Where do atheists get their values?

[danielpalos]

John Gray explores fixed idea, unquestioning atheism in his new book Seven Types of Atheism.

Where do atheists get their values?

I get mine from the dollar store!
EVERYTHING for just a buck; toothpaste, aspirin, morals, values...

all for a buck!

i sometimes wish i could find a masseuse at a dollar store.

 

[Mindful]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

 

[G.T.]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

 

[Mindful]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

 

[G.T.]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

 

[Mindful]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

 

[G.T.]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

 

[Mindful]

I would posit, that if there were undeniable and irrefutable proof of no deity, one would not be an atheist. There would be no need.

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

 

[Moonglow]

My question:

What is self-described atheist?

Ask John.

 

[harmonica]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

 

[G.T.]

That makes no sense. 1 of atheism's definitions is the positive belief in no god. They're already living, in their minds, in your hypothetical. Atheism is also the null hypothesis.

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

It seems that your statements don't stand up to direct scrutiny, and that's why you troll and act like a gnat instead.

 

[G.T.]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

Thats ridiculous. I can not believe in Unicorns and theyre not there and not true.

 

[Mindful]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

Explain that to Torqemadas. He's ready to put anyone who crosses him on the rack.

 

[Mindful]

No point in a debate with you then. In my hypothesis, there is NO G-D.

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

It seems that your statements don't stand up to direct scrutiny, and that's why you troll and act like a gnat instead.

There is no logic in that asinine statement.

 

[G.T.]

Yea, that's what an atheist already believes.

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

It seems that your statements don't stand up to direct scrutiny, and that's why you troll and act like a gnat instead.

There is no logic in that asinine statement.

I know there isn't, so you shouldn't have stated it. Its evident why you don't discuss your OPs in depth. Youre not smart enough, and are a troll. Its evident.

 

[harmonica]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

Thats ridiculous. I can not believe in Unicorns and theyre not there and not true.

no--that's ridiculous
everyone KNOWS there are no unicorns/etc
it's like saying ''''I don't believe in Santa''''--no--YOU KNOW there is no Santa

 

[G.T.]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

Thats ridiculous. I can not believe in Unicorns and theyre not there and not true.

no--that's ridiculous
everyone KNOWS there are no unicorns/etc
it's like saying ''''I don't believe in Santa''''--no--YOU KNOW there is no Santa

You're making my case. Thumbs up!

 

[Mindful]

Do I have to explain it to you a second time?

Or are you being wilfully obtuse?

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

It seems that your statements don't stand up to direct scrutiny, and that's why you troll and act like a gnat instead.

There is no logic in that asinine statement.

I know there isn't, so you shouldn't have stated it. Its evident why you don't discuss your OPs in depth. Youre not smart enough, and are a troll. Its evident.

We're done then, you grumpy old man?

 

[harmonica]

there is no such thing as atheism because there is no god
you cannot not believe in something that is not there/not true

Thats ridiculous. I can not believe in Unicorns and theyre not there and not true.

no--that's ridiculous
everyone KNOWS there are no unicorns/etc
it's like saying ''''I don't believe in Santa''''--no--YOU KNOW there is no Santa

You're making my case. Thumbs up!

sure I am......

 

[G.T.]

Look, your statement was fucking stupid.

If there was proof there is NO god, there would be no THEISTS, not no Atheists.

It was a dumb thing to say that there would be "no need," because atheism isn't based on a "need." Its a position on whether or not a God exists. If one doesnt, atheism not only exists, but if its proven, then EVERYONE is an atheist. Not noone.

No wonder.

Don't post to me then,if it upsets you.

Problem solved.

It seems that your statements don't stand up to direct scrutiny, and that's why you troll and act like a gnat instead.

There is no logic in that asinine statement.

I know there isn't, so you shouldn't have stated it. Its evident why you don't discuss your OPs in depth. Youre not smart enough, and are a troll. Its evident.

We're done then, you grumpy old man?

I'm half your age, tard. Maybe a 1/3 judging by the profile pic.