Where are the results of MH17 investigation?

Figaro

VIP Member
Jul 23, 2014
328
56
80
KUALA LUMPUR: INTELLIGENCE analysts in the United States had already concluded that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with it.
This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air missile and finished off with cannon fire from a fighter that had been shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.
In a damning report dated Aug 3, headlined “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts”, Associated Press reporter Robert Parry said “some US intelligence sources had concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame”.
This new revelation was posted on GlobalResearch, an independent research and media organisation.
The New Straits Times quoted experts who had said that photographs of the blast fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two distinct shapes — the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed with “flechettes”, and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes consistent with that of cannon rounds.
Parry’s conclusion also stemmed from the fact that despite assertions from the Obama administration, there has not been a shred of tangible evidence to support the conclusion that Russia supplied the rebels with the BUK-M1 anti-aircraft missile system that would be needed to hit a civilian jetliner flying at 33,000 feet.
In the CBC interview, the reporter in the video preceded it with: “The wreckage was still smouldering when a small team from the OSCE got there. No other officials arrived for days”.
“There have been two or three pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked with what almost looks like machinegun fire; very, very strong machinegun fire,” Bociurkiw said in the interview...

And the results of the investigation have not yet been made public. The Ukrainian side is away from direct answers
 
The website he got that fromGlobalresearch.ca (also under the domain name globalresearch.org) is the website of the Montreal-based non-profit The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) founded by Michel Chossudovsky.While many of Globalresearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian orenvironmental concerns, the site has a strong undercurrent of reality warping throughout its pages, especially in relation to taking its news from sources such as Russia Today. Its view of science, the economy andgeopolitics seems to be broadly conspiracist.Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites Globalresearch,they are almost certainly wrong.
 
The website he got that fromGlobalresearch.ca (also under the domain name globalresearch.org) is the website of the Montreal-based non-profit The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) founded by Michel Chossudovsky.While many of Globalresearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian orenvironmental concerns, the site has a strong undercurrent of reality warping throughout its pages, especially in relation to taking its news from sources such as Russia Today. Its view of science, the economy andgeopolitics seems to be broadly conspiracist.Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites Globalresearch,they are almost certainly wrong.

Yet, there has been no follow-up.
 
Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 black box findings consistent with blast - CBS News

[QUOTE"B. Kidd, post: 9724698, member: 23873"]
The website he got that fromGlobalresearch.ca (also under the domain name globalresearch.org) is the website of the Montreal-based non-profit The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) founded by Michel Chossudovsky.While many of Globalresearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian orenvironmental concerns, the site has a strong undercurrent of reality warping throughout its pages, especially in relation to taking its news from sources such as Russia Today. Its view of science, the economy andgeopolitics seems to be broadly conspiracist.Whenever someone makes a remarkable claim and cites Globalresearch,they are almost certainly wrong.

Yet, there has been no follow-up.[/QUOTE]
 
From your link......"unreleased data"......."unnamed official".........release the data!
It took 4 months after Air France recovery of the black boxes before an official report was released and it has been less than a month since they got the black boxes here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top