern Arizona” Beesource Beekeeping » Some Beekeepers Believe “Killer Bees” are Fraud

3. Swine Flu? “Richard Schabas, Ontario's former chief medical officer of health, said in an interview yesterday that the first wave of the virus this spring was not as dire as expected, and the number of people infected in the Southern Hemisphere, now in the middle of its regular flu season, is nowhere as bad as feared.” H5N1: Canadian health expert: Swine flu panic overblown




4. Mad Cow Disease [Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)] “However, a fair review of the evidence from Britain and France indicates that the threat to human health from BSE in the United States is minimal.” “Mad Cow”: Is the Media Milking an Overblown Threat? | CEI

5. Bird Flu was about to ‘jump’ from chickens to humans. “Doomsday predictions about bird flu seem to be spreading faster than the virus itself. But a small group of skeptics say the bird flu hype is overblown and ultimately harmful to the public’s health. There’s no guarantee bird flu will become a pandemic, and if it does there’s no guarantee it will kill millions of people.” Skeptics warn bird flu fears are overblown - Bird Flu- msnbc.com

6. "SARS is a media circus more than a medical crisis." Letter From Hong Kong - SARS Threat Overblown - NAM





7. “Silicone gel implants were taken off the market in 1992 amidst fears that they could be linked to cancer, autoimmune and connective tissue disorders (such as lupus). But since the FDA approved their use again in 2006 many women and their surgeons have opted to use them rather than the implants filled with saline (salt water)." Silicone breast implants: Are they safe? - Your Health

8. “Y2K taught us lessons that will always be applicable: Dont believe everything the experts tell you, and be especially skeptical of worst-case predictions for technology” . Some Perspective 5 Years After Y2K - Security from eWeek

9. “… during the early 1990s a massive cholera outbreak in Latin America caused 10,000 deaths as a result of countries refusing to use chlorine to disinfect water supplies because of the labeling of chlorine as a carcinogen by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)” Milloy SJ. Junk Science Judo - Self-Defense Against Health Scares and Scams. The Cato Institute, Washington, DC, 2001, p. 1.

10.”… in 1975 research showed a cancer-causing effect of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in rats. The ensuing panic led to the 1976 federal law banning their production. In 1999, the same researcher found no association with human cancer. But the federal law remains in force.” Junk Science Judo by Steven J. Milloy





11. “According to Marjorie Mazel Hecht and [San Jose State University] professor J. Gordon Edwards at 21st Century Home Page, DDT is safe and indeed saved and can save human lives, and Rachel Carson's Silent Spring is full of lies. According to them, the banning of DDT was politically motivated and went against the majority of scientific opinion…. No one has conclusively proved that DDT can give you cancer.” The Straight Dope: Was Rachel Carson a fraud and is DDT actually safe for humans?

12. Global Warming…"the sky is falling" with a political twist.

As H. L. Menken said,
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.





John T. Flynn wrote in “As We Go Marching,” that the change, a seismic change, was from classically liberal to statist governing in all three governments, featuring the welfare state and government planning and direction of society. In 1944, Flynn predicted that the policies of the New Deal would lead to ever increasing federal deficits. Thus, he stated, the New Deal had put itself in a position of needing a state of permanent crisis, or one of permanent war, to justify its social interventions:

“It is born in crisis, lives on crisis, and cannot survive the era of crisis. By the very law of its nature it must create for itself, if it is to continue, fresh crises from year to year. Mussolini came to power in the postwar crisis and became himself a crisis in Italian life…Hitler’s story is the same. And our future is charted out upon the same turbulent road of permanent crisis.”
John T. Flynn, “As We Go Marching,” p. 255, 256.


So....guns?
The new number one?
Or right behind NYC subway trains.
 
Guns shouldn't even register on the crisis scale as there is no fucking gun crisis except for the one manufactured by the media and the gun grabbing control freaks...

Where was all the concern while better than 40 people a month are murdered in Obama's home town of Chicago? They just passed 500 murders for the year, that's more than one every day. Five hundred in one year, the majority of which committed with guns, and they have some of the toughest gun control laws in the nation! Now somehow more laws will make a difference? Only if you are a law abiding citizen because fuck knows the folks committing 500 murders a year in Chicago don't give a flying rhinoceros fart about gun control.

And one more thing...

Why all the outrage about Sandy Hook? Yeah, I understand that it is a tragedy of unimaginable proportions, I've got kids. But I also understand that, contrary to what many would have you believe, mass shootings such as this are the exception, not the rule...

So... Back to the question...

Why all the outrage about Sandy Hook? Why has this tragedy got eveyone up in, pardon the turn of phrase, arms? Is it the age of the children involved? Are the teens and young adults in Chicago somehow not as important? Or do they somehow provide a poor basis for the argument for gun control? Is it because there were 26 in one day? Does that somehow make a difference? More that 40 a month doesn't work but 26 in one day makes a more stirring argument for gun control? Is race the issue? Certainly it could be argued that the majority of Chicago murder victims would fall into the minority demographic while the victims of Sandy Hook were white... Are our gun grabbing friends only worried about white kids?

So, is Sandy Hook simply a crisis to be exploited? An opportunity for some to further their political goals? Until the concern and outrage is equal for all, I have to go with yes...
 
Guns belong in the possession of law abiding citizens who legally purchase them and then are responsible enough to learn how to use them.
 
Guns shouldn't even register on the crisis scale as there is no fucking gun crisis except for the one manufactured by the media and the gun grabbing control freaks...

Where was all the concern while better than 40 people a month are murdered in Obama's home town of Chicago? They just passed 500 murders for the year, that's more than one every day. Five hundred in one year, the majority of which committed with guns, and they have some of the toughest gun control laws in the nation! Now somehow more laws will make a difference? Only if you are a law abiding citizen because fuck knows the folks committing 500 murders a year in Chicago don't give a flying rhinoceros fart about gun control.

And one more thing...

Why all the outrage about Sandy Hook? Yeah, I understand that it is a tragedy of unimaginable proportions, I've got kids. But I also understand that, contrary to what many would have you believe, mass shootings such as this are the exception, not the rule...

So... Back to the question...

Why all the outrage about Sandy Hook? Why has this tragedy got eveyone up in, pardon the turn of phrase, arms? Is it the age of the children involved? Are the teens and young adults in Chicago somehow not as important? Or do they somehow provide a poor basis for the argument for gun control? Is it because there were 26 in one day? Does that somehow make a difference? More that 40 a month doesn't work but 26 in one day makes a more stirring argument for gun control? Is race the issue? Certainly it could be argued that the majority of Chicago murder victims would fall into the minority demographic while the victims of Sandy Hook were white... Are our gun grabbing friends only worried about white kids?

So, is Sandy Hook simply a crisis to be exploited? An opportunity for some to further their political goals? Until the concern and outrage is equal for all, I have to go with yes...

:clap2::clap2:
 
Guns belong in the possession of law abiding citizens who legally purchase them and then are responsible enough to learn how to use them.


A legislator on cable was saying that in the past 20 years, mass murders [most or all....can't remember ] have been committed in Gun Free Zones. :eusa_think:

SNIP:

"What a lethal, false security are the "gun-free zone" laws. Virtually all mass murders in the past 20 years have occurred in gun-free zones. The two people murdered several days earlier in a shopping center in Oregon were also killed in a gun-free zone.

"Hopefully, the Connecticut tragedy will be the tipping point after which a rising chorus of Americans will demand elimination of the gun-free zone laws that are in fact criminal-safe zones."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2012/12/16/gun-free-zones-larry-pratt/1773473/
 
Last edited:
"The people inside this building have no means of protecting themselves from criminals and mentally ill people, who wish to harm us by using firearms."

This statement was shortened to "Gun Free Zone", so it would fit neatly on placards that are posted on the doors of all entrances.
 
"The people inside this building have no means of protecting themselves from criminals and mentally ill people, who wish to harm us by using firearms."

This statement was shortened to "Gun Free Zone", so it would fit neatly on placards that are posted on the doors of all entrances.

I'll bet you've seen this report, but let me repeat it....it verifies your point.


"So why did the killer pick the Cinemark theater? You might think that it was the one closest to the killer’s apartment. Or, that it was the one with the largest audience.

Yet, neither explanation is right. Instead, out of all the movie theaters within 20 minutes of his apartment showing the new Batman movie that night, it was the only one where guns were banned.

In Colorado, individuals with permits can carry concealed handgun in most malls, stores, movie theaters, and restaurants. But private businesses can determine whether permit holders can carry guns on their private property.

Most movie theaters allow permit holders carrying guns. But the Cinemark movie theater was the only one with a sign posted at the theater’s entrance.

A simple web search and some telephone calls reveal how easily one can find out how Cinemark compared to other movie theaters. According to mapquest.com and movies.com, there were seven movie theaters showing "The Dark Knight Rises" on July 20th within 20 minutes of the killer’s apartment at 1690 Paris St, Aurora, Colorado. At 4 miles and an 8-minute car ride, the Cinemark’s Century Theater wasn't the closest. Another theater was only 1.2 miles (3 minutes) away.
There was also a theater just slightly further away, 10 minutes. It is the "home of Colorado's largest auditorium," according to their movie hotline greeting message. The potentially huge audience ought to have been attractive to someone trying to kill as many people as possible. Four other theaters were 18 minutes, two at 19 minutes, and 20 minutes away. But all of those theaters allowed permitted concealed handguns.

So why would a mass shooter pick a place that bans guns? The answer should be obvious, though it apparently is not clear to the media – disarming law-abiding citizens leaves them as sitting ducks."
Read more: Did Colorado shooter single out Cinemark theater because it banned guns? | Fox News
 

Forum List

Back
Top