When will the Republcians learn to stop apologizing?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Little-Acorn, Mar 28, 2007.

  1. Little-Acorn
    Offline

    Little-Acorn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,354
    Thanks Received:
    2,022
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings:
    +5,846
    I disagree with Coulter on one thing in this article. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, my former Congressman here in San Diego, took bribes and peddled influence. He does NOT deserve a pardon.

    On the rest, Ann is right on.

    ---------------------------

    http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

    'SORRY' DOESN'T SEEM TO BE THE HARDEST WORD

    by Ann Coulter
    March 28, 2007

    When will Republicans learn to stop apologizing?

    The Bush administration is embroiled in the most ridiculous non-scandal scandal in human history — set off when the administration stupidly apologized for firing its own employees.

    U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. The president may fire them for any reason at all. That includes not implementing the president's policy about criminal prosecutions. It also includes being in the way of someone else whom the president wants to appoint for patronage reasons.

    Why wasn't a fuss made when Bush fired Donald Rumsfeld? He is every bit as much a political appointee as the U.S. attorneys are.

    Democrats have the breathtaking audacity to claim that Bush's replacing his own political appointees is "politicizing prosecutions."

    They say this as Sandy Berger walks free after stealing and destroying top-secret national security documents — but Lewis "Scooter" Libby faces decades in prison for )not outing a covert agent. (Let's hope he's learned his lesson!)

    They say this as Rep. William "The Refrigerator" Jefferson sits on the Homeland Security Committee while waiting for the $100,000 found in his freezer to thaw — but Tom DeLay remains under an indictment by some hick prosecutor in Texas for an alleged accounting violation.

    They say this as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid draws interest on the sale of a property he sold in a complicated land swindle — but American hero Randy "Duke" Cunningham rots in prison.

    They say this while Sen. Chuck Schumer pays no price whatsoever for his Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee having illegally obtained a copy of Republican Lt. Gov. Michael Steele's credit report, for which one employee, Lauren Weiner, pleaded guilty, but served no prison time.

    They say this while Sen. Teddy Kennedy is still at large (and getting larger).

    Democrats have created a world in which a DNC card is a "get out of jail free" card, and "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" means "no doubt the defendant is Republican." (If Democrats keep this up, they'll have to rethink their push to give inmates the right to vote.)

    Then they turn around and say Republicans are "politicizing prosecutions" by firing their own employees. And all Republicans can do is apologize.

    I refuse to parse the inane allegations the Democrats are making, to point out that Clinton's wholesale firing of Republican U.S. attorneys was worse, or to mention that some of these U.S. attorneys should have been fired a long time ago (Carol Lam).

    Bush should say: "We did it, it was political, and there's nothing you can do about it."

    Then he should start holding hearings on Congress' obstruction of the war effort. Members of Congress should be asked to come before the administration's hearings and testify under oath about their commitment to victory. If they are not traitors, what do they have to hide? Surely they will be willing to state under oath that they are not undermining the war effort for partisan political gain.
    The hearings could be televised in prime time: "Traitor or No Traitor?"

    The president's investigatory power is better grounded than is Congress'. There is no "hearings and investigations" clause in Article I, describing Congress' powers, but the Recommendation Clause of Article II, Section 3 obligates the president to "from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union."

    If the State of the Union is that we have a treasonous majority in Congress that is affirmatively undermining American national security, the president is constitutionally obliged to give Congress information to that effect. How can he make that judgment without gathering the necessary data?

    While he's at it, the Bush hearings should look into the Democrats' hiring and firing practices. Were the dedicated staffers who worked on various committees while the Republicans were in control retained by the incoming Democrats? Or were some of those staffers fired because of their (gasp!) partisan affiliation?

    Finally, just for the Democrats' mentioning Randy "Duke" Cunningham's name, Bush should pardon him immediately.

    Admittedly, in this one case, the Republican was actually guilty of something. Cunningham took bribes — he didn't kill a girl at Chappaquiddick. To put it another way, the only thing Duke Cunningham ever sank was his own career.

    And in one glorious afternoon over North Vietnam, Duke Cunningham did more for his county than the entire Democratic caucus will do in a lifetime.

    The president has absolute authority to fire U.S. attorneys, hold investigative hearings and grant pardons. What's he worried about? That the media will be hysterical and Democrats will call him names? Constantly apologizing doesn't seem to have worked out too well for him either. How about doing something for the Americans who elected him?

    Ah, but I see he has! As we go to press, news comes across the transom that Bush has withdrawn the nomination of Sam Fox as ambassador to Belgium because Democrats are upset that Fox gave a donation to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

    There's no hope.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    I could care less what Coulter has to say. The question posed in the thread title hits the nail on the head.
     
  3. maineman
    Offline

    maineman BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,003
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    guess
    Ratings:
    +572
    I could care less if they apologize or not.... apologies are just words.

    If they would admit that they fucked up by invading Iraq and further admit that they realize that such a royal fuck up deserves the punishment that being the minority party entails...if they would knock the chip off their own shoulder, step aside and let the democrats run the show for a decade or so until they have served their penance, that would be better than all the empty apologies they might otherwise offer.
     
  4. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    So the Dems could take us further into the mediocracy of the one world order? I think not.

    I think the Democrats should apologize for dusting off their volumes of "How We Brought About the Defeat of the US in Vietnam" and perpetrating that fraud on the American people again.

    The fact is, everytime Dems have had power they have done exactly what they're trying to do with it now .... abuse it.

    The Republicans get it and are afraid to use it.
     
  5. maineman
    Offline

    maineman BANNED

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    13,003
    Thanks Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    guess
    Ratings:
    +572

    how soon we forget that Dick Nixon was the peace candidate in '68 AND in '72.

    when republicans get power, they just pull their dicks out and step on them.
     
  6. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    He capitalized on a mood created by the left and the MSM. I haven't forgotten. Nor have I forgotten who started and escalated that war.

    But you have to admit ... those Democrats and Republicans don't exist anymore.
     
  7. Adam's Apple
    Offline

    Adam's Apple Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,092
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +447
    I agree that Annie made some valid points in her article, and I feel her frustration with this latest accusation put out there by the Dems. Get real--everything in Washington, D.C. is political, and Dems play the game of politics much better than the GOP. The Dems know where to push the buttons to make the Republicans look bad to the unsuspecting public. You’d think the Republicans would have learned how to play hardball as well as the Dems; but, alas, they haven’t. The double standard is still in play. The Dems get away with their political shenanigans, while the Republicans are brought to task in the media for any seemingly violation.
     

Share This Page