Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ask John Boehnor and Mitch McConnell why they had signed a pledge to demand cuts in spending after their party borrowed 80% of all the debt accrued across 232 years and funneled it to the rich in the form of tax cuts.
Did your IQ test return a negative result?
Tested three times. In high school, in OCS in the army and once by mensa in Knoxville, TN. Average of the three scores.......129.
Lowering taxes in 2001 did create jobs. We had near full employment until 2006 when Democrats took office.
At this point, increasing taxes would burden the economy. refusing to raise taxes isnt going to create jobs, it's just going to prevent us from losing more jobs.
If you want to see job creation explode in record numbers you will recommend:
1) Cutting taxes further
2) Serious spending cuts, and
3) Eliminating regulation.
Do these three things, and you will see unprecedented economic growth. Unfortunately, the last President to actually accomplish this was Calvin Coolidge. Amost 90 years ago. Since he left office, startng with Hoover onward there has been nothing but big government politicians in control.
Yeah like the fantasitic Reagan years. He and Bush41 quadrupled the national debt and funneled trillions of dollars of the borrowed money into the pockets of the wealthiest Americans through tax cuts.
The only thing wrong about the Democrats taking the congress is that it was too late.
In the 2006 elections 31 congressional seats changed to the Democrats and after 14 years of being the majority the Republicans became the minority party. The first thing the Democrats did was vote to increase the minimum wage which had stagnated. I wonder if it had anything to do with this
Notice that all wage groups except the top 21% lost ground:
Ask John Boehnor and Mitch McConnell why they had signed a pledge to demand cuts in spending after their party borrowed 80% of all the debt accrued across 232 years and funneled it to the rich in the form of tax cuts.
Did your IQ test return a negative result?
Tested three times. In high school, in OCS in the army and once by mensa in Knoxville, TN. Average of the three scores.......129.
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
22 thousand immediate jobs available if obamie okays the pipeline but his ignorant ass won't dew it.
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
22 thousand immediate jobs available if obamie okays the pipeline but his ignorant ass won't dew it.
There are also millions of shovel-ready jobs...
Oh, wait...
Did your IQ test return a negative result?
Tested three times. In high school, in OCS in the army and once by mensa in Knoxville, TN. Average of the three scores.......129.
You'd think the Army would test one's IQ BEFORE they get to OCS.
Fucking liar.
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
Ask Obama. Apparently, he's the President.
Lowering taxes in 2001 did create jobs. We had near full employment until 2006 when Democrats took office.
At this point, increasing taxes would burden the economy. refusing to raise taxes isnt going to create jobs, it's just going to prevent us from losing more jobs.
If you want to see job creation explode in record numbers you will recommend:
1) Cutting taxes further
2) Serious spending cuts, and
3) Eliminating regulation.
Do these three things, and you will see unprecedented economic growth. Unfortunately, the last President to actually accomplish this was Calvin Coolidge. Amost 90 years ago. Since he left office, startng with Hoover onward there has been nothing but big government politicians in control.
Yeah like the fantasitic Reagan years. He and Bush41 quadrupled the national debt and funneled trillions of dollars of the borrowed money into the pockets of the wealthiest Americans through tax cuts.
The only thing wrong about the Democrats taking the congress is that it was too late.
In the 2006 elections 31 congressional seats changed to the Democrats and after 14 years of being the majority the Republicans became the minority party. The first thing the Democrats did was vote to increase the minimum wage which had stagnated. I wonder if it had anything to do with this
Notice that all wage groups except the top 21% lost ground:
Lowering taxes in 2001 did create jobs. We had near full employment until 2006 when Democrats took office.
At this point, increasing taxes would burden the economy. refusing to raise taxes isnt going to create jobs, it's just going to prevent us from losing more jobs.
If you want to see job creation explode in record numbers you will recommend:
1) Cutting taxes further
2) Serious spending cuts, and
3) Eliminating regulation.
Do these three things, and you will see unprecedented economic growth. Unfortunately, the last President to actually accomplish this was Calvin Coolidge. Amost 90 years ago. Since he left office, startng with Hoover onward there has been nothing but big government politicians in control.
Yeah like the fantasitic Reagan years. He and Bush41 quadrupled the national debt and funneled trillions of dollars of the borrowed money into the pockets of the wealthiest Americans through tax cuts.
The only thing wrong about the Democrats taking the congress is that it was too late.
In the 2006 elections 31 congressional seats changed to the Democrats and after 14 years of being the majority the Republicans became the minority party. The first thing the Democrats did was vote to increase the minimum wage which had stagnated. I wonder if it had anything to do with this
Notice that all wage groups except the top 21% lost ground:
Ya think? Raising the minimum wage certainly contributed to raising the unemployment numbers.
Yeah like the fantasitic Reagan years. He and Bush41 quadrupled the national debt and funneled trillions of dollars of the borrowed money into the pockets of the wealthiest Americans through tax cuts.
The only thing wrong about the Democrats taking the congress is that it was too late.
In the 2006 elections 31 congressional seats changed to the Democrats and after 14 years of being the majority the Republicans became the minority party. The first thing the Democrats did was vote to increase the minimum wage which had stagnated. I wonder if it had anything to do with this
Notice that all wage groups except the top 21% lost ground:
Ya think? Raising the minimum wage certainly contributed to raising the unemployment numbers.
ROTFLMAO!
A Republican's dream. Three employees doing the work of five. Next think you know we'll be returning to county poor houses.
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
They will now tell you that regulation is the problem.
Whatever the root of the problem is - it can't be a consumer demand issue - because that would imply that we need to shift some tax burden from middle to upper class (at least temporarily) - and the right in Congress has already indicated that is a "principle" they won't compromise.
What amazes me is that the founding fathers were able to compromise on the issue of owning other human beings as property - but the right won't compromise on a tax hike for the rich who now enjoy the lowest tax rates of their working lives (unless they are like 100 years old) - in exchange for spending cuts they claim are desperately needed,
Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
They will now tell you that regulation is the problem.
Whatever the root of the problem is - it can't be a consumer demand issue - because that would imply that we need to shift some tax burden from middle to upper class (at least temporarily) - and the right in Congress has already indicated that is a "principle" they won't compromise.
What amazes me is that the founding fathers were able to compromise on the issue of owning other human beings as property - but the right won't compromise on a tax hike for the rich who now enjoy the lowest tax rates of their working lives (unless they are like 100 years old) - in exchange for spending cuts they claim are desperately needed,
Lowering taxes in 2001 did create jobs. We had near full employment until 2006 when Democrats took office.
.
LOL! I own a duplex valued at 197k. If I put a new kitchen and bathroom on the owner side (our side) for 75k, that's be over half the value of our one side of the house.Republican politicians continue to repeat ad nauseum that the reason they defend low tax rates for the wealthy is to sustain an environment which creates new jobs. Tax rates at this time are the lowest they've been in nearly 50 years. Why is the unemployment rate hovering around 9%
They will now tell you that regulation is the problem.
Whatever the root of the problem is - it can't be a consumer demand issue - because that would imply that we need to shift some tax burden from middle to upper class (at least temporarily) - and the right in Congress has already indicated that is a "principle" they won't compromise.
What amazes me is that the founding fathers were able to compromise on the issue of owning other human beings as property - but the right won't compromise on a tax hike for the rich who now enjoy the lowest tax rates of their working lives (unless they are like 100 years old) - in exchange for spending cuts they claim are desperately needed,
Question for you.....
Lets say things were going well for you and you decided to put 75K in a new klitchen and bathroom in your home.
You had a nice job. You just received a raise...all is looking secure for you.
You started collecting bids...ready to dive into the project.
Then, out of the blue, you found out that your school and property taxes were going up. Likewise, whereas you got a raise, you found out that from next month on, you will need to pay for your own health insurance. Furthermore, you got a notice from your heating company saying that your contract expired, and your new contract will cost you about 20% more.
Would you reconsider the project on your kitchen and bath?
Enough said.
Over 113,000 pages of new regs have been passed this year alone.
New companies can no longer afford to start up b/c they can't understand all the regs and can't afford the team of lawyers that can.
therefore big biz has no new competition to lose employees too. And since they can only expect more regs, thus increasing the cost of doing biz, they must wait it out or risk loosing enough capital to compete.
