When will the murderers be tried?

Possibly at the same time Israel conforms to UNSCR 242 and the GCIV protocols.

It's the occupation, Stupid.

Georgie, you're severely uneducated.

242 is non-binding and requires nothing of Israel. 242 is predicated on Israel's enemies making peace with Israel.

Now, you're a little less clueless, Georgie.
 
Last edited:
"On 27 December 2008, without warning, Israeli forces began a devastating bombing campaign on the Gaza Strip codenamed Operation 'Cast Lead'. Its stated aim was to end rocket attacks into Israel by armed groups affiliated with Hamas and other Palestinian factions.

"By 18 January 2009 some 1,400 Palestinians had been killed and large areas of Gaza had been razed to the ground.

"Amnesty International believes that the deaths of so many unarmed civilians and the manner in which they came under attack demand a thorough, independent and impartial investigation into the conduct of all parties in the conflict."

Any thoughts on why "Noble Israel" initiated this bloodbath by targeting a police graduation ceremony?

Amnesty International

Your own post answered the question, dipshit. You need to be medicated.
At least two of Israel's murderers have already been convicted.

"The southern command military court convicted two Israeli soldiers on Sunday of using human shields during Operation Cast Lead, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, in the winter of 2008-2009.

"The soldiers were convicted of offenses including inappropriate behavior and overstepping authority for ordering an 11-year-old Palestinian to search bags suspected to have been booby trapped"

"The conviction is the first such conviction for what is termed in the Israel Defense Forces 'neighbor procedure' – the use of human shields during searches and pursuits, which has been outlawed."

Maybe you need the "neighbor procedure?"

IDF Convicts

Israeli democracy, Georgie.

Georgie, when will your pal in Sudan responsible for the genocide of millions in Darfur and southern be brought to justice?

Georgie, the total fraud.
 
Where are all the UN findings about the disgusting terrorist attacks by terrorists on the civilian population of Israel?

Where are the steps taken to prosecute the planners? Why aren't the leaders of Hezbollah and Hamas dragged out and charged for attacks on Israeli civilians and for using their civilian populations as shields.

Never mind... rhetorical question.

Now STFU.

But jillian, I thought you were an anti-semite! :eusa_eh: Your constantly changing position is confusing! :evil:










:lol:
 
Your own post answered the question, dipshit. You need to be medicated.
At least two of Israel's murderers have already been convicted.

"The southern command military court convicted two Israeli soldiers on Sunday of using human shields during Operation Cast Lead, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, in the winter of 2008-2009.

"The soldiers were convicted of offenses including inappropriate behavior and overstepping authority for ordering an 11-year-old Palestinian to search bags suspected to have been booby trapped"

"The conviction is the first such conviction for what is termed in the Israel Defense Forces 'neighbor procedure' – the use of human shields during searches and pursuits, which has been outlawed."

Maybe you need the "neighbor procedure?"

IDF Convicts

And that shows israel is a just society.
When did the Palestinians punish the perpetrators of the 2000 Ramallah lynching?
2000 Ramallah lynching - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ramallah-lynching.jpg


You need meds. Bad.

The Palestinians lynched criminals who would still be walking the streets if they had waited for law enforcement to do anything.
 
At least two of Israel's murderers have already been convicted.

"The southern command military court convicted two Israeli soldiers on Sunday of using human shields during Operation Cast Lead, Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, in the winter of 2008-2009.

"The soldiers were convicted of offenses including inappropriate behavior and overstepping authority for ordering an 11-year-old Palestinian to search bags suspected to have been booby trapped"

"The conviction is the first such conviction for what is termed in the Israel Defense Forces 'neighbor procedure' – the use of human shields during searches and pursuits, which has been outlawed."

Maybe you need the "neighbor procedure?"

IDF Convicts

And that shows israel is a just society.
When did the Palestinians punish the perpetrators of the 2000 Ramallah lynching?
2000 Ramallah lynching - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ramallah-lynching.jpg


You need meds. Bad.

The Palestinians lynched criminals who would still be walking the streets if they had waited for law enforcement to do anything.

Due process is non-existent in the fascist Arab/Muslim/Pallie world.
 
And that shows israel is a just society.
When did the Palestinians punish the perpetrators of the 2000 Ramallah lynching?
2000 Ramallah lynching - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ramallah-lynching.jpg


You need meds. Bad.

The Palestinians lynched criminals who would still be walking the streets if they had waited for law enforcement to do anything.

Due process is non-existent in the fascist Arab/Muslim/Pallie world.

That is true but it is due to it being controlled by Israel
 
"The soldiers were convicted of offenses including inappropriate behavior and overstepping authority for ordering an 11-year-old Palestinian to search bags suspected to have been booby trapped"
Funny, how the Haaretz is the favourite to quote, must be the same selective amnesia. Did they mention the dumbass boy was ordered to open bags in his home? Nah. Well, I guess, next time in a similar situation soldiers won't be asking anything and will just blow stuff up to be sure. A win-win, indeed.
 
Possibly at the same time Israel conforms to UNSCR 242 and the GCIV protocols.
Ahh, the resolution drivel. Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war ..." blah-blah-blah. According to the "inadmissiblity", which originates from the Briand-Kellogg pact, the EU and Russian federation borders should be redrawn to reflect their pre-war status, and it does not matter, if anyone disputes them, or not, - since the inadmissibility is envoked, the euroschmuckologists should be running redrawing borders, otherwise, the concept, exclusively applied to Israel (which is not even a signatory to the pact), is bogus and a bogus excuse too. Let the resolution thumpers go get a life and a job.

It's the occupation, Stupid.
It's a palistanian occupational occupation.
 
The Palestinians lynched criminals who would still be walking the streets if they had waited for law enforcement to do anything.

Due process is non-existent in the fascist Arab/Muslim/Pallie world.

That is true but it is due to it being controlled by Israel

Wrong, dumb dumb. Administrative control of the West Bank was transferred to the PNA back in 1993 with the Oslo Accords.

Now, you are a little less clueless, moron.
 
Possibly at the same time Israel conforms to UNSCR 242 and the GCIV protocols.

It's the occupation, Stupid.

Georgie, you're severely uneducated.

242 is non-binding and requires nothing of Israel. 242 is predicated on Israel's enemies making peace with Israel.

Now, you're a little less clueless, Georgie.
"UNSCR 242 Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

(i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'"

The Arab Peace Proposal offered at the Security Council in January of 1976 provided Israel with "the right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

The only thing "binding" on Israeli elites is their blind pursuit of PROFIT.
 
Possibly at the same time Israel conforms to UNSCR 242 and the GCIV protocols.

It's the occupation, Stupid.

Georgie, you're severely uneducated.

242 is non-binding and requires nothing of Israel. 242 is predicated on Israel's enemies making peace with Israel.

Now, you're a little less clueless, Georgie.
"UNSCR 242 Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

(i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'"

The Arab Peace Proposal offered at the Security Council in January of 1976 provided Israel with "the right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

The only thing "binding" on Israeli elites is their blind pursuit of PROFIT.
Tried that, didn't work. Your fantasy, shame no one will fulfill it. :tongue:

Israel will destroy Hamas instead:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX4HYp9agmQ&feature=related[/ame]

 
Last edited:
The Arab Peace Proposal offered at the Security Council in January of 1976 provided Israel with "the right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."
And fllooding Israel with hordes of bogus refugees, as stated in that same "proposal". As I have mentioned elsewhere palistardians are a funny lot - they sincerely make it clear that, they want a state and a jewish one too and fully expect jews to buy that rotten lot.
 
Possibly at the same time Israel conforms to UNSCR 242 and the GCIV protocols.

It's the occupation, Stupid.

Georgie, you're severely uneducated.

242 is non-binding and requires nothing of Israel. 242 is predicated on Israel's enemies making peace with Israel.

Now, you're a little less clueless, Georgie.
"UNSCR 242 Operative Paragraph One 'Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

(i) Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

(ii) Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.'"

The Arab Peace Proposal offered at the Security Council in January of 1976 provided Israel with "the right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."

The only thing "binding" on Israeli elites is their blind pursuit of PROFIT.

Georgie, Georgie, Georgie, UN Res. 242 is NON-BINDING. Since you're brain-dead, that means it has no legal force, whatsoever.

Furthermore, Georgie, Israel has complied with 242 in surrendering Sinai to Egypt.

Further, still, dumb dumb, 242 is contingent upon Hamas and the other dozen terrorist factions to establish peace with Israel, which they refuse to do.

Thus, Israel is obligated to do nothing under the terms of 242.

Your lesson for the day, Georgie.

Enjoyed bitch slapping you, as always.
 
Last edited:
"We feel that these crucial issues need more discussion within the American Jewish community, not less.

"They certainly are debated at length in Israel itself, as evidenced by a recent Ma’ariv poll showing that 52% of Israelis support the 2002 Saudi peace plan calling for full Israeli withdrawal from all occupied territories in exchange for peace with the Arab world—in total opposition to the Israeli government’s policy.

"It’s time for us to join the debate as well, and help formulate a more reasonable solution to the conflict."

You're still stuck on pathetic, Poseur.

From Jew to Jew
 
"We feel that these crucial issues need more discussion within the American Jewish community, not less.

"They certainly are debated at length in Israel itself, as evidenced by a recent Ma’ariv poll showing that 52% of Israelis support the 2002 Saudi peace plan calling for full Israeli withdrawal from all occupied territories in exchange for peace with the Arab world—in total opposition to the Israeli government’s policy.

"It’s time for us to join the debate as well, and help formulate a more reasonable solution to the conflict."

You're still stuck on pathetic, Poseur.

From Jew to Jew


Georgie, international law established Palestine as the Jewish homeland. Thus, there is no occupation, except, the Arab occupation.

Palestine Mandate...
Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country...

Palestine Mandate...
The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions...

Palestine Mandate...
The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.

Busted, again, Georgie.
 
From 5 March 1948 to 9 January 2009 the United Nations Security Council has called on Israel to conform to the same moral standards as the rest of the world.

In virtually every case Israel, with the full backing of the US government, has refused to do so. Any other country on the planet would have faced boycotts, divestment, and sanctions decades ago.

Israel's time is SWIFTly approaching.

1) you are an idiot

2) the world would be a better place if most of the world followed israel's standard. No country does.

Any country would have relocated the Arab squatters back to their home state.
Problem is their home state kicked them out because they are idiots. I say Israel needs to round every palestian in Israel and escort them as far away from Israel as possible, lets say, Iran.
 
"On 27 December 2008, without warning, Israeli forces began a devastating bombing campaign on the Gaza Strip codenamed Operation 'Cast Lead'. Its stated aim was to end rocket attacks into Israel by armed groups affiliated with Hamas and other Palestinian factions.

"By 18 January 2009 some 1,400 Palestinians had been killed and large areas of Gaza had been razed to the ground.

"Amnesty International believes that the deaths of so many unarmed civilians and the manner in which they came under attack demand a thorough, independent and impartial investigation into the conduct of all parties in the conflict."

Any thoughts on why "Noble Israel" initiated this bloodbath by targeting a police graduation ceremony?

Amnesty International
Where is amnesty int'l. when the palestians attack Israel with cowardly suicide bombers? Yeah, nowhere. Israel is 100% right in it's actions. The palestinians started this years ago, they get what they deserve.
 
From 5 March 1948 to 9 January 2009 the United Nations Security Council has called on Israel to conform to the same moral standards as the rest of the world.

In virtually every case Israel, with the full backing of the US government, has refused to do so. Any other country on the planet would have faced boycotts, divestment, and sanctions decades ago.

Israel's time is SWIFTly approaching.

the world would be a better place if most of the world followed israel's standard. No country does.

Any country would have relocated the Arab squatters back to their home state.

If most of the world followed Israel everyone would be busy taking over other countries, turfing off the native residents, demolishing the natives homes and b0mbing innocent civilians.
Nothing native about the Palestininians. Israel is defending themselves. The Palestinians are the invaders.
 
From 5 March 1948 to 9 January 2009 the United Nations Security Council has called on Israel to conform to the same moral standards as the rest of the world.

In virtually every case Israel, with the full backing of the US government, has refused to do so. Any other country on the planet would have faced boycotts, divestment, and sanctions decades ago.

Israel's time is SWIFTly approaching.

1) you are an idiot

2) the world would be a better place if most of the world followed israel's standard. No country does.

Any country would have relocated the Arab squatters back to their home state.
Problem is their home state kicked them out because they are idiots. I say Israel needs to round every palestian in Israel and escort them as far away from Israel as possible, lets say, Iran.

Israeli Arabs will never leave Israel. They have it too good there and know it. Where are they going to go to, Saudi Arabia? Yemen? Sudan?
 

Forum List

Back
Top