Where did the plane go in Pennsylvania?

actually straight down can mean to some folks 40 degrees...good grief.
Maybe to mentally handicapped or blind people.
ignorant much?


a unit of measure for angles equal to an angle with its vertex at the center of a circle and its sides cutting off 1⁄360 of the circumference; also : a unit of measure for arcs of a circle equal to the amount of arc that subtends a central angle of one degree
9archaic : a position or space on the earth or in the heavens as measured by degrees of latitude
 
Why do we need to defend the truth? According to Wiki 600 lbs of human remains were recovered. It's 8% of the estimated total weight of passingers and crew. The rest was consumed in the fire.
What you're saying is 92% of the passengers got consumed in the fire, but only 5% of the plane did?

And if they all got mostly consumed in the fire, that means all 44 passenger's bodies landed in that small section of burned out forest? Wouldn't there be a crap load of plane debris pilled up in that forest too if 95% of the plane survived (regardless what size the pieces were) and since it was reported the passengers were both in the front and back of the plane during the revolt a little before impact?

I'm saying that 600 pounds of human remains were recovered. That's 8 % of the total weight of the crew and passingers. It doesn't mean that 92% of the passingers were consumed in the fire. It means that 92% of each passinger was not recovered due to the impact and the fire. There was a ten foot freaking hole in the ground 30 ft around caused by a "violent impact". The flight recorder was recovered that tells us what happened. How in Gods green earth can the tin foil hats come up with a conspiracy theory about Flight 93? You want a real conspiracy? Most of flight 800 was recovered when something blew it out of the sky over Long Island NY. They called it an accident?
 
They are only "official witnesses" because they are saying what the truthers want to hear. If they said anything else, they would be "plants". Or "shills"
So what are these three teenagers to you skeptics, liars?

Paid actors.
Xchel, is this what you believe too?

And what is your guy's evidence they are actors, other than you really really really don't want there to be a conspiracy?
 
Why do we need to defend the truth? According to Wiki 600 lbs of human remains were recovered. It's 8% of the estimated total weight of passingers and crew. The rest was consumed in the fire.
What you're saying is 92% of the passengers got consumed in the fire, but only 5% of the plane did?

And if they all got mostly consumed in the fire, that means all 44 passenger's bodies landed in that small section of burned out forest? Wouldn't there be a crap load of plane debris pilled up in that forest too if 95% of the plane survived (regardless what size the pieces were) and since it was reported the passengers were both in the front and back of the plane during the revolt a little before impact?

I'm saying that 600 pounds of human remains were recovered. That's 8 % of the total weight of the crew and passingers. It doesn't mean that 92% of the passingers were consumed in the fire. It means that 92% of each passinger was not recovered due to the impact and the fire. There was a ten foot freaking hole in the ground 30 ft around caused by a "violent impact". The flight recorder was recovered that tells us what happened. How in Gods green earth can the tin foil hats come up with a conspiracy theory about Flight 93? You want a real conspiracy? Most of flight 800 was recovered when something blew it out of the sky over Long Island NY. They called it an accident?
they do it because dating is too stressful :eusa_whistle:
 
So what are these three teenagers to you skeptics, liars?

Paid actors.
Xchel, is this what you believe too?

And what is your guy's evidence they are actors, other than you really really really don't want there to be a conspiracy?
SLCNutbaroMeterDelusional_3.jpg
 
So what are these three teenagers to you skeptics, liars?

Paid actors.
Xchel, is this what you believe too?

And what is your guy's evidence they are actors, other than you really really really don't want there to be a conspiracy?

1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
2) the fact that they are smiling, giggling and laughing as they give their "accounts"
3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
 
Paid actors.
Xchel, is this what you believe too?

And what is your guy's evidence they are actors, other than you really really really don't want there to be a conspiracy?

1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
2) the fact that they are smiling, giggling and laughing as they give their "accounts"
3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
:clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
Oh good grief. How many other minors were interviewed for that film? And all the other ones who gave their full names, are they genuine, or actors (liars) too?

2) the fact that they are smiling, giggling and laughing as they give their "accounts"
Yeah because teenagers together are always known to be serious at all times. :cuckoo:

What made them start giggling and how long did they giggle for?

So the GNN director said they look too serious, laugh a bit? According to your logic, wouldn't that make it more obvious they were phonies?

3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
How many other students would be outside the school at 10:03 am?

Btw, if these three are actors, how come no one at the very small school were everyone would know everyone has come out and said those three didn't go to Shanksville? GNN fooled the whole school and town too?! :lol:
 
Last edited:
1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
Oh good grief. How many other minors were interviewed for that film? And all the other ones who gave their full names, are they genuine, or actors (liars) too?

2) the fact that they are smiling, giggling and laughing as they give their "accounts"
Yeah because teenagers together are always known to be serious at all times. :cuckoo:

What made them start giggling and how long did they giggle for?

So the GNN director said they look too serious, laugh a bit? According to your logic, wouldn't that make it more obvious they were phonies?

3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
How many other students would be outside the school at 10:03 am?

Btw, if these three are actors, how come no one at the very small school were everyone would know everyone has come out and said those three didn't go to Shanksville? GNN fooled the whole school and town too?! :lol:
more meaningless minutia!:cuckoo:
 
so surely you can provide who these students are and what their names are since you are so sure of what they saw and that it was the truth....no one else saw it? yeah right...the whole thing looks like a staged lie....especially since not a single witness at any of the hearings match these kids..where are they by the way all these years later? It seems they as adults would be shouting about it from the rooftops...
 
1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
Oh good grief. How many other minors were interviewed for that film? And all the other ones who gave their full names, are they genuine, or actors (liars) too?

2) the fact that they are smiling, giggling and laughing as they give their "accounts"
Yeah because teenagers together are always known to be serious at all times. :cuckoo:

What made them start giggling and how long did they giggle for?

So the GNN director said they look too serious, laugh a bit? According to your logic, wouldn't that make it more obvious they were phonies?

3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
How many other students would be outside the school at 10:03 am?

Btw, if these three are actors, how come no one at the very small school were everyone would know everyone has come out and said those three didn't go to Shanksville? GNN fooled the whole school and town too?! :lol:

They were smiling and giggling the entire interview. Now tell me, if you were discussing witnessing the deaths of all the people on that plane, would you find anything about it to laugh about?

And who said they weren't students? They probably were, but were paid to say what they did. And if you don't think that's possible, here's something you can do to test it. Go to any high school in the US. Pick any 3 random students, and offer them $50 to read a script. I guarantee that you can get them to confess to shooting JFK, ordering the attack on Pearl Harbor, and invading the Bay of Pigs.

And how lucky it was that the reporter managed to find the only 3 kids that were cutting class that day. :cuckoo:
 
1) the fact that they won't give their full names, unlike the rest of the witnesses on that tape.
Oh good grief. How many other minors were interviewed for that film? And all the other ones who gave their full names, are they genuine, or actors (liars) too?


Yeah because teenagers together are always known to be serious at all times. :cuckoo:

What made them start giggling and how long did they giggle for?

So the GNN director said they look too serious, laugh a bit? According to your logic, wouldn't that make it more obvious they were phonies?

3) the fact that they claim to be the only 3 students in that entire high school that saw anything.
How many other students would be outside the school at 10:03 am?

Btw, if these three are actors, how come no one at the very small school were everyone would know everyone has come out and said those three didn't go to Shanksville? GNN fooled the whole school and town too?! :lol:

They were smiling and giggling the entire interview. Now tell me, if you were discussing witnessing the deaths of all the people on that plane, would you find anything about it to laugh about?

And who said they weren't students? They probably were, but were paid to say what they did. And if you don't think that's possible, here's something you can do to test it. Go to any high school in the US. Pick any 3 random students, and offer them $50 to read a script. I guarantee that you can get them to confess to shooting JFK, ordering the attack on Pearl Harbor, and invading the Bay of Pigs.

And how lucky it was that the reporter managed to find the only 3 kids that were cutting class that day. :cuckoo:
or talked to the drama teacher!
don't remember any kids laughing after columbine .....
 
And who said they weren't students? They probably were, but were paid to say what they did.
Oh so now they were Shanksville High's own students that were paid to lie! Your GNN conspiracy is getting funnier by the moment. :lol:

Xchel, do you think these three alleged lying teenagers were actual students there?
 

Forum List

Back
Top